The last decade has seen the growth of knowledge societies within neoliberal economies. As a result, learners are increasingly individualized and expected to be responsible for their learning. The main part of the article uses findings from a study of young masculinities to argue that boys are not free to choose to work toward qualifications but are concerned to manage their everyday school interactions in the context of their complicated, multiple positioning.
Arnot, M., David, M.,& Weiner, G. (1999). Closing the gender gap? Postwar education and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
Beck, U. (1996). The reinvention of politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
Bleach, K. (Ed.). (1999). Raising boys’achievement in schools. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). The essence of neoliberalism (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Le Monde Diplomatique. Retrieved December 22, 2003, from www.analitica.com/bitblioteca/bourdieu/neoliberalism.asp
5.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities.Cambridge: Polity.
7.
Connell, R. (2000). The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Dybbroe, B.,& Ollagnier, E. (Eds.). (2003). Why and how are we challenging gender in lifelong learning? In Challenging gender in lifelong learning: European perspectives(pp. 11-25). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University Press.
9.
Elliott, A. (2002). Identity politics and privatisation: Modern fantasies, postmodern after-effects. In V. Walkerdine (Ed.), Challenging subjects: Critical psychology for a new millennium(pp. 11-22). London: Palgrave.
10.
Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V.,& Maw, J. (Eds.). (1998). Failing boys?Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
11.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2002). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. London: Palgrave.
12.
George, S. (1999, March). A short history of neo-liberalism: Twenty years of elite economics and emerging opportunities for structural change. Paper presented at the Conference on Economic Sovereignty in a Globalising World, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved December 22, 2003, from www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/econ/histneol.htm
13.
Hodges, D. (1998). Participation as dis-identification within a community of practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5, 272-290.
14.
Jackson, C. (2002). “Laddishness” as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14, 37-51.
15.
Jordan, E. (1995). Fighting boys and fantasy play: The construction of masculinity in the early years of school. Gender and Education, 7(1), 69-85.
16.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin& J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
18.
Lemke, T. (2001). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism. Retrieved May 18, 2003, from www.thomaslemkeweb.de/engl
19.
Linehan, C.,& McCarthy, J. (2001a). Arelational approach to understanding classroom practice. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Learning in classrooms: A cultural-historical approach(pp. 321-338). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
20.
Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001b). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(2), 129-147.
21.
Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
22.
Majors, R., & Billson, J. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. New York: Lexington.
23.
Martino, W. (1999). “Cool boys,” “party animals,” “squids” and “poofters”: Interrogating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 239-263.
24.
Noble, C., & Bradford, W. (2000). Getting it right for boys and girls. London: Routledge.
25.
Reed, L. R. (1999). Troubling boys and disturbing discourses on masculinity and schooling: A feminist exploration of current debates and interventions concerning boys in school. Gender and Education, 11(1), 93-110.
26.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
27.
Said, E. (2000, September 7-13). Problems of neoliberalism. Al-Ahram Weekly, 498. Retrieved December 22, 2003, from http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2000/498/op2.htm
28.
Sewell, T. (1997). Black masculinities and schooling: How Black boys survive modern schooling. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
29.
Skelton, C. (2001). Schooling the boys: Masculinities and primary education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
30.
Swain, J. (2000). “The money’s good, the fame’s good, the girls are good”: The role of playground football in the construction of young boys’ masculinity in a junior school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 95-109.
31.
Walkerdine, V. (1997). Daddy’s girl. London: Macmillan.
32.
Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. London, Palgrave.
33.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387-412.
