Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Chinese

In this article, we shed light on the growth and flexibility of the voluntary sector as it responds to the housing crisis in American cities. To do so, we adopt a perspective from the margins of the post-welfare city (using governmentality studies), focusing on obscure grassroots actors at the interface of the state, the voluntary sector and civil society. Based on fieldwork carried out in Portland, Oregon (USA), this article analyzes city code changes and incentives as government technologies, to shed light on how civil society and voluntary organizations operating at the margins are made responsible for providing resources and participating in the response to homelessness, while simultaneously having their practices subjected to control. We argue that, far from being excluded, some organizations at the margins are selected by the state for inclusion in the voluntary sector, while others remain at the margins as a way to delegitimize their own interventions and the way they provide services.

Keywords

homelessness margins voluntary sector post-welfare city governmentality Portland

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allard

(2009) Out of Reach: Place, Poverty and the New American Welfare State. Yale University Press.

Alternative Shelter Network (2022) Shared beliefs. Available at: https://www.shelternow.org/asn (accessed 19 March 2023).

Barretta

Busco

(2011) Technologies of government in public sector’s networks: In search of cooperation through management control innovations. Management Accounting Research 22(4): 211–219.

Benson

(2022) Shadows of the shadow state: Grassroots, refugee-led organizations within a multi-scalar and contested resettlement institutional domain. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40(8): 1745–1752.

Bonnet

(2019) The Upper Limit. How Low-Wage Work Defines Punishment and Welfare. University of California Press.

Brenner

(2004) New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford University Press.

City of Portland (n.d.) About the S2HC Project – Part 1 and Part 2. Available at: https://www.portland.gov/bps/planning/s2hc/about-s2hc-project#toc-goals-of-part-2-of-the-project (acces-sed 20 March 2023).

City of Portland (2021) Shelter to Housing Continuum Project. Available at https://www.portland.gov/bps/planning/s2hc/about-s2hc-project (accessed 22 October 2025).

Cloke

Johnsen

May

(2007) The periphery of care: Emergency services for homeless people in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 23(4): 387–401.

10.

Darby

(2016) Dynamic resistance: Third-sector processes for transforming neoliberalization. Antipode 48(4): 977-999.

11.

DeVerteuil

(2017) Post-welfare city at the margins: Immigrant precarity and the mediating third sector in London. Urban Geography 38(10): 1517–1533.

12.

DeVerteuil

(2019) Post-revanchist cities? Urban Geography 40(7): 1055–1061.

13.

DeVerteuil

May

Von Mahs

(2009) Complexity not collapse: recasting the geographies of homelessness in a ‘punitive’ age. Progress in Human Geography 33(5): 646–666.

14.

DeVerteuil

Marr

Kiener

(2022) More than bare-bones survival? From the urban margins to the urban commons. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112(7): 2080–2095.

15.

DeVerteuil

Power

Trudeau

(2019) The relational geographies of the voluntary sector: Disentangling the ballast of strangers. Progress in Human Geography, 44(5), 919-937.

16.

Dreyfus

Rabinow

(1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. The University of Chicago Press.

17.

Fairbanks

(2009) How It Works: Recovering Citizens in Post-Welfare Philadelphia. University of Chicago Press.

18.

Fairbanks

(2011) The politics of urban informality in Philadelphia’s Recovery House Movement. Urban Studies 48(12): 2555–2570.

19.

Foucault

(1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777–795.

20.

Goodling

Green

McClintock

(2015) Uneven development of the sustainable city: Shifting capital in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geography 36(4): 504–527.

21.

Hagerman

(2007) Shaping neighborhoods and nature: Urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon. Cities 24(4): 285–297.

22.

Harnish

(2019) New Portland Rules could abolish free hot soup for homeless people in Director Park. Willamette Week, October 25. Available at: https://www.wweek.com/news/city/2019/10/25/new-portland-rules-could-abolish-free-hot-soup-for-homeless-people-in-director-park/ (accessed 20 March 2023).

23.

Hasenfeld

Garrow

(2012) Nonprofit human-service organizations, social rights, and advocacy in a neoliberal welfare state. Social Service Review 86(2): 295–322.

24.

Hendrickson

(2022) Rents are climbing fastest in Portland, Oregon; Austin, Texas; and New York City. Mansion Global. Available at: https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/rents-are-climbing-fastest-in-portland-oregon-austin-texas-and-new-york-city-01650482005 (accessed 20 March 2023).

25.

Houdt

Schinkel

(2014) Crime, citizenship and community: Neoliberal communitarian images of governmentality. Sociological Review 62(1): 47–67.

26.

HUD (2024) Annual Homelessness Assessment Report, Part 1 – PIT estimates of homelessness in the US. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/ahar/2024-ahar-part-1-pit-estimates-of-homelessness-in-the-us.html (accessed 5 September 2025).

27.

Ilcan

Basok

(2004) Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilisation of citizens. Citizenship Studies 8(2): 129–144.

28.

Johnsen

(2014) Where’s the ‘faith’ in ‘faith-based’ organisations? The evolution and practice of faith-based homelessness services in the UK. Journal of Social Policy 43(2): 413–430.

29.

Juhila

Raitakari

Hansen Löfstrand

(2017) Responsabilization in governmentality literature. In: Juhila

Raitakari

Hall

(eds) Responsibilisation at the Margins of Welfare Services. Routledge, pp. 11–34.

30.

Lancione

(2016) The assemblage of life at the margins. In: Lancione

(ed.) Rethinking Life at the Margins. Routledge, pp. 3–25.

31.

Laurenson

Collins

(2007) Beyond punitive regulation? New Zealand local governments’ responses to homelessness. Antipode 39(4): 649–667.

32.

Lemke

(2001) The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society 30(2): 190–207.

33.

Margier

(2023) The institutionalization of ‘tiny home’ villages in Portland: Innovative solution to address homelessness or preclusion of radical housing practices? Cities 137: 104333.

34.

Margier

(2024) Challenging the ‘reticent state’? Grassroots organizations, COVID-19 and the local government. Cities 149: 104997.

35.

Marwell

(2004) Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review 69(2): 265–291.

36.

Marwell

Gullickson

(2013) Inequality in the spatial allocation of social services: Government contracts to nonprofit in New York City. Social Service Review 87(2): 319–353.

37.

May

Cloke

(2014) Modes of attentiveness: Reading for difference in geographies of homelessness. Antipode 46(4): 894–920.

38.

Mesh

(2019) Volunteers sue Portland City Hall over requiring permits to serve free hot soup. Willamette Week, 27 November. Available at: https://www.wweek.com/news/courts/2019/11/27/volunteers-sue-portland-city-hall-over-requiring-permits-to-serve-free-hot-soup/ (accessed 5 September 2025).

39.

Mongeau Hugues

(2025) Homelessness continues to rise in Portland area even as increased services help thousands. The Oregonian, 20 May. Available at: https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2025/05/homelessness-continues-to-rise-in-portland-area-even-as-increased-services-help-thousands.html (accessed 29 September 2025).

40.

Multnomah County (2022) Beacon Village Alternative Shelter Program. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIuXGx2kWUE (accessed 19 March 2023).

41.

Osborne

Rose

(1999) Governing cities: Notes on the spatialization of virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17: 737–760.

42.

Peck

Tickell

(2002) Neoliberalizing space. In: Brenner

Theodore

(eds) Spaces of Neoliberalism. Blackwell Press, pp. 33–57.

43.

Peel

(2022) Wait time for city of Portland’s affordable apartments is five years. Willamette Week, 19 October. Available at: https://www.wweek.com/news/city/2022/10/19/wait-time-for-city-of-portlands-affordable-apartments-is-five-years/ (accessed 5 September 2025).

44.

Portland Housing Bureau (2021) State of housing in Portland. Available at: https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2022/phb-soh-2021-web.pdf (accessed 5 September 2025).

45.

Power

Hall

(2018) Placing care in times of austerity. Social and Cultural Geography 19(3): 303–313.

46.

Power

Wiesel

Mitchell

, et al. (2022) Shadow care infrastructures: Sustaining life in post-welfare cities. Progress in Human Geography 46(5): 1165–1184.

47.

Raco

Imrie

(2000) Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning A 32: 2187–2204.

48.

Rodríguez

(2025) Governmentality: The core tendencies in contemporary regulation. Interciencia 50(4): 205–210.

49.

Rose

(2000) Government and control. The British Journal of Criminology 40(2): 321–339.

50.

Rose

Miller

(1992) Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173–205.

51.

Rosol

(2015) Governing cities through participation – a Foucauldian analysis of CityPlan Vancouver. Urban Geography 36(2): 256–276.

52.

Teghtsoonian

(2009) Depression and mental health in neoliberal times: A critical analysis of policy and discourse. Social Science & Medicine 69(2009): 28–35.

53.

Tonkens

(2011) The embrace of responsibility. In: Newman

Tonkens

(eds) Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam University Press, pp. 45–65.

54.

Trudeau

(2008) Towards a relational view of the shadow state. Political Geography 27(6): 669–690.

55.

Wolch

(1990) The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition. Foundation Center.

56.

Zapata

Liu

Everett

, et al. (2019) Governance, costs, and revenue raising to address and prevent homelessness in the Portland tri-county region. Report, Portland State University. Available at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/nerc_pub/40/ (accessed 2 October 2025).

57.

Zielinski

(2021) “Small gestures of trust”: What was learned and lost in creating Portland’s emergency homeless villages. Portland Mercury, 14 December. Available at: https://www.portlandmercury.com/Housing/2021/12/14/37410751/small-gestures-of-trust-what-was-learned-and-lost-in-creating-portlands-emergency-homeless-villages (accessed 22 October 2025).

Growth and flexibility at the margins? The voluntary sector and civil society in post-welfare Portland

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References