Cities are important sites for interrogating the social, scalar and spatial dynamics that underpin climate responsibility. To date, however, there is limited theoretical and empirical understanding about how discourses, practices and politics of climate responsibility might be enacted in the urban context. This gap is particularly significant in the Asia Pacific – a region characterised by high rates of economic growth and rapid urbanisation alongside extreme poverty and exposure to the effects of climate change. This article explores the politics of urban climate responsibility in two cities – Hong Kong and Singapore. Based on empirical research with NGOs, it considers if and how cities have a responsibility to act on climate change, how such responsibility may be configured within the city, and the role of international and regional dynamics in creating and maintaining climate responsibility. The article reframes the contested and contingent geographies of urban climate responsibility through the dimensions of attribution, production and spatialisation before drawing out implications for climate justice and resilience in the Asia Pacific region.
Asian Development Bank and World Wide Fund for Nature (2012) Ecological Footprint and Investment in Natural Capital in Asia and the Pacific. Manila: Printing Services ADB.
2.
BaileyI (2017) Spatializing climate justice: Justice claim making and carbon pricing controversies in Australia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(5): 1128–1143.
3.
BulkeleyHCarminJBrotoVC, et al. (2013) Climate justice and global cities: Mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environmental Change23(5): 914–925.
4.
BulkeleyHCastán BrotoVEdwardsG (2015) An Urban Politics of Climate Change. Abingdon: Routledge.
5.
BulkeleyHEdwardsGASFullerS (2014) Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Global Environmental Change25: 31–40.
6.
BulkeleyHLuque-AyalaAMcFarlaneC, et al. (2018) Enhancing urban autonomy: Towards a new political project for cities. Urban Studies55(4): 702–719.
7.
CaneyS (2005) Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law18(4): 747–775.
8.
CaneyS (2010) Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13: 203–228.
9.
CaneyS (2014) Two kinds of climate justice: Avoiding harm and sharing burdens. Journal of Political Philosophy22(2): 125–149.
10.
Castán BrotoVBulkeleyH (2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change23(1): 92–102.
11.
Castán BrotoVWestmanL (2017) Just sustainabilities and local action: Evidence from 400 flagship initiatives. Local Environment22(5): 635–650.
12.
ChattertonPFeatherstoneDRoutledgeP (2013) Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode45(3): 602–620.
13.
ChengNYISoWMW (2015) Environmental governance in Hong Kong – Moving towards multi-level participation. Journal of Asian Public Policy8(3): 297–311.
14.
ChuSYSchroederH (2010) Private governance of climate change in Hong Kong: An analysis of drivers and barriers to corporate action. Asian Studies Review34(3): 287–308.
15.
CrowleyKNakamuraA (2018) Defining regional climate leadership: Learning from comparative analysis in the Asia Pacific. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice20(4): 387–403.
16.
DietzMGarreltsH (2014) Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. Abingdon: Routledge.
17.
DodmanD (2009) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization21(1): 185–201.
18.
ElliottL (2012) ASEAN and environmental governance: Strategies of regionalism in Southeast Asia. Global Environmental Politics12(3): 38–57.
19.
Environment Bureau (2017) Hong Kong’s Climate Action Plan 2030+. Hong Kong: Environment Bureau.
20.
ForsythT (2014) Public concerns about transboundary haze: A comparison of Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia. Global Environmental Change25: 76–86.
21.
Francesch-HuidobroM (2008) Governance, Politics and the Environment: A Singapore Study. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
22.
Francesch-HuidobroM (2012) Institutional deficit and lack of legitimacy: The challenges of climate change governance in Hong Kong. Environmental Politics21(5): 791–810.
23.
FullerS (2017) Configuring climate responsibility in the city: Carbon footprints and climate justice in Hong Kong. Area49: 519–525.
24.
GouldsonAColenbranderSSudmantA, et al. (2016) Cities and climate change mitigation: Economic opportunities and governance challenges in Asia. Cities54: 11–19.
25.
GrubbM (1995) Seeking fair weather: Ethics and the international debate on climate change. International Affairs71(3): 463–496.
26.
HanH (2017) Singapore, a garden city: Authoritarian environmentalism in a developmental state. The Journal of Environment & Development26(1): 3–24.
27.
HarrisPG (2010) Misplaced ethics of climate change: Political vs. environmental geography. Ethics, Place & Environment13(2): 215–222.
28.
HillsPRobertsP (2001) Political integration, transboundary pollution and sustainability: Challenges for environmental policy in the Pearl River Delta region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management44(4): 455–473.
29.
HobsonK (2006) Enacting environmental justice in Singapore: Performative justice and the green volunteer network. Geoforum37(5): 671–681.
30.
HulmeM (2009) Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Lam-KnottS (2018) Anti-hierarchical activism in Hong Kong: The post-80s youth. Social Movement Studies17(4): 464–470.
32.
LeeT (2010) The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore. New York: Routledge.
33.
LoAYFrancesch-HuidobroM (2017) Governing climate change in Hong Kong: Prospects for market mechanisms in the context of emissions trading in China. Asia Pacific Viewpoint58(3): 379–387.
34.
McCannEWardK (2012) Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(1): 42–51.
35.
McGuirkPMBulkeleyHDowlingR (2016) Configuring urban carbon governance: Insights from Sydney, Australia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers106(1): 145–166.
36.
MahDN-yHillsP (2016) An international review of local governance for climate change: Implications for Hong Kong. Local Environment21(1): 39–64.
37.
MarkowitzEMShariffAF (2012) Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change2(4): 243–247.
38.
MasseyD (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography86(1): 5–18.
39.
Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and Ministry of National Development (2016) Singapore’s Climate Action Plan: A Climate-resilient Singapore, for a Sustainable Future. Singapore: Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources and Ministry of National Development.
40.
National Climate Change Secretariat (2012) Climate Change & Singapore: Challenges. Opportunities. Partnerships. Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office.
41.
NewellPBulkeleyHTurnerK, et al. (2015) Governance traps in climate change politics: Re-framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change6(6): 535–540.
42.
NgMK (2012) A critical review of Hong Kong’s proposed climate change strategy and action agenda. Cities29(2): 88–98.
43.
NoxoloPRaghuramPMadgeC (2012) Unsettling responsibility: Postcolonial interventions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers37(3): 418–429.
44.
OngA (2007) Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32(1): 3–8.
45.
OoiGLHeeL (2002) Public space and the developmental state in Singapore. International Development Planning Review24(4): 433–447.
46.
PatersonMStrippleJ (2010) My space: Governing individuals’ carbon emissions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(2): 341–362.
47.
RaghuramPMadgeCNoxoloP (2009) Rethinking responsibility and care for a postcolonial world. Geoforum40(1): 5–13.
48.
RenJLugerJ (2015) Comparative urbanism and the ‘Asian city’: Implications for research and theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(1): 145–156.
49.
RiceJL (2016) ‘The everyday choices we make matter’: Urban carbon politics and the post-politics of responsibility and action. In: BulkeleyHPattersonMStrippleJ (eds) Towards a Cultural Politics of Climate Change: Devices, Desires, and Dissent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–126.
50.
SadowayD (2013) How are ICTs transforming civic space in Singapore?Journal of Creative Communications8(2–3): 107–138.
51.
SchreursMA (2010) Multi-level governance and global climate change in East Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review5(1): 88–105.
52.
SohEYYuenB (2006) Government-aided participation in planning Singapore. Cities23(1): 30–43.
53.
WalkerG (2009) Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode41(4): 614–636.
54.
WestmanLCastán BrotoV (2018) Climate governance through partnerships: A study of 150 urban initiatives in China. Global Environmental Change50: 212–221.
55.
WhileAJonasAEGGibbsD (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(1): 76–93.
