Studies on China’s new housing regime primarily focus on state and market as major provision mechanisms and the role of family assistance is largely ignored. This paper explores how family resources help Chinese young professionals in their pathways to homeownership by drawing on qualitative interviews done in Beijing. It was found that young professionals who managed to secure parental help usually came from middle-class families, with parents who were public-sector professionals and managers benefiting from the state’s generous housing reforms in the 1990s. As a result of these intergenerational transfers, housing advantages of these middle-class parents were reproduced among their younger generation, making it easier for them to become homeowners. They might also exacerbate the pre-existing housing inequality. These transfers were made possible in the unique family context with frequent reciprocal exchanges of help and care, which was strengthened by the country’s one-child policy. The new housing regime, characterised by the neoliberal shift of the state’s role and the house price inflation, also enhanced the necessity of relying on family resources.
BianYJLiuY (2005) Social stratification, homeownership and quality of living: Evidence from China’s fifth census. Sociological Research2005(3): 82–98 [in Chinese].
2.
BianYJLoganJ (1996) Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review61(5): 739–758.
3.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode34(3): 349–379.
4.
BreslinS (2006) Serving the market or serving the party: Neoliberalism in China. In: RobinsonR (ed.) The Neoliberal Revolution: Forging the Market State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 114–131.
5.
ChenL (2015) How China attempted to guide a new and unwidely housing market. China: An International Journal13(3): 114–128.
6.
CrollE (2006) The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies34(4): 473–791.
7.
DavisD (1993) Urban households: Supplicants to a socialist state. In: DavisDHarrelS (eds) Chinese Families in Post-Mao Era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 50–76.
8.
DavisD (2000) Reconfiguring Shanghai households. In: EntwisleSHendersonG (eds) Re-drawing Boundaries: Work, Households and Gender in China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 145–160.
9.
DavisD (2003) From welfare benefit to capitalized asset: The re-commodification of residential space in urban China. In: ForrestRLeeJ (eds) Housing and Social Change. London: Routledge, pp. 183–198.
10.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJ (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
FongV (2004) Only Hope: Coming of Age under China’s One-Child Policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
ForrestR (2011) Residence through revolution and reform. In: BridgeGWatsonS (eds) The New Blackwell Companion to the City. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 142–153.
13.
ForrestR (2013) Making sense of the housing trajectories of young people. In: ForrestRYipNM (eds) Young People and Housing. London: Routledge, pp. 1–15.
14.
ForrestRHirayamaY (2009) The uneven impact of neoliberalism on housing opportunities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 998–1013.
15.
ForrestRIzuharaM (2009) Exploring the demographic location of housing wealth in East Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy2(2): 209–221.
16.
ForrestRIzuharaM (2012) The shaping of housing histories in Shanghai. Housing Studies27(1): 27–44.
17.
ForrestRMurieA (1995a) Housing and family wealth in comparative perspective. In: ForrestRMurieA (eds) Housing and Family Wealth. London: Routledge, pp. 1–7.
18.
ForrestRMurieA (1995b) Accumulating evidence: Housing and family wealth in Britain. In: ForrestRMurieA (eds) Housing and Family Wealth. London: Routledge, pp. 58–85.
19.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HeldermanAMulderC (2007) Intergenerational transmission of homeownership: The roles of gifts and continuities in housing market characteristics. Urban Studies44(2): 231–247.
22.
HenrettaJ (1984) Parental status and child’s home ownership. American Sociological Review19(1): 131–140.
23.
HuangYQJiangLW (2009) Housing inequality in transitional Beijing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 936–956.
24.
HuangYQLiSM (2014) Housing inequality, residential differential and social stratification. In: HuangYQLiSM (eds) Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities. London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.
25.
HuangYQYiCD (2011) Second home ownership in transitional urban China. Housing Studies26(3): 423–447.
26.
IkelsC (1993) Settling accounts: The intergenerational contract in an age of reform. In: DavisDHarrellS (eds) Chinese Families in the Post-Mao Era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 307–333.
27.
IkelsC (2004) The impact of housing policy on China’s urban elderly. Urban Anthropology33(2–4): 321–355.
28.
KurzKBlossfeldHP (2004) Introduction: Social stratification, welfare regimes and access to homeownership. In: KurzKBlossfeldHP (eds) Homeownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–20.
29.
LeeJZhuYP (2006) Urban governance, neoliberalism and housing reform in China. The Pacific Review19(1): 39–61.
30.
LeeYSF (1988) The urban housing problem in China. The China Quarterly115: 387–407.
31.
LiBQShinHB (2013) Intergenerational housing support between retired old parents and their children in urban China. Urban Studies50(16): 3325–3342.
LiJNiuXH (2003) The new middle class(es) in Peking: A case study. China Perspectives45: 4–20.
34.
LiLL (2003) The Continuing of Reproducing: Institutional Change and Urban Social Stratification. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press [in Chinese].
35.
LiSM (2010) Mortgage loan as a means of home finance in urban China: A comparative study of Guangzhou and Shanghai. Housing Studies25(6): 857–876.
36.
LiSMYiZ (2007a) The road to homeownership under market transition: Beijing 1980–2001. Urban Affairs Review42(3): 342–368.
37.
LiSMYiZ (2007b) Financing home purchase in China, with special reference to Guangzhou. Housing Studies22(3): 409–425.
38.
LiewLH (2005) China’s engagement with neoliberalism: Path dependency, geography and party self-reinvention. The Journal of Development Studies41(2): 331–352.
39.
LiuZYHuR (2010) Urban housing stratification: An analysis based on CGS2006 data. Society2010(5): 164–192.
40.
LoganJBianFQ (1999) Family values and coresidence with married children in urban China. Social Forces77(4): 1253–1283.
41.
LoganJFangYPZhangZX (2009) Access to housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 914–935.
42.
LoganJFangYPZhangZX (2010) The winners in China’s urban housing reform. Housing Studies25(1): 101–117.
43.
LuXY. (2004) Social Mobility in Contemporary China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press [in Chinese].
44.
MulderCSmitsJ (1999) First-time home-ownership of couples: The effect of intergenerational transmission. European Sociological Review15(3): 323–337.
45.
NeeV (1989) A theory of market transition: From distribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review54(5): 663–681.
46.
NieC (2016) China’s housing policy. In: NgokKLChanCK (eds) China’s Social Policy: Transformation and Challenges. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 103–124.
47.
OngAZhangL (2008) Introduction: Privatizing China. In: OngAZhangL (eds) Privatizing China: Socialism from Afar. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–19.
48.
PickvanceCGPickvanceK (1995) The role of family help in the housing decision of young people. The Sociological Review43(1): 123–149.
49.
PolanyiK (1944) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
50.
PolanyiK (1957) The economy as instituted process. In: PolanyiKArensbergCPearsonH (eds) Trade and Market in the Early Empires. New York: Free Press, pp. 243–270.
51.
SavageMBagnallGLonghurstB (2005) Globalization and Belonging. London: Sage.
52.
SoAYChuYW (2016) The Global Rise of China. Cambridge: Polity.
53.
TombaL (2004) Creating an urban middle class: Social engineering in Beijing. The China Journal51: 1–26.
54.
UngerJ (1993) Urban families in the eighties. In: DavisDHarrelS (eds) Chinese Families in Post-Mao Era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 25–49.
55.
WangYPMurieA (2000) Social and spatial implications of housing reform in China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2): 397–417.
56.
WangYPLeiSMurieA. (2012) The maturation of the neo-liberal housing market in urban China. Housing Studies27(3): 343–359.
57.
WhyteMK (2003) China’s revolutions and intergenerational relations. In: WhyteMK (ed.) China’s Revolutions and Intergenerational Relations. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Chinese Studies, the University of Michigan, pp. 3–30.
58.
WhyteMKParishW (1984) Urban Life in Contemporary China. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
59.
WrightEO (1997) Class Counts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
WuFL (2008) China’s great transformation: Neoliberalization as establishing a market society. Geoforum39(3): 1093–1096.
61.
WuFL (2010) How neoliberal Is China’s reform? The origins of change during transition. Eurasian Geography and Economics51(5): 619–631.
62.
WuJGyourkoJDengYH (2016) Evaluating the risk of Chinese housing markets. China Economic Review39: 91–114.
63.
ZhengHS. (2004) Social Structure of the Cities in Contemporary China. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press [in Chinese].
64.
ZhouXGMoenPTumaN (1998) Educational stratification in urban China 1949–94. Sociology of Education71(3): 199–222.
65.
ZhuD (2012) A study on the homeownership of post-80 youth: Evidence from the 985 tertiary institutions. Jiangsu Social Sciences2012(3): 63–68 [in Chinese].
