In an effort to improve diet and health outcomes, policymakers have increasingly turned to supply-side subsidies aimed at encouraging investment by supermarkets and other food retailers in low-income areas. This article examines whether the US federal government’s New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) has affected the entry of retail food establishments, and in turn food shopping and purchasing patterns, in low-income communities. To identify the impacts of the programme, we take advantage of a discontinuity in NMTC funding generated by the formula used to determine the eligibility of census tracts for investment under the programme. We find that the NMTC Program has had modest, but positive impacts on supermarket entry in low-income communities. Based on household-level scanner data, there are no detectable effects on households’ food purchasing patterns in affected neighbourhoods, at least in the short run.
AbravanelMPindusNTheodosBet al. (2013) New Markets Tax Credit Program Evaluation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center.
2.
BitlerMHaiderS (2011) An economic view of food deserts in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30(1): 153–176.
3.
CDC (2011) State initiatives for supporting healthier food retail: An overview of the national landscape. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Report CS226271.
4.
CumminsSFlintEMatthewsS (2014) New neighborhood grocery store increased awareness of food access but did not alter dietary habits or obesity. Health Affairs33(2): 283–291.
5.
CutlerDLleras-MuneyA (2010) Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. Journal of Health Economics29(1): 1–28.
6.
ElbelBMoranADixonBet al. (2015) Assessment of a government-subsidized supermarket in a high-need area on household food availability and children’s dietary intakes. Public Health Nutrition18(15): 2881–2890.
7.
Food Marketing Institute (1998) Urban Supermarkets. Washington, DC: Food Marketing Institute.
8.
FreedmanM (2012) Teaching new markets old tricks: The effects of subsidized investment in low-income neighborhoods. Journal of Public Economics96(11–12): 1000–1014.
9.
FreedmanM (2015) Place-based programs and the geographic dispersion of employment. Regional Science and Urban Economics53: 1–19.
10.
HandburyJRahkovskyISchnellM (2017) Is the focus on food deserts fruitless? Retail access and food purchases across the socioeconomic spectrum. University of Pennsylvania. Working Paper. https://www.dropbox.com/s/173tmk6hg4tuwia/HRS_currentpublic.pdf?dl=0 (accessed 1 October 2017).
11.
HargerKRossA (2016) Do capital tax incentives attract new businesses? Evidence across industries from the New Markets Tax Credit. Journal of Regional Science56(5): 733–753.
12.
HoskenDOlsonLSmithL (2016) Can entry or exit event studies inform horizontal merger analysis? Evidence from grocery retailing. Economic Inquiry54(1): 342–360.
TaylorRVillas-BoasS (2016) Food Store Choices of Poor Households: A Discrete Choice Analysis of the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey. American Journal of Agricultural Economics98(2): 513–532.
US GAO (2010) New Markets Tax Credit: The Credit Helps Fund a Variety of Projects in Low-Income Communities, But Could Be Simplified. GAO-10–334. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-334 (accessed 1 October 2017).
18.
Ver PloegMBrenemanVFarriganTet al. (2009) Access to affordable and nutritious food: Measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences. Report to Congress, Economic Research Service.
19.
VolpeROkrentALeibtagE (2013) The effect of supercenter-format stores on the healthfulness of consumers’ grocery purchases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics95(3): 568–589.
20.
WeatherspoonDOehmkeJDembeleAet al. (2013) Price and expenditure elasticities for fresh fruits in an urban food desert. Urban Studies50(1): 88–106.
21.
WrigleyNWarmDMargettsB (2003) Deprivation, diet, and food-retail access: Findings from the Leeds ‘food deserts’ study. Environment and Planning A35(1): 151–188.
