This paper examines whether and how housing market dynamics shape landlords’ profit-seeking behaviours, focusing on harassment and property neglect. Leveraging household survey data, we assess whether differences between market and contract rents, rent control and gentrification influence landlord behaviour. Findings reveal that one-quarter of respondents reported inadequate maintenance from landlords within the past two years, and more than one-fifth reported at least one form of harassment. However, the incidence of these issues varied across contexts. Tenants in rent-controlled buildings and gentrifying census tracts were 14.8 and 9.4 percentage points more likely than peers not in those situations to experience harassment, respectively. Moreover, rent-controlled tenants were more likely to experience illegal eviction practices while those in gentrifying tracts were more likely to experience threats and assault. In contrast, paying lower rents relative to market estimates alone was not associated with a greater likelihood of refusal to provide maintenance and a lower likelihood of harassment. These results suggest that landlords respond in illegal ways when frictions in the market make it difficult to simply increase rents in response to strengthening market conditions.
AngstS (2022) Affordable South Los Angeles: Survival, Support, and Different Futures. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
2.
AngstSRosenJDe GregorioSet al. (2024) How do renters survive unaffordability? Household-level impacts of rent burden in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs:1–24.
3.
AutorDHPalmerCJPathakPA (2014) Housing market spillovers: Evidence from the end of rent control in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Journal of Political Economy122(3): 661–717.
4.
BetancurJ (2011) Gentrification and community fabric in Chicago. Urban Studies48(2): 383–406.
5.
BrummetQReedD (2019) The effects of gentrification on the well-being and opportunity of original resident adults and children. Federal Reserve Board of Philadelphia working paper no. 19-30.
ChenRJiangHQuinteroLE (2023) Measuring the value of rent stabilization and understanding its implications for racial inequality: Evidence from New York City. Regional Science and Urban Economics103: 103948.
9.
ChisholmEHowden-ChapmanPFougereG (2020) Tenants’ responses to substandard housing: Hidden and invisible power and the failure of rental housing regulation. Housing Theory and Society37(2): 139–161.
10.
ChristophersB (2022) Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfaces. Urban Studies59(4): 698–716.
DesmondMShollenbergerT (2015) Forced displacement from rental housing: Prevalence and neighborhood consequences. Demography52(5): 1751–1772.
13.
DiamondRMcQuadeTQianF (2019) The effects of rent control expansion on tenants, landlords, and inequality: Evidence from San Francisco. American Economic Review109(9): 3365–3394.
FreemanL (2006) There Goes the Hood: Views of Gentrification From the Ground Up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
GarbodenPMRosenE (2019) Serial filing: How landlords use the threat of eviction. City and Community18(2): 638–661.
19.
GibbonsJBartonMS (2016) The association of minority self-rated health with black versus white gentrification. Journal of Urban Health93(6): 909–922.
20.
GraetzNGershensonCHepburnPet al. (2023) A comprehensive demographic profile of the US evicted population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120(41): e2305860120.
21.
GromisADesmondM (2021) Estimating the prevalence of eviction in the United States. Cityscape23(2): 279–290.
22.
GyourkoJLinnemanP (1989) Equity and efficiency aspects of rent control: An empirical study of New York City. Journal of Urban Economics26(1): 54–74.
23.
HallMGreenmanE (2013) Housing and neighborhood quality among undocumented Mexican and Central American immigrants. Social Science Research42(6): 1712–1725.
24.
HuynhMMarokoAR (2014) Gentrification and preterm birth in New York City, 2008–2010. Journal of Urban Health91(1): 211–220.
25.
HyraDMouldenDWetedCet al. (2019) A method for making the just city: Housing, gentrification, and health. Housing Policy Debate29(3): 421–431.
26.
ImmergluckDLawJ (2014) Investing in crisis: The methods, strategies, and expectations of investors in single-family foreclosed homes in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate24(3): 568–593.
27.
IzenbergJMMujahidMSYenIH (2018) Health in changing neighborhoods: A study of the relationship between gentrification and self-rated health in the state of California. Health & Place52: 188–195.
28.
Korver-GlennE (2018) Compounding inequalities: How racial stereotypes and discrimination accumulate across the stages of housing exchange. American Sociological Review83(4): 627–656.
29.
KriegerJHigginsDL (2002) Housing and health: Time again for public health action. American Journal of Public Health92(5): 758–768.
MallachA (2014) Lessons from Las Vegas: Housing markets, neighborhoods, and distressed single-family property investors. Housing Policy Debate24(4): 769–801.
35.
Neighborhood Data for Social Change (NDSC) (2019) Census tract data. Available at: https://map.myneighborhooddata.org/ (accessed 19 March 2019).
36.
OlsenEO (1972) An econometric analysis of rent control. Journal of Political Economy80(6): 1081–1100.
37.
PreisBJanakiramanABobAet al. (2021) Mapping gentrification and displacement pressure: An exploration of four distinct methodologies. Urban Studies58(2): 405–424.
38.
QGIS Development Team (2023) QGIS: A free and open-source geographic information system (Version 3.32). Available at: https://qgis.org (accessed 17 July 2018).
39.
RamillerA (2022) Displacement through development? Property turnover and eviction risk in Seattle. Urban Studies59(6): 1148–1166.
40.
RaymondEDuckworthRMillerBet al. (2018) From foreclosure to eviction: Housing insecurity in corporate-owned single-family rentals. Cityscape20(3): 159–188.
41.
Rentometer (2019) House and apartment rental rate comps. Available at: https://www.rentometer.com (accessed 1 April 2019).
42.
RosenJCiudad-RealVAngstSet al. (2023) Rental affordability, coping strategies, and impacts in diverse immigrant communities. Housing Policy Debate 33(6): 1313–1332.
43.
Rucks-AhidianaZ (2022) Theorizing gentrification as a process of racial capitalism. City and Community21(3): 173–192.
44.
SharkeyP (2013) Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress Toward Racial Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
SimsDP (2007) Out of control: What can we learn from the end of Massachusetts rent control?Journal of Urban Economics61(1): 129–151.
46.
SlaterT (2021) Shaking Up the City: Ignorance, Inequality, and the Urban Question. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
47.
SmithN (1979) Toward a theory of gentrification a back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association45(4): 538–548.
48.
SmithN (1984) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
49.
TravisA (2019) The organization of neglect: Limited liability companies and housing disinvestment. American Sociological Review84(1): 142–170.
50.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (2019) Small-area fair market rents 2019. Available at: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr.html (accessed 12 August 2019).
ZukMBierbaumAHChappleKet al. (2018) Gentrification, displacement, and the role of public investment. Journal of Planning Literature33(1): 31–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
