State and local jurisdictions throughout the United States enacted a wide array of new juvenile justice policies in recent years. Many of these policies were intended to make the juvenile justice system tougher, but others improved prevention, increased rehabilitation, and enhanced the restorative features of the juvenile justice system. This article describes the most prominent new ideas in juvenile justice and addresses a question usually asked by policy makers: What works? It suggests that a new generation of innovative programs might revive the spirit of American juvenile justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarado, R. , & Kumpfer, K. (2000). Strengthening America's families. Juvenile Justice, 7, 8-18.
2.
American Youth Policy Forum. (1997). Some things do make a difference for youth: A compendium of evaluations of youth programs and practices.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Andrews, D. A. , & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Aos, S. , Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (1998). Preventive programs for young offenders effective and cost-effective. Overcrowded Times, 9, 1-11.
5.
Austin, J. , Johnson, K. D., & Gregoriou, M. (2000). Juveniles in adult prisons and jails: A national assessment (NCJ 182503). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
6.
Bazemore, G. (2001). Young people, trouble, and crime: Restorative justice as a normative theory of informal social control and social support. Youth & Society, 33, 199-226.
7.
Bazemore, G. , & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 296-316.
8.
Bazemore, G. , & Umbreit, M. (2001). A comparison of four restorative conferencing models (Juvenile Justice Bulletin NCJ 184738). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
9.
Bernard, T. J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice.New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Bishop, D. M. , Frazier, C. E., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Winner, L. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference?Crime and Delinquency, 42, 171-191.
11.
Bortner, M. A. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organization realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 53-73.
12.
Braga, A. A. , Kennedy, D. M., Piehl, A. M., & Waring, E. J. (2000). The Boston Gun Project: Impact evaluation findings (Research report). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
13.
Braithwaite, J. (2001). Restorative justice and a new criminal law of substance abuse. Youth & Society, 33, 227-248.
14.
Butts, J. A. , & Buck, J. (2000). Teen courts: Focus on research [Juvenile justice bulletin]. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
15.
Butts, J. A. , & Mitchell, O. (2000). Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 2: Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp. 167-213). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
16.
Cocozza, J. J. , & Skowyra, K. (2000). Youth with mental health disorders: Issues and emerging responses. Juvenile Justice, 7, 3-13.
17.
Cohen, M. A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 5-32.
18.
Connor, R. (2000, January). Community oriented lawyering: An emerging approach to legal practice. National Institute of Justice Journal, 26-33.
19.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1996). Combating violence and delinquency: The national juvenile justice action plan.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
20.
Crowe, A. H. (1998). Drug identification and testing in the juvenile justice system.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
Cullen, F. T. , & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 3: Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
22.
Danegger, A. E. , Cohen, C. E., Hayes, C. D., & Holden, G. D. (1999). Juvenile accountability incentive block grants: Strategic planning guide.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
23.
Durlak, J. A. , & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 115-152.
24.
Elliott, D. (1998). Blueprints for violence prevention.Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science.
25.
Fagan, J. (1995). Separating the men from the boys: The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Sourcebook on serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders (pp. 238-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Fagan, J. (1996). The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law and Policy, 18, 77-113.
27.
Feld, B. C. (1987). The juvenile court meets the principle of the offense: Legislative changes in juvenile waiver statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 471-533.
28.
Feld, B. C. (1999). Bad kids—Race and the transformation of the juvenile court.New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Greenwood, P. W. , Lipson, A. J., Abrahamse, A., & Zimring, F. (1983). Youth crime and juvenile justice in California: A report to the legislature (R-3016-CSA). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30.
Greenwood, P. W. , Model, K.E.C., Rydell, P., & Chiesa, J. (1996). Diverting children from a life in crime: Measuring costs and benefits.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31.
Griffin, P. , Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions (OJJDP Report NCJ 172836). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
32.
Guarino-Ghezzi, S. , & Loughran, E. J. (1996). Balancing juvenile justice.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
33.
Hamparian, D. , Estep, L., Muntean, S., Priestino, R., Swisher, R., Wallace, P., & White, J. (1982). Youth in adult courts: Between two worlds.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
34.
Harland, A. T. (Ed.) (1996). Choosing correctional interventions that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Henggeler, S. W. (1997). Treating serious anti-social behavior: The MST approach.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
36.
Henggeler, S. W. (1999). Multisystemic therapy: An overview of clinical procedures, outcomes, and policy implications. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 4, 2-10.
37.
Howell, J. C. (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
38.
Howell, J. C. , & Hawkins, J. D. (1998). Prevention of youth violence. In M. H. Tonry & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Youth violence (pp. 263-315). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Jensen, E. L. , & Metsger, L. K. (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 96-104.
40.
Karp, D. R. , & Breslin, B. (2001). Restorative justice in school communities. Youth & Society, 33, 249-272.
41.
Karp, D. R. , & Clear, T. R. (2000). Community justice: A conceptual framework. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 2: Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations (pp. 323-368). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
42.
Lipsey, M. W. (1999a). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents?Annals, 564, 142-166.
43.
Lipsey, M. W. (1999b). Can rehabilitative programs reduce the recidivism of juvenile offenders? An inquiry into the effectiveness of practical programs. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 6, 611-641.
44.
Lipsey, M. W. , & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Lipsey, M. W. , & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective interventions for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Lipsey, M. W. , Wilson, D. B., & Cothern, L. (2000). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
47.
MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
48.
Manfredi, C. P. (1998). The supreme court and juvenile justice.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
49.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
50.
McCord, J. , Widom, C. S., & Crowell, N. A. (Eds.). (2001). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Research Council and Institute of Medicine.
51.
McDonald, L. , & Frey, H. M. (1999). Families and Schools Together: Building relationships.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
52.
McGarrell, E. F. , Olivares, K., Crawford, K., & Kroovand, N. (2000). Returning justice to the community: The Indianapolis juvenile restorative justice experiment.Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
53.
McGuire, J. (Ed.). (1995). What works: Reducing offending.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
54.
McNulty, E. W. (1996). The transfer of juvenile offenders to adult court: Panacea or problem?Law and Policy, 18, 61-75.
55.
Mears, D. P. (1998). Evaluation issues confronting juvenile justice sentencing reforms: A case study of Texas. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 443-463.
56.
Mendel, R. A. (2000). Less hype, more help: Reducing juvenile crime, what works—And what doesn't.Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
57.
Morris, S. M. , Steadman, H. J., & Veysey, B. M. (1997). Mental health services in United States jails: A survey of innovative practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 3-19.
58.
Mrazek, P. J. , & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59.
National Criminal Justice Association. (1997). Juvenile justice reform initiatives in the states: 1994-1996.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
60.
Oldenettel, D. , & Wordes, M. (2000). The community assessment center concept.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
61.
Peters, R. H. , & Bartoi, M. G. (1997). Screening and assessment of co-occurring disorders in the justice system.Delmar, NY: GAINS Center.
62.
Peters, R. H. , & Hills, H. A. (1997). Intervention strategies for offenders with co-occurring disorders: What works?Delmar, NY: GAINS Center.
63.
Platt, A. M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Podkopacz, M. R. , & Feld, B. C. (1996). The end of the line: An empirical study of judicial waiver. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 449-492.
65.
Prescott, L. (1998). Improving policy and practice for adolescent girls with co-occurring disorders in the juvenile justice system.Delmar, NY: GAINS Center.
66.
Puzzanchera, C. , Stahl, A., Finnegan, T., Snyder, H., Poole, R., & Tierney, N. (2000). Juvenile court statistics 1997 (NCJ 180864). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
67.
Risler, E. A. , Sweatman, T., & Nackerud, L. (1998). Evaluating the Georgia legislative waiver's effectiveness in deterring juvenile crime. Research in Social Work Practice, 8, 657-667.
68.
Rivers, J. E. , & Anwyl, R. S. (2000). Juvenile Assessment Centers: Strengths, weaknesses, and potential. The Prison Journal, 80, 96-113.
69.
Rivers, J. E. , Dembo, R., & Anwyl, R. S. (1998). The Hillsborough County, Florida, Juvenile Assessment Center. The Prison Journal, 78, 439-450.
70.
Rothman, D. J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
71.
Rottman, D. , & Casey, P. (1999, July). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the emergence of problem-solving courts. National Institute of Justice Journal, 12-19.
72.
Schlossman, S. L. (1977). Love and the American delinquent.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Sherman, L. W. , Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (Eds.). (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
74.
Singer, S. I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Singer, S. I. , & McDowall, D. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York juvenile offender law. Law and Society Review, 22, 521-535.
76.
Slayton, J. (2000). Establishing and maintaining interagency information sharing.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
77.
Snyder, H. N. , & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report (NCJ 178257). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
78.
Snyder, H. N. , Sickmund, M., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (2000). Juvenile transfers to criminal court in the 1990s: Lessons learned from four studies (NCJ 181301). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
79.
Tonry, M. H. , & Wilson, J. Q. (Eds.). (1990). Drugs and crime.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
Torbet, P. , Gable, R., Hurst, H. IV, Montgomery, I., Szymanski, L., & Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
81.
Torbet, P. , & Szymanski, L. (1998). State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996-97 update (Juvenile Justice Bulletin NCJ 172835). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
82.
Watkins, J. C., Jr. (1998). The juvenile justice century.Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
83.
Wilson, J. J. , & Howell, J. C. (1993). Comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: Program summary.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
84.
Winner, L. , Lanza-Kaduce, L., Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 548-563.
