This article offers an explanation for the wide spatial variations in choice of insolvency route by personal debtors across local authorities in England and Wales. It is argued that formal bankruptcy has a more negative impact on social capital through stigma effects than the alternative of Individual Voluntary Arrangements. Consequently, spatial variations in choices are related to variations in social capital. The hypotheses derived from this approach are tested through the use of spatial econometric models utilising data from England and Wales. The results provide support for a positive link between variables related to social capital (age, mobility and home ownership) and choice of IVAs. It is argued that avoidance of stigma costs provides an explanation for the apparent paradox of the significant growth of IVAs despite their high cost to debtors compared to bankruptcy. Whilst there is only limited support for impacts directly related to the urban-rural environment, significant spatial interdependencies in choices across neighbouring areas are also uncovered.
AgwaralSChomsisengphetSLiuC (2011) Consumer bankruptcy and default: The role of individual social capital. Journal of Economic Psychology32(4): 632–650.
2.
AkçomakIter WeelB (2012) The impact of social capital on crime: Evidence from the Netherlands. Regional Science and Urban Economics42(1–2): 323–340.
3.
BishopP (2013) The spatial distribution of personal insolvencies in England and Wales 2000–2007. Regional Studies47(3): 419–432.
4.
BishopPGripaiosP (2010) Personal insolvency in England and Wales: A spatial analysis. Urban Studies47(8): 1687–1702.
5.
BosAPryorJReederGet al. (2013) Stigma: Advances in theory and research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology35(1): 1–9.
6.
BuckleyFBrinigM (1998) The bankruptcy puzzle. Journal of Legal Studies27(1): 187–207.
7.
Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (2013) The Insolvency Service. Report for House of Commons, The Stationery Office, London, UK.
DebertinDLGoetzJS (2013) Social capital formation in rural, urban and suburban communities. Staff Paper 474, October, University of Kentucky, USA.
10.
Di MartinoP (2005) Approaching disaster: A comparison between personal bankruptcy legislation in Italy and England (c. 1880–1939). Business History47(1): 23–43.
11.
EfratR (2006a) The evolution of bankruptcy stigma. Theoretical Inquiries in Law7(2): 365–393.
12.
ElhorstP (2014) Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
13.
GathergoodJ (2005) The Social Dimension to the Consumer Bankruptcy Decision. Working Paper 10/05, CFCM Centre for Finance and Credit Markets, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Available at: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cfcm/documents/papers/10–05.pdf (accessed 10 July 2015).
14.
GlaeserELaibsonDSacerdoteB (2002) An economic approach to social capital. The Economic Journal112(483): 437–458.
15.
HansenBHansenM (2008) Religion, social capital, and business bankruptcy in the United States, 1921–1932. Business History50(6): 714–727.
16.
The Insolvency Service (2007) Enterprise Act 2002 – The Personal Insolvency Provisions: Final Evaluation. Report, November, London, UK.
17.
The Insolvency Service (2008) Survey of Debtors and Supervisors of Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs). Report, London, UK.
18.
The Insolvency Service (2009) Enterprise Act 2002: Attitudes to Bankruptcy 2009 Update. Report, London, UK.
19.
KelejianHPruchaI (2010) Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. Journal of Econometrics157(1): 53–67.
20.
LannooSVerhaegheP-PVandeputteBet al. (2011) Differences in social capital between urban and rural environments. Journal of Urban Affairs34(4): 373–394.
21.
McIntyreFSullivanDSummersL (2010) Lawyers Steer Clients Toward Lucrative Filings: Evidence from Consumer Bankruptcies. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, USA.
22.
MarotoM (2012) The scarring effects of bankruptcy: Cumulative disadvantage across credit and labor markets. Social Forces91(1): 99–130.
23.
MolsY (2012) Bankruptcy stigma and vulnerability: Questioning autonomy and structuring resilience. Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal29(1): 289–331.
24.
MuirJ (2011) Bridging and linking in a divided society: A social capital case study from Northern Ireland. Urban Studies48(5): 959–976.
25.
PondK (2002) Creditor strategy in individual insolvency. Managerial Finance28(6): 46–60.
26.
RoskrugeMGrimesAMcCannPet al. (2013) Homeownership, social capital and satisfaction with local government. Urban Studies50(12): 2517–2534.
27.
RuttenRBoekemaF (2007) Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technology, Forecasting and Social Change74: 1834–1846.
VermeulenFTillieJvan de WalleR (2012) Different effects of ethnic diversity on social capital: Density of foundations and leisure associations in Amsterdam neighbourhoods. Urban Studies49(2): 337–352.
30.
WaltersA (2009) Individual Voluntary Arrangements: A ‘fresh start’ for salaried consumer debtors in England and Wales?International Insolvency Review18(1): 5–36.
31.
WhiteM (2005) Economic Analysis of Corporate and Personal Bankruptcy Law. Working Paper 11536, August, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
