Emerging work in fiscal sociology examines the intersection of race/ethnicity, inequality and taxation, and suggests that localities are increasingly turning to nontax alternatives such as fines, fees and forfeitures to fill revenue gaps and service demands. These revenue sources are regressive and discriminatory as they disproportionately affect low-income racially/ethnically minoritised groups. We assess the extent to which local municipalities in California are more dependent on regressive nontax revenue sources, and if increases are correlated with a city’s racial/ethnic composition. We use fixed-effects estimators on panel fiscal data from the California State Controller Office’s Cities Annual Reports between 2002 and 2016 for our analysis. We further exploit our time period to determine how fiscal crises like the Great Recession compound race/ethnicity-driven finance disparities. Our results suggest the proportion of Latinx/Hispanic in a city’s population is positively and statistically associated with an increase in a city’s reliance on fines, fees and forfeitures. These results suggest concerns of discriminatory and regressive revenue sourcing by local governments that further perpetuate racial inequality and poverty. In aggregate, relative to other years in our analysis, the growth rate of fines, fees and forfeitures as a portion of total own-source revenue saw higher increases during the Great Recession, a time of heightened financial insecurity among low-income, Latinx/Hispanic and Black households.
AdkissonRVMohammedM (2014) Tax structure and state economic growth during the Great Recession. The Social Science Journal51(1): 79–89.
2.
BargainOCallanTDoorleyK, et al. (2017) Changes in income distributions and the role of tax-benefit policy during the Great Recession: An international perspective. Fiscal Studies38(4): 559–585.
3.
BerchN (1995) Explaining changes in tax incidence in the states. Political Research Quarterly48(3): 629–641.
4.
BitlerMHoynesHKukuE (2017) Child poverty, the Great Recession, and the social safety net in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management36(2): 358–389.
5.
BrazilN (2018) The unequal spatial distribution of city government fines: The case of parking tickets in Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Review. Epub ahead of print 22June2018. DOI: 10.1177/1078087418783609
6.
BrownDA (2021) The Whiteness of Wealth: How the Tax System Impoverishes Black Americans—and How We Can Fix It. New York: Crown.
7.
CampbellJL (1993) The state and fiscal sociology. Annual Review of Sociology19(1): 163–185.
8.
ChernickHReimersCTennantJ (2014) Tax structure and revenue instability: The Great Recession and the states. IZA Journal of Labor Policy3(1): 1–22.
9.
ColganBA (2017) Fines, fees, and forfeitures. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society18(3): 22–40.
10.
CynamonBZFazzariSM (2016) Inequality, the Great Recession and slow recovery. Cambridge Journal of Economics40(2): 373–399.
11.
DericksonKD (2016) The racial state and resistance in Ferguson and beyond. Urban Studies53(11): 2223–2237.
12.
DovidioJFGluszekAJohnM-S, et al. (2010) Understanding bias toward Latinos: Discrimination, dimensions of difference, and experience of exclusion. Journal of Social Issues66(1): 59–78.
13.
EppCRMaynard-MoodySHaider-MarkelDP (2014) Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GaleWG (2021) Public finance and racism. National Tax Journal74(4): 953–974.
15.
GamkharSPickerillJM (2012) The state of American federalism 2011–2012: A fend for yourself and activist form of bottom-up federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism42(3): 357–386.
16.
GoldsteinRSancesMWYouHY (2018) Exploitative revenues, law enforcement, and the quality of government service. Urban Affairs Review. Epub ahead of print 11August2018. DOI: 10.1177/1078087418791775
17.
GrahamSRMakowskyMD (2021) Local government dependence on criminal justice revenue and emerging constraints. Annual Review of Criminology4(1): 311–330.
18.
HallMKrysanM (2017) The neighborhood context of Latino threat. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity3(2): 218–235.
19.
HarrisA (2016) A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
HarrisAEvansHBeckettK (2011) Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: Toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. American Sociological Review76(2): 234–264.
21.
HendrickR (2006) The role of slack in local government finances. Public Budgeting & Finance26(1): 14–46.
22.
HenricksKHarveyDC (2017) Not one but many: Monetary punishment and the Fergusons of America. Sociological Forum32(S1): 930–951.
23.
HenricksKSeamsterL (2017) Mechanisms of the racial tax state. Critical Sociology43(2): 169–179.
24.
HoynesHMillerDLSchallerJ (2012) Who suffers during recessions?Journal of Economic Perspectives26(3): 27–48.
25.
JacobsDWaldmanD (1983) Toward a fiscal sociology: Determinants of tax regressivity in the American states. social Science Quarterly64(3): 550–565.
JonesE (2018) Racism, fines and fees and the US carceral state. Race & Class59(3): 38–50.
28.
JungCBaeS (2011) Changing revenue and expenditure structure and the reliance on user charges and fees in American counties, 1972–2002. The American Review of Public Administration41(1): 92–110.
29.
KatoJ (2003) Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KimY (2018) Can alternative service delivery save cities after the Great Recession? Barriers to privatisation and cooperation. Local Government Studies44(1): 44–63.
31.
KimYWarnerME (2018) Geographies of local government stress after the Great Recession. Social Policy and Administration52(1): 365–386.
32.
LeeCA (2021) “Working towards a better future for ourselves”: Neighborhood choice of middle-class Latino and Asian homeowners in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs43(7): 941–959.
33.
MartinKDSykesBLShannonS, et al. (2018) Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in US systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology1(1): 471–495.
MenjívarCSimmonsWPAlvordD, et al. (2018) Immigration enforcement, the racialization of legal status, and perceptions of the police. Du Bois Review Social Science Research on Race15(1): 107–128.
36.
MughanS (2021) Municipal reliance on fine and fee revenues: How local courts contribute to extractive revenue practices in US cities. Public Budgeting & Finance41(2): 22–44.
37.
O’BrienRL (2017) Redistribution and the new fiscal sociology: Race and the progressivity of state and local taxes. American Journal of Sociology122(4): 1015–1049.
38.
ParkS (2017) Local revenue structure under economic hardship: Reliance on alternative revenue sources in California counties. Local Government Studies43(4): 645–667.
39.
ParradoEA (2012) Immigration enforcement policies, the economic recession, and the size of local Mexican immigrant populations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science641(1): 16–37.
40.
PickettJT (2016) On the social foundations for crimmigration: Latino threat and support for expanded police powers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology32(1): 103–132.
41.
PrykeMAllenJ (2019) Financialising urban water infrastructure: Extracting local value, distributing value globally. Urban Studies56(7): 1326–1346.
RoseEK (2021) Who gets a second chance? Effectiveness and equity in supervision of criminal offenders. The Quarterly Journal of Economics136(2): 1199–1253.
44.
RossJYanWJohnsonC (2015) The public financing of America’s largest cities: A study of city financial records in the wake of the Great Recession. Journal of Regional Science55(1): 113–138.
45.
SancesMWYouHY (2017) Who pays for government? Descriptive representation and exploitative revenue sources. The Journal of Politics79(3): 1090–1094.
46.
SchumpeterJA (1918) The crisis of the tax state. In: SchumpeterJA (ed.) The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.99–140.
47.
SharpEB (2014) Minority representation and order maintenance policing: Toward a contingent view. Social Science Quarterly95(4): 1155–1171.
48.
ShoubKChristianiLBaumgartnerFR, et al. (2021) Fines, fees, forfeitures, and disparities: A link between municipal reliance on fines and racial disparities in policing. Policy Studies Journal49(3): 835–859.
49.
SinglaAKirschnerCStoneSB (2020) Race, representation, and revenue: Reliance on fines and forfeitures in city governments. Urban Affairs Review56(4): 1132–1167.
50.
SuM (2020) Taxation by citation? Exploring local governments’ revenue motive for traffic fines. Public Administration Review80(1): 36–45.
VaqueraEArandaEGonzalesRG (2014) Patterns of incorporation of Latinos in old and new destinations: From invisible to hypervisible. American Behavioral Scientist58(14): 1823–1833.
55.
VidalesGDayKMPoweM (2009) Police and immigration enforcement: Impacts on Latino(a) residents’ perceptions of police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management32(4): 631–653.
56.
WalshC (2018) Racial Taxation: Schools, Segregation, and Taxpayer Citizenship, 1869–1973. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
