Circularity means extending the life of resources that would otherwise end up in a landfill. But recirculation is not limited to material resources. Social networks, community assets, and industrial traditions can also be repurposed, raising the question: how can innovations in material circularity be attentive to social inclusion and outcomes? We address this through the case of Material Return, a textile initiative in Western North Carolina that transforms textile waste into high-quality fiber and yarn while supporting smaller firms, stabilizing jobs, and elevating worker voice. By highlighting the enabling institutional arrangements and practices that allow Material Return to combine material and societal circularity, this case offers lessons for other cities and regions seeking to align environmental sustainability with social equity.
Aarikka-StenroosLRitalaPThomasLDW (2021) Circular economy ecosystems: A typology, definitions, and implications. In: TeerikangasSOnkilaTKoistinenK, et al. (eds) Research Handbook of Sustainability Agency. Edward Elgar, pp. 260–276.
2.
AgyemanJBullardRDEvansB (2003) Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. MIT Press.
3.
AshtonWSFratiniCFIsenhourC, et al. (2022) Justice, equity, and the circular economy: Introduction to the special double issue. Local Environment27(10–11): 1173–1181.
4.
BerkGGalvanDCHattamV (2013) Political Creativity: Reconfiguring Institutional Order and Change. University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
BerkePR (2002) Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature17(1): 21–36.
6.
BjørnbetMMSkaarCFetAM, et al. (2021) Circular economy in manufacturing companies: A review of case study literature. Journal of Cleaner Production294: 126268.
7.
BlockF (2003) Karl Polanyi and the writing of ‘The Great Transformation’. Theory and Society32(3): 275–306.
8.
BurawoyM (1998) The extended case method. Sociological Theory16(1): 4–33.
9.
Calisto FriantMVermeulenWJVSalomoneR (2020) A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling161: 104917.
10.
CampbellS (2018) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. In: SteinJM (ed.) Classic Readings in Urban Planning, 2nd edn. Routledge, pp. 308–326.
11.
ChaJMStevisDVachonTE, et al. (2022) A green new deal for all: The centrality of a worker and community-led just transition in the U.S.Political Geography95: 102594.
12.
CummingsSL (2001) Community economic development as progressive politics: Toward a grassroots movement for economic justice. Stanford Law Review54: 399–493.
13.
DellerS (2025) Are we at an inflection point in community economic development? The 4th wave. Economic Development Quarterly39(4): 215–231.
EscobarA (2018) Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.
16.
FawazMMarquesETheodoreN, et al. (2025) Reflections on critical urban studies in perilous times. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research49(3): 473–478.
17.
FitzgeraldJGreen LeighN (2002) Economic Revitalization: Cases and Strategies for City and Suburb. Sage Publications.
18.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
19.
ForbesA (2018) A measure of interdependence: Skill in the supply chain. Economic Development Quarterly32(4): 326–340.
20.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2006) The End of Capitalism (as We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. University of Minnesota Press.
21.
HaughtonG (1998) Principles and practice of community economic development. Regional Studies32(9): 872–877.
22.
IskanderNLoweN (2023) Biophilic institutions: Building new solidarities between the economy & nature. Dædalus152(1): 81–93.
23.
JacobsFHarringtonELylesW, et al. (2024) Just energy transitions: Introduction. Planning Theory & Practice25(4): 569–596.
24.
KöhlerJGeelsFWKernF, et al. (2019) An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions31: 1–32.
25.
LatoucheS (2009) Farewell to Growth. Polity Press.
26.
LazonickWMazzucatoM (2013) The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: Who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards?Industrial and Corporate Change22(4): 1093–1128.
27.
LoweN (2021) Putting Skill to Work: How to Create Good Jobs in Uncertain Times. MIT Press.
28.
LoweNFeldmanMP (2017) Institutional life within an entrepreneurial region. Geography Compass11(3): e12306.
29.
LoweNVinodraiT (2020) The maker-manufacturing nexus as a place-connecting strategy: Implications for regions ‘left-behind’. Economic Geography96(4): 315–335.
30.
LoweNKelmensonSMyersJ (2024) Centering workers and advancing business needs: Nine case studies of partnerships in the manufacturing sector. Research report, December. WorkRise, Urban Institute.
31.
MadlandD (2021) Re-Union: How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States. Cornell University Press.
32.
MoreauVSahakianMVan GriethuysenP, et al. (2017) Coming full circle: Why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology21(3): 497–506.
33.
PioreMJ (1979) Qualitative research techniques in economics. Administrative Science Quarterly24(4): 560–569.
34.
ReeseLARosenfeldRA (2001) The Civic Culture of Local Economic Development. Sage Publications.
35.
Revolve (2021) The circular economy: Societal transformation or economic fairytale: Interview with Martin Calisto Friant. Revolve, 18June, pp. 76–80.
36.
RiofrancosTKendallADayemoKK, et al. (2023) Achieving zero emissions with more mobility and less mining. Report, Climate and Community Project, UC Davis.
37.
SabelCF (1993) Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. Center for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia University School of Law.
38.
SchrankA (2006) Case-based research. In: PerecmanECurranSR (eds) A Handbook for Social Science Field Research: Essays & Bibliographic Sources on Research Design and Methods. Sage Publications, pp. 21–38.
39.
SchumacherKForsterAL (2022) Facilitating a circular economy for textiles workshop report. NIST SP 1500-207. National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.).
40.
SolisMMatsuokaMRaphaelC (2024) Community economic development. In: RaphaelCMatsuokaM (eds) Ground Truths: Community-Engaged Research for Environmental Justice. University of California Press, pp. 155–169.
41.
SpicerJS (2020) Worker and community ownership as an economic development strategy: Innovative rebirth or tired retread of a failed idea?Economic Development Quarterly34(4): 325–342.
42.
SpicerJSCasper-FuttermanE (2023) Conceptualizing U.S. community economic development: Evidence from New York City. Journal of Planning Education and Research43(4): 940–957.
43.
StorperM (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies2(3): 191–221.
44.
TanveerUHoangTGIshaqS, et al. (2025) Public-private partnerships as catalysts for digital transformation and circular economy: Insights from developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change219: 124270.
45.
TendlerJ (1997) Good Government in the Tropics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
