This research investigates the mechanism of urban village redevelopment in south China. Through a revised typology of place entrepreneurs based on the growth machine thesis and a case study of Liede village in central Guangzhou, it illustrates how land-based interests embedded in an imbalanced power relationship can (de-)activate urban village redevelopment. The study reveals that while urban villagers, as represented by the village collective, have entrenched interests in the redevelopment process, the city government – as monopolistic land manager and place entrepreneur – plays the deciding role in forging and halting a growth machine geared towards urban village redevelopment. Although developers are also part of the process, the (de-)activation of redevelopment growth machine/coalition in Guangzhou has largely been dominated by the city government. With a comparative view on the original growth machine model, it is hoped that this study would furnish both theoretical and practical thoughts for future research.
ChenZXuT (2011) Toward ‘competing for harmonious’: Transition of governance mode of central and local government under promotion tournament. The Journal of World Economy9: 3–18 [in Chinese].
2.
China Index Academy (CIA) (2012) CREIS data base (nonpublic data). Paid service. Available at: http://creis.fang.com/?cn (accessed 4 Setpember 2017).
3.
DingCR (2007) Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China. Land Use Policy24(1): 1–13.
4.
GolubchikovOPhelpsNA (2011) The political economy of place at the post-socialist urban periphery: Governing growth on the edge of Moscow. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36(3): 425–440.
5.
GothamKF (2001a) A city without slums: Urban renewal, public housing, and downtown revitalization in Kansas City, Missouri. American Journal of Economics and Sociology60(1): 285–316.
6.
GothamKF (2001b) Urban redevelopment, past and present. Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment6: 1–31.
7.
Guangzhou Tianhe District Urban Planning Bureau (GTDUPB) (2005) Redevelopment Plan of Liede Village in Tianhe District (Unpublished government document).
8.
Guangzhou Urban Planning Bureau (GUPB) (2004) A letter concerning the control requirements for the Redevelopment Plan of Liede Village in Tianhe District (Unpublished government document).
9.
Guangzhou Urban Planning Bureau (GUPB) (2007) Reply letter permitting the detailed regulatory plan for the resettlement residential land and the business hotel plot of Liede Village redevelopment project (Unpublished government document).
10.
Guangzhou Urban Renewal Bureau (GURB) (2012a) Redevelopment of Liede urban village (Unpublished Project publicity material).
11.
Guangzhou Urban Renewal Bureau (GURB) (2012b) Basic data sheet of urban villages in Guangzhou (Unpublished government document).
12.
HanSS (2010) Urban expansion in contemporary China: What can we learn from a small town?Land Use Policy27(3): 780–787.
13.
HaoPSliuzasRGeertmanS (2011) The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat International35(2): 214–224.
14.
HardingA (1995) Elite theory and growth machines. In: JudgeDStokerGWolmanH (eds) Theories of Urban Politics. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd, pp. 35–53.
15.
HardingA (1999) Review article: North urban political economy, urban theory and British research. British Journal of Political Science29(04): 673–698.
16.
HeSJWuFL (2005) Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs27(1): 1–23.
17.
HinLLXinL (2011) Redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen, China – An analysis of power relations and urban coalitions. Habitat International35(3): 426–434.
18.
HsingYT (2010) The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
JonasAEWilsonD (eds) (1999) The City as a Growth Machine: Critical Reflections Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
KanK (2016) The transformation of the village collective in urbanising China: A historical institutional analysis. Journal of Rural Studies47(Part B): 588–600.
21.
KnappAVojnovicI (2013) Rethinking the growth machine: How to erase a Chinatown from the urban core. Urban Geography34(1): 53–85.
22.
KulcsarLJDomokosT (2005) The post-socialist growth machine: The case of Hungary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29(3): 550–563.
23.
LaiYChanEHWChoyL (2017) Village-led land development under state-led institutional arrangements in urbanising China: The case of Shenzhen. Urban Studies54(7): 1736–1759
24.
LangWChenTLiX (2016) A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities. Habitat International55: 1–9.
25.
LiLHLinJLiXet al. (2014) Redevelopment of urban village in China – A step towards an effective urban policy? A case study of Liede village in Guangzhou. Habitat International43: 299–308.
26.
LiPL (2002) Tremendous changes: The end of villages – A study of villages in the center of Guangzhou city. Social Sciences in China1: 168–180 [in Chinese].
27.
LiXXuXX (2008) Land property right and behavioral incentives: The microscopic mechanism of the evolvement of urban villages. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning1: 55–69 [in Chinese].
28.
Liede Village Committee, (2005b) Chronicles of Liede Village. Guangzhou: Guangdong Provincial Land Reclamation Bureau Press [in Chinese].
29.
Liede Village Committee (2005a) Some opinions on the Redevelopment Plan of Liede Village in Tianhe District (Unpublished document).
30.
LightI (2002) Immigrant place entrepreneurs in Los Angeles, 1970–99. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26(2): 215–228.
31.
LinGCS (2007) Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanisation: New city-based and land-centred urban transformation. Urban Studies44(9): 1827–1855.
32.
LinGCS (2009) Scaling-up regional development in globalizing China: Local capital accumulation, land-centered politics, and reproduction of space. Regional Studies43(3): 429–447.
33.
LinGCS (2015) The redevelopment of China’s construction land: Practising land property rights in cities through renewals. The China Quarterly224: 865–887.
34.
LinGCSHoSP (2005) The state, land system, and land development processes in contemporary China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95(2): 411–436.
35.
LinSS (2013) Records of Guangzhou city development. Guangzhou: Guangdong Province Press & Guangdong People Press [in Chinese].
36.
LinYLMeulderBD (2012) A conceptual framework for the strategic urban project approach for the sustainable redevelopment of ‘villages in the city’ in Guangzhou. Habitat International36(3): 380–387.
37.
LinYLHaoPGeertmanS (2015) A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’. Urban Studies52(10): 1774–1790.
38.
LiuHY (2013) Liede chongpang zai tian wuxingji jiudian [A new five-star hotel to be built near Liedechong], 7January. Available at: http://epaper.southcn.com/nfdaily/html.
39.
LiuRWongTCLiuS (2012a) Peasants’ counterplots against the state monopoly of the rural urbanization process: Urban villages and ‘small property housing’ in Beijing, China. Environment and Planning A44(5): 1219–1240.
40.
LiuYLiuYQLiZG (2012b) Citizenization of native villagers after redeveloped urban village: A case study of Liede community, Guangzhou. City Planning Review7: 018 [in Chinese].
41.
LoganJRMolotchHL (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
42.
LoganJRWhaleyRBCrowderK (1997) The character and consequences of growth regimes an assessment of 20 years of research. Urban Affairs Review32(5): 603–630.
43.
MolotchHL (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82(2): 309–332.
44.
MolotchH (1979) Capital and Neighborhood in the United States some conceptual links. Urban Affairs Review14(3): 289–312.
45.
MolotchHLVicariS (1988) Three ways to build the development process in the United States, Japan, and Italy. Urban Affairs Review24(2): 188–214.
46.
PhelpsNA (2012) The growth machine stops? Urban politics and the making and remaking of an edge city. Urban Affairs Review48(5): 670–700.
47.
RodgersS (2009) Urban growth machine. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) The International Encylopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 40–45.
48.
ShinHB (2009) Residential redevelopment and the entrepreneurial local state: The implications of Beijing’s shifting emphasis on urban redevelopment policies. Urban Studies46(13): 2815–2839.
49.
SongJ (2015) Official relocation and self-help development: Three housing strategies under ambiguous property rights in China’s rural land development. Urban Studies52(1): 121–137.
50.
SunYLinJChanRCK (2017) Pseudo use value and output legitimacy of local growth coalitions in China: A case study of the Liede redevelopment project in Guangzhou[J]. Cities61: 9–16.
51.
TianL (2008) The chengzhongcun land market in China: Boon or bane? – A perspective on property rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(2): 282–304.
52.
VicariSMolotchHL (1990) Building Milan: Alternative machines of growth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14(4): 602–624.
53.
WangYPWangYWuJ (2009) Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 957–973.
54.
WardKG (2000) Front rentiers to rantiers: ‘Active entrepreneurs’, ‘structural speculators’ and the politics of marketing the city. Urban Studies37(7): 1093–1107.
55.
WoodA (1999) Organizing for local economic development: The growth coalition as a cross-national comparative framework. In: JonasAEWilsonD (eds) The City as a Growth Machine: Critical Reflections Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 163–176.
56.
WuFL (2002) China’s changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy. Urban Studies39(7): 1071–1093.
57.
WuFL (2015) Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China. New York: Routledge.
58.
WuFL (2016) State dominance in urban redevelopment beyond gentrification in urban China. Urban Affairs Review52(5): 631–658.
59.
WuFLZhangFZWebsterC (2013) Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area. Urban Studies50(10): 1919–1934.
60.
WuQZhangXXuYet al. (2016) Dualities of semi-urbanization villages in social-spatial transition: A case study of Zhoucun village in suburban Nanjing, China. Journal of Rural Studies47(Part B): 657–664.
61.
YanXPengYZengYH (2004) Chengzhongcun gaizao jujue dichanshang, yi jiti he geren chuzi weizhu [No developers in urban village redevelopment, the village collective and villagers should invest instead], 8September. Available at: http://news.southcn.com.
62.
YangYRChangC (2007) An urban regeneration regime in China: A case study of urban redevelopment in Shanghai’s Taipingqiao area. Urban Studies44(9): 1809–1826.
63.
ZhangJXWuFL (2008) Mega-event marketing and urban growth coalitions: A case study of Nanjing Olympic New Town. Town Planning Review79(2–3): 209–226.
64.
ZhangL (2011) The political economy of informal settlements in post-socialist China: The case of chengzhongcun(s). Geoforum42(4): 473–483.
65.
ZhangS (2014) Land-centered urban politics in transitional China – Can they be explained by Growth Machine Theory?Cities41: 179–186.
66.
ZhangTW (2002) Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review37(4): 475–499.
67.
ZhangYFangK (2004) Is history repeating itself? From urban renewal in the United States to inner-city redevelopment in China. Journal of Planning Education and Research23(3): 286–298.
68.
ZhaoYJWebsterC (2011) Land dispossession and enrichment in China’s suburban villages. Urban Studies48(3): 529–551.
69.
ZhuJM (1999) Local growth coalition: The context and implications of China’s gradualist urban land reforms. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23(3): 534–548.
