This study examines the cultural and contextual factors that influence the decisions of underrepresented urban youth, who identify themselves as Black/ African American, Latino, Arab, or Chaldean, to participate in youth programs. Although youth programs are increasingly recognized for their positive influences, little is known about the factors that influence a young person's decision to participate. Using the concept systems method, participants engaged in “brainstorming sessions” that led to more in-depth discussions about why youth participate in youth programs. Overall, youth emphasized how youth programs help young people stay off the streets, learn new skills, avoid boredom, and provide opportunities for fun and enjoyable activities. The perceived barriers preventing young people from participating differed between genders and ethnicities and included barriers related to personal decisions, peer influence, and parental restrictions.
Aneshensel, C.S., & Sucoff, C.A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293-310.
2.
Aswad, M. (2001). Health Survey of the Arab, Muslim, and Chaldean American communities in MichiganDetroit: Michigan Department of Community Health, Division of Family and Community Health.
3.
Baker, D., & Hultsman, J. (1998). Thunderbirds Teen Center program evaluation. Retrieved from http://rptsweb.tamu.edu/Faculty/Witt/conpubs/thunder.pdf
4.
Barber, B.L., Eccles, J.S., & Stone, M.R. (2001). Whatever happened to the “jock,” the “brain”, and the “princess”? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 429-455.
5.
Bocarro, J. (2002). Moving beyond the walls: The need for youth outreach programs. Parks and Recreation, 37(3), 28-43.
6.
Borden, L.M., Perkins, F.A., Carleton-Hug, A., Stone, M., & Keith, J.G. (2006). Challenges and opportunities to Latino youth development: Increasing meaningful participation in youth development programs. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28, 187-208.
7.
Bridges, L.J., Margie, N.G., & Zaff, J.F. (2001). Background for community-level work on emotional well-being in adolescence: Reviewing the literature on contributing factors . Washington, DC: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
8.
Brown, R., & Evans, W.P. (2002). Extracurricular activity and ethnicity: Creating greater school connection among diverse student populations. Urban Education, 37(1), 41-58.
9.
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the non-school hours, task force on youth development and community programs and Carnegie Council on adolescent development. New York: Author.
10.
Carruthers, C.P., & Busser, J.A. (2000). A qualitative outcome study of Boys and Girls Club program leaders, club members, and parents. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18, 50-67.
11.
Davalos, D.B., Chavez, E.L., & Guardiola, R.J. (1999). The effects of extracurricular activity, ethnic identification, and perception of school on student dropout rates. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21, 66-77.
12.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Duffett, A., & Johnson, J. (2004). All work and no play? Washington, DC: Public Agenda.
14.
Eccles, J.S., & Barber, B.L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters?Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10-43.
15.
Eccles, J.S., & Gootman, J.A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development . Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Research Council, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Fletcher, A.C., Elder, G.H., & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence , 10, 29-48.
17.
Gambone, M., & Arbreton, A. (1997). Safe havens: The contributions of youth organizations to healthy adolescent development. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
18.
Ginsburg, K.R., Alexander, P.M., Hunt, J., Sullivan, M., Zhao, H., & Cnaan, A. (2002). Enhancing the likelihood for a positive future: The perspective of inner-city youth. Pediatrics, 109, 1136-1143.
19.
Greenberg, M.T., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (1999). Preventing mental disorders in school-age children: A review of the effectiveness of prevention programs. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Prevention Research Center.
20.
Hair, E.C., Jager, J., & Garrett, S. (2001). Background for community-level work on social competency in adolescence: Reviewing the literature on contributing factors . Washington, DC: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
21.
Halpern, R., Barker, G., & Mollard, W. (2000). Youth programs as alternative spaces to be: A study of neighborhood youth programs in Chicago's West Town. Youth & Society, 31, 469-506.
22.
Huebner, A.J., & Mancini, J.A. (2003). Shaping structured out-of-school time use among youth: The effects of self, family, and friend systems. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 453-463.
23.
Jekielek, S.M., Moore, K.A., Hair, E.C., & Scarupa, H.J. (2002). Mentoring: A promising strategy for youth development . Washington, DC: Child Trends.
24.
Larson, R.W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development . American Psychologist, 55, 170-183.
25.
McGlaughlin, M., Irby, M.A., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
26.
Passmore, A., & French, D. (2001). Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents' participation in leisure activities. Adolescence, 36, 67-75.
27.
Perkins, D.F., & Borden, L.M. (2003). Key elements of community youth development programs . In F. A. Villarruel, D. F. Perkins, L. M. Borden , & J. G. Keith (Eds.), Community youth development: Practice, policy, and research (pp. 327-340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Raymore, L., Godbey, G., & Crawford, D. (1994). Self-esteem, gender, and socioeconomic status: Their relation to perceptions of constraints on leisure among adolescents . Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 99-118.
29.
Redd, Z., Cochran, S., Hair, E., & Moore, K. (2002). Academic achievement programs and youth development: A synthesis. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
30.
Rhodes, J.E., Grossman, J.B., & Resch, N.L. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents' academic adjustment. Child Development, 71, 1662-1671.
31.
Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K.R. (1999). The reason and rhyme of qualitative research: Why, when, and how to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. Journal of AdolescentHealth, 25, 371-378.
32.
Schinke, S.P., Cole, K.C., & Poulin, S.R. (2000). Enhancing the educational achievement of at-risk youth. Prevention Science, 1, 51-60.
33.
Trochim, W. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
34.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Summary file 1 (SF 1): Matrix P8. Census 2000. Retrieved June 30, 2002, from http://www.census.gov
35.
Villarruel, F.A., Montero-Sieburth, M., Dunbar, C., & Outlay, C.W. (2005). Dorothy, there is no yellow brick road: The paradox of community youth development approaches for Latino and African American urban youth. In J. Mahoney, J. S. Eccles, & R. Larson (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 111-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Weiss, H.R., Little, P.M.D., & Bouffard, S.M. (2005). More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Direction for Youth Development, 105, 15-31.
