Current research extensively examines the relationship between geographical environment, spatio-temporal activities, and subjective well-being. However, how well-being accumulates across different temporal scales remains unclear. Based on activity diary data collected from intercity commuters in the city of Zhongshan in China, this study analyzes the accumulation process of subjective well-being from the activity episode level to the day level. The findings reveal that: (1) activity episode well-being (ESW) is influenced by both activity types and spatial contexts, while day-level well-being (DSW) is mainly affected by the type of activities conducted in the day; notably, the impact of travel on activity episode well-being is opposite to that on day-level well-being; (2) in general, the accumulation from ESW to DSW follows the average rule; and (3) considering different mobility patterns among residents, the accumulation from ESW to DSW for the fixed mobility group adheres to a “begin–end” rule, whereas for the flexible mobility group it follows a “peak (low)–end” rule. These findings establish a dialogue between geography and psychology in the field of residents’ well-being, contributing to a deeper understanding of the factors influencing and processes shaping different temporal scales of subjective well-being among urban residents. They offer valuable insights for more refined urban health planning and governance in the future.
AbenozaRFCatsOSusiloYO (2019) How does travel satisfaction sum up? An exploratory analysis in decomposing the door-to-door experience for multimodal trips. Transportation46: 1615–1642.
2.
AndersonNH (1981) Foundations of Information Integration Theory. Academic Press.
3.
BirenboimA (2018) The influence of urban environments on our subjective momentary experiences. Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science45(5): 915–932.
4.
CarlsenFLeknesS (2022) The paradox of the unhappy, growing city: Reconciling evidence. Cities126: 103648.
5.
ChenYLiYWangY, et al. (2020) Latest achievement. Cross-city commuting series studies in the Pearl River Delta – Chronicle of the twin cities along the Pearl and Zhuhai rivers. Baidu Maps. Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1655856973555655425 (accessed 12 November 2025).
6.
ChenZYehAGO (2022) Delineating functional urban areas in Chinese mega city regions using fine-grained population data and cellphone location data: A case of Pearl River Delta. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems93: 101771.
7.
CheongSMBlackACWemmS (2022) Confinement effects on older adults using ecological momentary assessment in the U.S. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports9: 100358.
8.
CouclelisHGolledgeRGGaleN, et al. (1987) Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology7(2): 99–122.
9.
DelboscACurrieG (2011) Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being. Transport Policy18(4): 555–562.
10.
De VosJSchwanenTVan AckerV, et al. (2013) Travel and subjective wellbeing: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transport Reviews33(4): 421–442.
11.
DienerEWirtzDOishiS (2001) End effects of rated life quality: The James Dean effect. Psychological Science12(2): 124–128.
12.
DienerEWirtzDTovW, et al. (2010) New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research97(2): 143–156.
13.
EttemaDGärlingTOlssonLE, et al. (2010) Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice44(9): 723–732.
HorwitzAGMcCarthyKSenS (2024) A review of the peak–end rule in mental health contexts. Current Opinion in Psychology58: 101845.
16.
HuYSobhaniAEttemaD (2022) How does commuting influence time use and domain and life satisfaction? Evidence from dual-earner couples with school-age children in a small Chinese city. Cities131: 104046.
17.
HuangBFengZPanZ, et al. (2022) Amount of and proximity to blue spaces and general health among older Chinese adults in private and public housing: A national population study. Health & Place74: 102774.
18.
IshikawaTMontelloDR (2006) Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology52(2): 93–129.
19.
KahnemanD (2000) Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In: KahnemanDTverskyA (eds) Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, pp.693–708.
20.
Kim-PrietoCDienerETamirM, et al. (2005) Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Well-being Studies6(3): 261–300.
21.
KuykendallLLeiXZhuZ, et al. (2020) Leisure choices and employee well-being: Comparing need fulfillment and well-being during TV and other leisure activities. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being12(2): 532–558.
22.
KwanM (2012a) The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(5): 958–968.
23.
KwanMP (2012b) How GIS can help address the uncertain geographic context problem in social science research. Annals of GIS18(4): 245–255.
24.
KwanMP (2013) Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(5): 1078–1086.
25.
KwanMP (2018) The limits of the neighborhood effect: Contextual uncertainties in geographic, environmental health, and social science research. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(6): 1482–1490.
26.
LiuFZhaoYMaoZ (2025) Unveiling the formation mechanisms of urban residents’ subjective well-being in the digital age: A conceptual framework. Cities163: 106045.
27.
LizanaMCarrascoJATudelaA (2020) Studying the relationship between activity participation, social networks, expenditures and travel behavior on leisure activities. Transportation47(4): 1765–1786.
28.
LuoMKimEKWeibelR, et al. (2023) GPS-derived daily mobility and daily well-being in community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology69(7): 875–887.
29.
MaJDongG (2023) Periodicity and variability in daily activity satisfaction: Toward a space-time modeling of subjective well-being. Annals of the American Association of Geographers113(8): 1918–1938.
30.
MaJTaoYKwanMP, et al. (2020) Assessing mobility-based real-time air pollution exposure in space and time using smart sensors and GPS trajectories in Beijing. Annals of the American Association of Geographers110(2): 434–448.
31.
MaoZWangD (2020) Residential relocation and life satisfaction change: Is there a difference between household couples?Cities97: 102565.
32.
MaoZEttemaDDijstM (2016) Commuting trip satisfaction in Beijing: Exploring the influence of multimodal behavior and modal flexibility. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice94: 592–603.
33.
MavrukCKıralEKıralG (2021) Spatial effects over time-framed well-being. Journal of Well-being Studies22(2): 517–554.
34.
Miron-ShatzT (2009) Evaluating multiepisode events: Boundary conditions for the peak–end rule. Emotion9(2): 206–213.
35.
MontelloDR (2018) Handbook of Behavioral and Cognitive Geography. Edward Elgar.
36.
MouratidisK (2021) Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities115: 103229.
37.
NordbakkeSSchwanenT (2014) Well-being and mobility: A theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities9(1): 104–129.
38.
NordbøECANordhHRaanaasRK, et al. (2020) Promoting activity participation and well-being among children and adolescents: A systematic review of neighborhood built-environment determinants. JBI Evidence Synthesis18(3): 370–458.
39.
Okulicz-KozarynA (2017) Unhappy metropolis (when American city is too big). Cities61: 144–155.
40.
PavotWDienerE (2013) Well-being experienced: The science of subjective well-being. In: DavidSABoniwellIConley AyersA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Happiness. Oxford University Press, pp.134–151.
41.
PerchouxCChaixBCumminsS, et al. (2013) Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: Accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. Health & Place21: 86–93.
42.
SchwanenTWangD (2014) Well-being, context, and everyday activities in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104(4): 833–851.
43.
ScollonCNHowardAHCaldwellAE, et al. (2009) The role of ideal affect in the experience and memory of emotions. Journal of Well-being Studies10(3): 257–269.
44.
ShellerMUrryJ (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space38(2): 207–226.
45.
StrijboschWMitasOvan BlaricumT, et al. (2021) When the parts of the sum are greater than the whole: Assessing the peak-and-end-theory for a heterogeneous, multi-episodic tourism experience. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management20: 100607.
46.
SuLZhouSKwanMP, et al. (2022) The impact of immediate urban environments on people’s momentary well-being. Urban Studies59(1): 140–160.
47.
SuLZhouSSongJ, et al. (2023) Inside and outside the neighborhood: Short-term and long-term subjective well-being by geographical context. Health & Place83: 103086.
48.
SuzukiHFujiiSGärlingT, et al. (2014) Rules for aggregated satisfaction with work commutes. Transportation41(3): 495–506.
49.
TaylorHAGardonyALBrunyéTT (2018) Environmental knowledge: Cognitive flexibility in structures and processes. In: MontelloDR (ed.) Handbook of Behavioral and Cognitive Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.693–708.
50.
ValléeJShareckMKestensY, et al. (2022) Everyday geography and service accessibility: The contours of disadvantage in relation to mental health. Annals of the American Association of Geographers112(4): 931–947.
51.
WangBLooBPYZhangF (2024) Aging in place: Toward understanding momentary well-being and daily satisfaction of older people. Annals of the American Association of Geographers114(9): 2044–2067.
52.
WangDWangF (2016a) Contributions of the usage and affective experience of the residential environment to residential satisfaction. Housing Studies31(1): 42–60.
53.
WangDSchwanenTMaoZ (2019) Does exposure to richer and poorer neighborhoods influence wellbeing?Cities95: 102408.
54.
WangFWangD (2016b) Place, geographical context and subjective well-being: State of art and future directions. In: WangDHeS (eds) Mobility, Sociability and Well-Being of Urban Living. Springer, pp.189–230.
55.
WangXLiuYYaoY, et al. (2023) Associations between streetscape characteristics at Chinese adolescents’ activity places and active travel patterns on weekdays and weekends. Journal of Transport & Health31: 101653.
56.
WeiLKwanMPVermeulenR, et al. (2023) Measuring environmental exposures in people’s activity space: The need to account for travel modes and exposure decay. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology33(6): 954–962.
57.
YangMWangD (2023) How do spatio-temporally patterned everyday activities explain variations in people’s mental health?Annals of the American Association of Geographers113(8): 1781–1799.
58.
ZhangJZhengYWenT, et al. (2022a) The impact of built environment on physical activity and subjective well-being of urban residents: A study of core cities in the Yangtze River Delta Survey. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1050486.
59.
ZhangLZhouSKwanMP, et al. (2021) Assessing individual environmental exposure derived from the spatio-temporal behavior context and its impacts on mental health. Health & Place71: 102655.
60.
ZhangZAmegborPMSigsgaardT, et al. (2022b) Assessing the association between urban features and human physiological stress response using wearable sensors in different urban contexts. Health & Place78: 102924.
61.
ZhaoYXuDMaoZ (2024) Across the city boundaries: Exploring the impact of neighborhood environment on intercity commuters’ life satisfaction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment136: 104433.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
