This paper argues for a situated politics of women’s agency in enduring intimate partner violence (IPV) in contexts of extreme urban violence. We contend that interrogating agency as dynamic and lived facilitates an acknowledgement of the multi-scalar entanglements of violence across urban spaces. Recognising the complexities in human agency holds the potential for a radical gendered urban politics to emerge whereby people are neither simplistically victims nor pawns of violent processes, but located within dynamic ‘webs of social relations’ (Cumbers A, Helms G and Swanson K (2010) Class, agency and resistance in the old industrial city. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 42(1): 54). Drawing on feminist theory, our conceptualisation of agency serves as a lens through which we can examine the dynamic and gendered nature of urban violence as rooted in multiple social relations (McNay L (2010) Feminism and post-identity politics: The problem of agency. Constellations 17(4): 512–525). The paper draws on research in the urban peripheries of Rio de Janiero and San Salvador.
AhearnLM (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology30: 109–137.
2.
AskinsK (2015) Being together: Everyday geographies and the quiet politics of belonging. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies14(2): 461–469.
3.
AuyeroJ (2011) Researching the urban margins: What can the United States learn from Latin America and vice versa. City and Community10(4): 431–436.
4.
AuyeroJBertiM (2015) In Harm’s Way. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
5.
BehlN (2016) Gendered discipline, gendered space: An ethnographic approach to gendered violence in India. Space and Polity21(1): 43–58.
6.
BilgeS (2010) Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies31(1): 9–28.
7.
BoestenJ (2012) The state and violence against women in Peru: Intersecting inequalities and patriarchal rule. Social Politics19(3): 361–382.
8.
BrickellK (2015) Towards intimate geographies of peace? Local reconciliation of domestic violence in Cambodia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40(3): 321–333.
9.
BrickellK (2017) Clouding the judgment of domestic violence law: Victim blaming by institutional stakeholders in Cambodia. Journal of Interpersonal Violence32(9): 1–21.
10.
BurdickJ (1998) Blessed Anastácia: Women, Race, and Popular Christianity in Brazil. New York: Routledge.
11.
CanoI (2012) ‘Os Donos do Morro’: Uma avaliação exploratória do impato das Unidades de Polícia Pacificadora (UPPs) no Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública.
12.
Careaga-PérezG (2016) Moral panic and gender ideology in Latin America. Religion and Gender6(2): 251–255.
13.
CareyDJrTorresG (2010) Precursors to femicide: Guatemalan women in a vortex of violence. Latin American Research Review45(3): 142–165.
14.
CavanaghK (2003) Understanding women’s responses to domestic violence. Qualitative Social Work2(3): 229–249.
15.
CornwallA (2013) Introductory overview – Buzzwords and fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse. In: CornwallAEadeD (eds) Deconstructing Development Discourse Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, in association with Oxfam GB, pp. 1–18.
16.
CumbersAHelmsGSwansonK (2010) Class, agency and resistance in the old industrial city. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography42(1): 46–73.
17.
DasV (2004) The signature of the state: The paradox of illegibility. In: DasVPooleD (eds) Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Oxford: James Currey, pp. 225–252.
18.
DattaA (2012) The Illegal City: Space, Law and Gender in a Delhi Squatter Settlement. Farnham: Ashgate.
19.
DattaA (2016) The intimate city: Violence, gender and ordinary life in Delhi slums. Urban Geography37(3): 323–342.
20.
De CamposCH (2015) Desafios na implementação da Lei Maria da Penha. Revista Direito GV11(2): 391–406.
21.
DobashREDobashR (1979) Violence Against Wives. New York: Free Press.
22.
ElsonDPearsonR (1981) ‘Nimble fingers make cheap workers’: An analysis of women’s employment in third world export manufacturing. Feminist Review7: 87–107.
23.
EnglandK (2005) Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer46(1): 241–256.
24.
Engle MerryS (2016) The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
FeatherstoneDGriffinP (2016) Spatial relations, histories from below and the makings of agency: Reflections on The Making of the English Working Class at 50. Progress in Human Geography40(3): 375–393.
26.
FleuryRSullivanCBybeeD (2000) When ending the relationship does not end the violence: Women’s experiences of violence by former partners. Violence Against Women6: 1363–1383.
27.
Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública (FBSP) (2017) Visível e invisível: A Victimização de Mulheres no Brasil. São Paulo: FBSP.
28.
FriedmanEJ (2009) Re(gion)alizing women’s human rights in Latin America. Politics and Gender5(3): 349–375.
29.
GarmanyJ (2010) Religion and governmentality: Understanding governance in urban Brazil. Geoforum41(6): 908–918.
30.
HankinsK (2017) Creative democracy and the quiet politics of the everyday. Urban Geography38(4): 502–506.
31.
HumeM (2004) ‘It’s as if you don’t know, because you don’t do anything about it’: Gender and violence in El Salvador. Environment and Urbanization16(2): 63–72.
32.
HumeM (2009a) The Politics of Violence: Gender, Conflict and Community. London: John Wiley.
33.
HumeM (2009b) Researching the gendered silences of violence in El Salvador. IDS Bulletin40(3): 78–85.
34.
HumeMKaneL (2016) ‘Ahora hasta nos dicen que somos malcriadas porque no nos quedamos calladas’: A study of the programme to prevent gender violence in El Salvador and Guatemala. Oxfam Research Report. San Salvador; Guatemala City; Boston, MA: Oxfam.
35.
KabeerN (2003) Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Poverty Eradication and the Millennium Development Goals: Handbook for Policy Makers. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
36.
KatzC (2004) Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
KellyL (1996) When does the speaking profit us? Reflections on the challenges of developing feminist perspectives on abuse and violence by women. In: HesterMKellyLRadfordJ (eds) Women, Violence and Male Power: Feminist Research, Activism and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 34–49.
38.
KellyL (2000) Wars against women: Metaphor or reality? Gendered violence and the militarised state. In: JacobsSJacobsonRMarchbankJ (eds) States of Conflict: Gender, Violence and Resistance. London: Zed Books, pp. 45–65.
39.
LorentzenLAMiraR (2005) El milagro está en casa: Gender and private/public empowerment in a migrant Pentecostal church. Latin American Perspectives32(1): 57–71.
40.
MacaulayF (2002) Taking the law into their own hands: Women, legal reform and legal literacy in Latin America. In: MolyneuxMCraskeN (eds) Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 79–101.
41.
McIlwaineC (2013) Urbanization and gender-based violence: Exploring the paradoxes in the Global South. Environment and Urbanization25(1): 65–79.
42.
MacKinnonDDriscoll DericksonK (2013) From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography37(2): 253–270.
43.
McNayL (2004) Agency and experience: Gender as a lived relation. In: AdkinsLSkeggsB (eds) Feminism after Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 175–190.
44.
McNayL (2010) Feminism and post-identity politics: The problem of agency. Constellations17(4): 512–525.
45.
McWilliamsMNí AoláinF (2013) ‘There is a war going on you know’: Addressing the complexity of violence against women in conflicted and post conflict societies. Transitional Justice Review1(2): 4–44.
46.
MahmoodS (2001) Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology16(2): 202–236.
47.
MenjívarC (2011) Enduring Violence: Ladina Women’s Lives in Guatemala. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48.
MolyneuxM (1998) Analysing women’s movements. Development and Change29(2): 219–245.
49.
MoserCONMcIlwaineC (2014) Editorial: New frontiers in twenty-first century urban conflict and violence. Environment and Urbanization26(2): 331–344.
50.
MuggahR (2012) Researching the Urban Dilemma: Urbanisation, Poverty and Violence. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
51.
MuñozL (2016) Agency, choice and restrictions in producing Latina/o street vending landscapes in Los Angeles. Area48(3): 339–345.
52.
NastH (1994) Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. Professional Geographer46(1): 54–66.
53.
NeumannP (2017) When laws are not enough: Violence against women and bureaucratic practice in Nicaragua. Social Forces95(3): 1105–1125.
54.
OrtnerSB (1995) Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History37(1): 173–193.
55.
PainR (2014) Everyday terrorism: Connecting domestic violence and global terrorism. Progress in Human Geography38(4): 531–550.
56.
Prieto-CarrónMThomsonMMacdonaldM (2007) No more killings! Women respond to feminicides in Central America. Gender and Development15(1): 25–40.
57.
Thapar-BjörkertSMorganKJ (2010) ‘But sometimes I think … they put themselves in the situation’: Exploring blame and responsibility in interpersonal violence. Violence Against Women16(1): 32–59.
58.
UNDP (2013) Regional Human Development Report on Latin America: Citizen Security with a Human Face: Evidence and Proposals for Latin America. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/citizen-security-human-face (accessed 11 June 2018).
59.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2013) Global Study on Homicide. Available at: www.unodc.org/gsh/ (accessed 11 June 2018).
60.
WalbySTowersJFrancisB (2014) Mainstreaming domestic and gender-based violence into sociology and the criminology of violence. The Sociological Review 62(S2): 187–214.
61.
WendtAE (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization41(3): 335–370.
62.
WestmarlandNKellyL (2013) Why extending measurements of ‘success’ in domestic violence perpetrator programmes matters for social work. British Journal of Social Work43(6): 1092–1110.
63.
WilcoxP (2006) Communities, care and domestic violence. Critical Social Policy26(4): 722–747.
64.
WildingP (2012) Negotiating Boundaries: Gender, Violence and Transformation in Brazil. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
WilliamsP (2015) Everyday Peace? Politics, Citizenship and Muslim Lives in India. RGS-IBG Book Series. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
YoungIM (2003) The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society29(1): 1–25.
68.
ZulverJ (2016) High risk feminism in El Salvador: Women’s mobilisation in violent times. Gender and Development24(2): 171–185.
