The classical monocentric city model suggests that property prices decrease and transport costs rise with distance to the urban centre, implying that employees face a trade-off between long commutes and high housing costs when making location decisions. Accordingly, some commuters might be forced to take on longer commutes due to rising rents in central locations. In this study, we investigate empirically whether the rental differential between employment centres and residential areas predicts changes in average commuting times. To this end, we consider a gravity model of commuting flows for Ireland over 2011–2016. We present results for Ireland and the metropolitan area of Dublin, which constitutes the largest commuting region in Ireland. The results imply that a 10% rise in rents in employment centres is associated with an up to 0.6 minute rise in one-way daily average commuting times nationally (about 2.2% of the average commute duration).
AhlfeldtGMWendlandN (2016) The spatial decay in commuting probabilities: employment potential vs. commuting gravity. Economics Letters143: 125–129.
2.
AhlfeldtGMReddingSJSturmDM, et al. (2015) The economics of density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall. Econometrica83(6): 2127–2189.
3.
AhrensAHansenCBSchafferME (2018) PDSLASSO: Stata module for post-selection and post-regularization OLS or IV estimation and inference. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458459.html (accessed 4 March 2020).
4.
AhrensAHansenCBSchafferME (2019) lassopack: Model selection and prediction with regularized regression in Stata. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05397 (accessed 4 March 2020).
5.
AlbouyDLueB (2015) Driving to opportunity: Local rents, wages, commuting, and sub-metropolitan quality of life. Journal of Urban Economics89: 74–92.
6.
AlonsoW (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
AntipovaAWangFWilmotC (2011) Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach. Applied Geography31(3): 1010–1018.
8.
BelloniAChernozhukovVHansenC (2014) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Review of Economic Studies81: 608–650.
9.
BelloniAChernozhukovVHansenC, et al. (2016) Inference in high dimensional panel models with an application to gun control. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics34(4): 590–605.
10.
BorgersenTSommervollD (2012) Housing careers, price–rent ratios and rental equivalence. Housing, Theory and Society29(3): 276–287.
11.
CerveroRWuKL (1997) Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space29(5): 865–886.
12.
CheshirePHilberCAKosterHR (2018) Empty homes, longer commutes: The unintended consequences of more restrictive local planning. Journal of Public Economics158: 126–151.
13.
ComminsNNolanA (2011) The determinants of mode of transport to work in the Greater Dublin Area. Transport Policy18(1): 259–268.
CraneR (2007) Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association73(3): 298–316.
16.
De VriesJJNijkampPRietveldP (2009) Exponential or power distance-decay for commuting? An alternative specification. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space41(2): 461–480.
17.
Duran-FernandezRSantosG (2014) Gravity, distance, and traffic flows in Mexico. Research in Transportation Economics46: 30–35.
GuimarãesP (2008) The fixed effects negative binomial model revisited. Economics Letters99(1): 63–66.
20.
HilberCAVermeulenW (2016) The impact of supply constraints on house prices in England. Economic Journal126(591): 358–405.
21.
JohanssonMVHeldtTJohanssonP (2006) The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice40(6): 507–525.
22.
Künn-NelenA (2016) Does commuting affect health?Health Economics25(8): 984–1004.
23.
MaKBanisterD (2006) Excess commuting: A critical review. Transport Reviews26(6): 749–767.
24.
McArthurDPKleppeGThorsenI, et al. (2011a) The impact of monetary costs on commuting flows. Papers in Regional Science92(1): 69–86.
25.
McArthurDPKleppeGThorsenI, et al. (2011b) The spatial transferability of parameters in a gravity model of commuting flows. Journal of Transport Geography19(4): 596–605.
26.
MillsES (1967) An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. The American Economic Review57(2): 197–210. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1821621 (accessed 4 March 2020).
27.
MonteFReddingSJRossi-HansbergE (2018) Commuting, migration, and local employment elasticities. American Economic Review108(12): 3855–3890.
28.
MuthR (1969) Cities and Housing: The Spatial Patterns of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
O’KellyMENiedzielskiMAGleesonJ (2012) Spatial interaction models from Irish commuting data: Variations in trip length by occupation and gender. Journal of Geographical Systems14: 357–387.
30.
OslandLThorsenI (2008) Effects on housing prices of urban attraction and labor-market accessibility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space40(10): 2490–2509.
31.
PersynDTorfsW (2016) A gravity equation for commuting with an application to estimating regional border effects in Belgium. Journal of Economic Geography16(1): 155–175.
SandowEWesterlundOLindgrenU (2014) Is your commute killing you? On the mortality risks of long-distance commuting. Environment and Planning A46(6): 1496–1516.
34.
SaundersLEGreenJMPetticrewMP, et al. (2013) What are the health benefits of active travel? A systematic review of trials and cohort studies. PLoS One8(8): 1–13.
35.
SilvaJMCTenreyroS (2006) The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics88(4): 641–658.
36.
SoKSOrazemPFOttoDM (2001) The effects of housing prices, wages, and commuting time on joint residential and job location choices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics83(4): 1036–1048.
37.
StutzerAFreyBS (2008) Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics110(2): 339–366.
38.
TaylorEJ (2013) Do house values influence resistance to development? A spatial analysis of planning objection and appeals in Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research31(1): 5–26.
39.
TaylorEJHurleyJ (2016) Do objections count? Estimating the influence of residents on housing development assessment in Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research34(3): 269–283.
40.
TibshiraniR (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)58(1): 267–288.
41.
TravisiCMCamagniRNijkampP (2010) Impacts of urban sprawl and commuting: A modelling study for Italy. Journal of Transport Geography18(3): 382–392.
42.
VegaAReynolds-FeighanA (2008) Employment sub-centres and travel-to-work mode choice in the Dublin region. Urban Studies45(9): 1747–1768.
43.
ViegasJMMartinezLMSilvaEA (2009) Effects of the modifiable areal unit problem on the delineation of traffic analysis zones. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36(4): 625–643.
44.
WooldridgeJM (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics90(1): 77–97.
45.
ZuurbierMHoekGOldenweningM, et al. (2010) Commuters’ exposure to particulate matter air pollution is affected by mode of transport, fuel type, and route. Environmental Health Perspectives118(6): 783–789.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
