Using a spatial econometric model this article studies the determinants and spatial spillovers of firm productivity in China’s electric apparatus industry over the period of 1999–2007. We apply Kelejian’s FE-2SLS procedure to a higher-order spatial autoregressive model and estimate the spatial dependence of firm-level TFP within and across regional borders. The model demonstrates positive and significant intra-regional technological spillovers among firms. It also provides direct evidence that technological spillovers attenuate rapidly in spatial distance. We find that firm productivity benefits from own R&D and export activities, employment density, market competition and public expenditure. Further analyses show that the strength of spillover effects is affected by a broad range of factors, including the surface area of the region, administration type, border effect, transport and ICT infrastructure, FDI intensity, the financial sector, the utility service sector, and human capital. Factors that facilitate long-distance economic connections in general make inter-regional spillovers stronger but intra-regional spillovers weaker.
AitkenBJHarrisonAE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review89: 605–618.
2.
ArzaghiMHendersonJV (2008) Networking off Madison Avenue. The Review of Economic Studies75: 1011–1038.
3.
AschauerDA (1989) Is public expenditure productive?Journal of Monetary Economics23: 177–200.
4.
AudretschDBFeldmanMP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review86: 630–640.
5.
BaiC-ETaoZTongYS (2008) Bureaucratic integration and regional specialization in China. China Economic Review19: 308–319.
6.
BaltagiBHEggerPHKesinaM (2015) Sources of productivity spillovers: Panel data evidence from China. Journal of Productivity Analysis43: 389–402.
7.
BaoQHuangJWangY (2015) Productivity and firms’ sales destination: Chinese characteristics. Review of International Economics23(3): 620–637.
8.
BehrensKDurantonGRobert-NicoudF (2014) Productive cities: Sorting, selection, and agglomeration. Journal of Political Economy122: 507–553.
9.
BoeingPMuellerESandnerPG (2016) China’s R&D explosion – Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time. Research Policy45: 159–176.
10.
BrandtLVan BiesebroeckJZhangY (2012) Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics97: 339–351.
11.
CicconeAHallRE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review86: 54–70.
12.
CleridesSKLachSTyboutJR (1998) Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics113: 903–947.
13.
CombesP-PGobillonL (2015) The empirics of agglomeration economies. In: DurantonGHendersonJVStrangeWC (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 247–348.
14.
CombesP-PDurantonGGobillonL. (2012) The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica80: 2543–2594.
15.
CombesP-PMagnacTRobinJ-M (2004) The dynamics of local employment in France. Journal of Urban Economics56: 217–243.
16.
DemurgerS (2001) Infrastructure development and economic growth: An explanation for regional disparities in China?Journal of Comparative Economics29: 95–117.
17.
DurantonGPugaD (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: HendersonJVThisseJ-F (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2063–2117.
18.
ElhorstJP (2014) Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg: Springer.
19.
EllisonGGlaeserELKerrWR (2010) What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. The American Economic Review100: 1195–1213.
20.
GarateSPennington-CrossA (2014) Measuring the impact of agglomeration on productivity: Evidence from Chilean retailers. Urban Studies51: 1653–1671.
21.
GlaeserELKallalHDScheinkmanJA (1992) Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy100(6): 1126–1152.
22.
GriffithRReddingSVan ReenenJ (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics86: 883–895.
23.
HallBHMairesseJMohnenP (2010) Measuring the Returns to R&D. Volume 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1033–1082.
24.
HeadKMayerT (2000) Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU. Review of World Economics136(2): 284–314.
25.
HelsleyRWStrangeWC (1990) Matching and agglomeration economies in a system of cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics20: 189–212.
26.
HendersonJV (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics53: 1–28.
27.
HolmesTJ (1999) Localization of industry and vertical disintegration. Review of Economics and Statistics81: 314–325.
28.
HsiehC-TSongZM (2015) Grasp the large, let go of the small: The transformation of the state sector in China. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2015: 295–366.
29.
HuCXuZYashiroN (2015) Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence. China Economic Review33: 50–66.
30.
HuAGJeffersonGH (2004) Returns to research and development in Chinese industry: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in Beijing. China Economic Review15: 86–107.
31.
HuAGJeffersonGHJinchangQ (2005) R&D and technology transfer: Firm-level evidence from Chinese industry. Review of Economics and Statistics87: 780–786.
32.
KelejianHHPruchaIR (1998) A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure of estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics17: 99–121.
33.
KelejianHHPruchaIRYuzefovichY (2004) Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances: Large and small sample results. In: LesageJPPaceRK (eds) Advances in Econometrics, Volume 18. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 163–198.
34.
KellerWYeapleSR (2009) Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: Firm-level evidence from the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics91: 821–831.
35.
KeSHeMYuanC (2014) Synergy and co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing: A panel data analysis of Chinese cities. Regional Studies48: 1829–1841.
36.
KrugmanP (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy99: 483–499.
LevinsohnJPetrinA (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies70(2): 317–341.
39.
LuD (2010) Exceptional exporter performance? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Working paper, University of Chicago.
40.
LuJLuYTaoZ (2010) Exporting behavior of foreign affiliates: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics81: 197–205.
41.
MarshallA (1890) Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
42.
MartinPMayerTMaynerisF (2011) Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics2: 182–195.
43.
MorettiE (2004) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from plant-level production functions. The American Economic Review94: 656–690.
44.
MutlJPfaffermayrM (2011) The Hausman test in a Cliff and Ord panel model. The Econometrics Journal14: 48–76.
45.
PoncetS (2005) A fragmented China: Measure and determinants of Chinese domestic market disintegration. Review of International Economics13: 409–430.
46.
PorterME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review68: 73–93.
47.
RosenthalSSStrangeWC (2001) The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics50: 191–229.
48.
RosenthalSSStrangeWC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics85: 377–393.
49.
RosenthalSSStrangeWC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics4: 2119–2171.
50.
RosenthalSSStrangeWC (2008) The attenuation of human capital spillovers. Journal of Urban Economics64: 373–389.
51.
ShengYSongL (2013) Re-estimation of firms’ total factor productivity in China’s iron and steel industry. China Economic Review24(3): 177–188
52.
SmarzynskaJavorcik B (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. The American Economic Review94: 605–627.
53.
SyversonC (2011) What determines productivity?Journal of Economics Literature49: 326–365.
54.
TanakaKHashiguchiY (2012) Spatial spillovers from FDI agglomeration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta in China. Working Paper 354, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO.
55.
VijverbergWPFuF-CVijverbergC-PC (2011) Public infrastructure as a determinant of productive performance in China. Journal of Productivity Analysis36: 91–111.
56.
WeiYLiuX (2006) Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of International Business Studies37: 544–557.
57.
XuXShengY (2012) Are FDI spillovers regional? Firm-level evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics23: 244–258.
58.
YilmazSHaynesKEDincM (2002) Geographic and network neighbors: Spillover effects of telecommunications infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science42: 339–360.
59.
YuNDe JongMStormS. (2013) Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure: Evidence from Chinese regions. Journal of Transport Geography28: 56–66.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
