Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Chinese

Similar to other US cities, publicly funded highways and urban renewal projects destroyed many thriving Black neighbourhoods in Richmond, Virginia (USA), including the Navy Hill neighbourhood. In 2017, invoking the name of the former neighbourhood as a branding tactic and framing the redevelopment project as critical to the city’s success, a public–private redevelopment proposal sparked debate around the goals and processes of planning and ignited community resistance. This article analyses interviews and contemporary and archival documents to gain insight into the case and to develop the historical context important for understanding Navy Hill. Building on scholarship that considers the nature of justice in urban development decisions and the role of community resistance in shaping the process and outcomes of these projects, we use Marcuse’s framework for social change and theories on power, process and place in decision making to examine the Navy Hill process. Results highlight the power of community-based disruption to resist growth-orientated development rhetoric, successfully politicise the problems of the redevelopment proposal and rewrite the culture of public–private redevelopment processes.

Keywords

justice memory power redevelopment resistance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arriaza

(2020) Navy Hill torpedoed. Richmond Magazine, 10 April. Available at: https://richmondmagazine.com/news/news/navy-hill-torpedoed/ (accessed 25 July 2022).

Beauregard

(2015) Planning Matter: Acting with Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Brand

(2015) The politics of defining and building equity in the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Education and Research 35(3): 249–264.

Chiles

(2022) Reenvisioning Richmond’s past: Race, reconciliation, and public history in the modern south, 1990–present. Journal of Southern History 88(4): 707–752.

Chiles

(2023) The Struggle for Change: Race and the Politics of Reconciliation in Modern Richmond. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

City of Richmond (2017) Pulse Corridor Plan. Richmond, Virginia. Available at: https://www.rva.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/PulseCorridorPlan-July2017.pdf (accessed 25 July 2022).

City of Richmond (2022) Strategic Plan for Equitable Economic Development (SPEED). Available at: https://www.rva.gov/economic-development/speed (accessed 25 July 2022).

Clay

Hill

(2023) The predatory rhetorics of urban development: Neoliberalism and the illusory promise of black middle-class communities. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 20(2): 371–390.

Cresswell

(2009) Place. In: Thrift

Kitchin

(eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.169–177.

10.

Davidoff

(1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(4): 331–338.

11.

De Barbieri

(2015) Do community benefits agreements benefit communities? Cardozo Law Review 37: 1773–1825.

12.

Doucet

(2013) Variations of the entrepreneurial city: Goals, roles and visions in Rotterdam’s Kop van Zuid and the Glasgow Harbour Megaprojects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(6): 2035–2051.

13.

Doussard

Schrock

(2023) Economic and racial justice coalitions and the rise of progressive cities. Journal of Urban Affairs 47(3): 961–977.

14.

Fainstein

(2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

15.

Fischler

(2012) The idea of reflective practice in historical perspective. In: Bishwapriya

Vale

Rosan

(eds) Planning Ideas That Matter: Livability, Territoriality, Governance, and Reflective Practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.313–323.

16.

Friedman

(1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

17.

Gough

Howell

Cameron

(2022) The structural challenge of power and whiteness in planning: Evidence from historic Black cemetery restoration. Planning Theory & Practice 23(4): 536–555.

18.

Hartman

(2008) Venus in two acts. Small Axe 12(2) 1–14.

19.

Hayter

(2017) The Dream Is Lost: Voting Rights and the Politics of Race in Richmond, Virginia. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

20.

Hirsh

Eizenberg

Jabareen

(2020) A new conceptual framework for understanding displacement: Bridging the gaps in displacement literature between the Global South and the Global North. Journal of Planning Literature 35(4): 391–407.

21.

Holden

Scerri

Esfahani

(2015) Justifying redevelopment ‘failures’ within urban ‘success stories’: Dispute, compromise, and a new test of urbanity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(3): 451–470.

22.

Howe

(1994) Acting on Ethics in City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.

23.

Howell

Gough

Cameron

(2023) “Why are we asking for a seat at the table that our ancestors created for us?”: The importance of cultural landscapes and power in urban planning. Journal of Urban Affairs 47(4): 1287–1308.

24.

Immergluck

(2022) Red Hot City: Housing, Race, and Exclusion in Twenty-First-Century Atlanta. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

25.

Kim

(2023) Taking stock of what we know about large-scale urban development projects: A review of existing theoretical frameworks and case studies. Journal of Planning Literature 38(2): 171–186.

26.

Kollatz

Jr (2019) The original Navy Hill. Richmond Magazine, 29 December. Available at: https://richmondmagazine.com/api/content/cc4f04f2-227f-11ea-be76-1244d5f7c7c6/ (accessed 25 July 2022).

27.

Krumholz

Forester

(1990) Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

28.

Lake

(2016) Justice as subject and object of planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(6): 1205–1220.

29.

McKittrick

(2006) Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

30.

Marcuse

(2009) From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13(2–3): 185–197.

31.

Martz

(2017) Richmond Mayor Stoney announces major downtown redevelopment plan centered on new, larger Coliseum. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 9 November. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/local/city-of-richmond/richmond-mayor-stoney-announces-major-downtown-redevelopment-plan-centered-on/article_94bac7fb-b6c7-5b89-be12-9623fd44f1c2.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

32.

Mattingly

(2019) Experts: VCU president’s ghostwritten Coliseum column raises ethics, academic integrity concerns. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 6 September. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/experts-vcu-presidents-ghostwritten-coliseum-column-raises-ethics-academic-integrity-concerns/article_c1ecab0b-27a4-5385-8df9-f5664b986f78.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

33.

Melnick

Roberts

Mcgilvray

(2021) Integrity as process and feature: Cultural landscapes of underrepresented communities. Change Over Time 10(2): 122–140.

34.

Miraftab

(2009) Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south. Planning Theory 8(1): 32–50.

35.

Mitchell , Wiggins & Company, LLP (2016) Richmond Coliseum Financial Schedules: June 30, 2016 and 2015. Richmond, VA: Mitchell, Wiggins & Company.

36.

Moeser

(2010) Unpacking the Census: Part 3. Available at: www.unpackingthecensus.org (accessed 12 April 2023).

37.

Moeser

Dennis

(2020) The Politics of Annexation: Oligarchic Power in a Southern City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

38.

Moulton

(2021) Black monument matters: Place-based commemoration and abolitionist memory work. Sociology Compass 15(12): e12944.

39.

Navy Hill Development Advisory Commission (2019) Navy Hill Development Advisory Commission report. Available at: https://www.navyhillcommission.org/Navy_Hill_Development_Advisory_Commission_Final_Report.pdf (accessed 23 July 2022).

40.

NH District Corporation (2018) North of Broad/Downtown redevelopment proposal, 9 February.

41.

Pell

(2014) Mobilizing urban publics, imagining democratic possibilities: Reading the politics of urban redevelopment in discourses of gentrification and revitalization. Cultural Studies 28: 29–48.

42.

Porter

Sandercock

Umemoto

, et al. (2012) What’s love got to do with it? Illuminations on loving attachment in planning. Planning Theory & Practice 13(4): 593–627.

43.

Quick

Feldman

(2011) Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research 31(3): 272–290.

44.

Rast

(2015) Urban regime theory and the problem of change. Urban Affairs Review 51(1): 138–149.

45.

Reece

Gough

(2019) Planning for regional sustainability and justice: The role of collective impact. Community Development 50(3): 368–386.

46.

Richardson

(2007) Built By Blacks: African American Architecture and Neighborhoods in Richmond. Charleston, SC: History Press

47.

Richmond Afro-American (1966) Marsh says expressway plan anti-colored. Richmond Afro-American, 1 November, p. 12.

48.

Richmond Times (1965) Decision expected on school’s fate. Richmond Times Dispatch, 14 September, p. 2.

49.

Roane

(2022) Black ecologies, subaquatic life, and the Jim Crow enclosure of the tidewater. Journal of Rural Studies 94: 227–238.

50.

Roberts

(2018) Performance as place preservation: The role of storytelling in the formation of Shankleville Community’s Black counterpublics. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 5(3): 146–165.

51.

Roberts

Kelly

(2019) Remixing as praxis: Arnstein’s ladder through the grassroots preservationist’s lens. Journal of the American Planning Association 85(3): 301–320.

52.

Robinson

(2019) On Racial Capitalism, Black Internationalism, and Cultures of Resistance. London: Pluto Press.

53.

Robinson

(2019) UPDATED: Federal complaint filed against developers of $1.5 billion Navy Hill plan. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 18 November. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/local/updated-federal-complaint-filed-against-developers-of-1-5-billion-navy-hill-plan/article_60cc8516-25de-5dfc-8c7d-d92be2044835.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

54.

Robinson

(2020a) CoStar Group eyes expansion as part of $1.5B Navy Hill project. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 13 January. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/local/costar-group-eyes-expansion-as-part-of-1-5b-navy-hill-project/article_5e9dfde1-5a62-5e4f-8ba6-612a6fc0a4d3.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

55.

Robinson

(2020b) Richmond City Council killed the Navy Hill deal Monday night; this is what happens next. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 11 February. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/local/richmond-city-council-killed-the-navy-hill-deal-monday-night-this-is-what-happens-next/article_2d3cecef-4f6a-58d9-ab30-76848e6dcb0f.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

56.

Silver

(1984) Twentieth-Century Richmond: Planning, Politics, and Race. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

57.

Silver

Crowley

(1991) Revitalizing the urban south neighborhood preservation and planning since the 1920s. Journal of the American Planning Association 57(1): 69–84.

58.

Silver

Moeser

(1995) The Separate City: Black Communities in the Urban South, 1940–1968. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

59.

Sweet

Harper-Anderson

(2023) Race, space, and trauma: Using community accountability for healing justice. Journal of the American Planning Association 89(4): 554–565.

60.

Virginia DHCD (2018) Governor Northam announces nomination of 212 opportunity zones. Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. Available at: https://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/opportunity-zones-oz (accessed 23 July 2022).

61.

Walden

(2021) Richmond racial equity essays. Available at: https://richmondracialequityessays.com/2021-essays (accessed 15 March 2024).

62.

Watt

Morris

(2024) Special Feature: Putting urban displacement in its place. City 28(1–2): 161–188.

63.

Williams

(2018) Stoney makes the case for an inclusive Coliseum-area redevelopment. But is it too good to be true? Richmond Times-Dispatch, 1 November. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/williams-stoney-makes-the-case-for-an-inclusive-coliseum-area-redevelopment-but-is-it-too/article_26c3bc88-1ec2-5bee-bcec-36c2d93aa8fb.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

64.

Williams

(2019a) Yes, money changed hands to put NH District Corp. Supporters in the room. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 1 November. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/williams-yes-money-changed-hands-to-put-nh-district-corp-supporters-in-the-room/article_151b508e-cabf-5835-9943-60c1c263adc7.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

65.

Williams

(2019b) If we can’t trust the small stuff about the Coliseum plan, we can’t trust the big stuff. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 10 September. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/williams-if-we-cant-trust-the-small-stuff-about-the-coliseum-plan-we-cant-trust/article_300ecaa7-7d80-5479-b623-d8cbff4d5269.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

66.

Williams

(2020a) Miscalculations are sinking the Navy Hill project. It needs a course correction. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 31 January. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/williams-miscalculations-are-sinking-the-navy-hill-project-it-needs-a-course-correction/article_c10d5996-30cf-5391-b0a6-ae011a5e1281.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

67.

Williams

(2020b) Black ministers blessed the Navy Hill project. But is faith alone enough to justify it? Richmond Times-Dispatch, 24 January. Available at: https://richmond.com/news/plus/williams-black-ministers-blessed-the-navy-hill-project-but-is-faith-alone-enough-to-justify/article_94127f6c-42c9-5ca1-850a-902cc3a53f5d.html (accessed 23 July 2022).

68.

Williams

(2020) From racial to reparative planning: Confronting the white side of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 44(1): 64–74.

69.

Wolf-Powers

(2010) Community benefits agreements and local government: A review of recent evidence. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(2): 141–159.

70.

Yerena

(2023) Strategic action for affordable housing: How advocacy organizations accomplish policy change. Journal of Planning Education and Research 43(3): 468–481.

71.

Young

(2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Resisting desperation for development: The power of community-based disruption in rewriting the culture of public–private redevelopment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References