Social scientists have long shown great interest in the spatial correlates of crime patterns. A subset of the literature has focused on how micro-level spatial factors influence the formation of crime hot spots. At the same time, tangential research has highlighted how neighbourhood disadvantage influences crime occurrence. The current study focuses on the intersection of these perspectives through a spatial analysis of Motor Vehicle Theft (MVT) and Motor Vehicle Recovery (MVR) in Colorado Springs, CO. We begin by conducting a Risk Terrain Modelling analysis to identify spatial risk factors significantly related to MVT and MVR occurrence. We then test whether the spatial influences of the criminogenic risk factors differ across traditional measures of neighbourhood disadvantage. Findings suggest that while a citywide effect is evident for multiple risk factors, their spatial influence on crime significantly varies across neighbourhood contexts.
AndresenM (2014) Environmental Criminology. Evolution, Theory, and Practice. London: Routledge.
2.
AshbyMBowersK (2015) Concentrations of railway metal theft and the locations of scrap-metal dealers. Applied Geography63: 283–291.
3.
BastaLRichmondTWiebeD (2010) Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments. Social Science & Medicine71(11): 1943–1950.
4.
BergMStewartEBrunsonRet al. (2012) Neighborhood cultural heterogeneity and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28(3): 411–435.
5.
BernascoWBlockR (2011) Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(1): 33–57.
6.
BoessenAHippJ (2015) Close-ups and the scale of ecology: Land uses and the geography of social context and crime. Criminology53(3): 399–426.
7.
BragaABondB (2008) Policing crime and disorder hot spots. A randomized controlled trial. Criminology46(3): 577–607.
8.
BragaAClarkeR (2014) Explaining high-risk concentrations of crime in the city: Social disorganization, crime opportunities, and important next steps. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(4): 480–498.
9.
BragaAHureauDPapa ChristosA (2012) An ex post facto evaluation framework for place-based police interventions. Evaluation Review35(6): 592–626.
10.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ (1993) Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In: ClarkeRVFelsonM (eds) Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers, Volume 5, pp. 259–294.
11.
BruceMRoscignoVMcCallP (1998) Structure, context, and agency in the reproduction of black-on-black violence. Theoretical Criminology2(1): 29–55.
12.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) (2011) Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
13.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) (2015) Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2014. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
14.
CaplanJ (2011). Mapping the spatial influence of crime correlates: A comparison of operationalization schemes and implications for crime analysis and criminal justice practice. City-scape13(3): 57–83.
15.
CaplanJKennedyL (2013). Risk Terrain Modeling Diagnostics Utility (Version 1.0). Newark, NJ: Rutgers Center on Public Security. Available at: http://rutgerscps.weebly.com/software.html.
16.
CaplanJKennedyLBarnumJet al. (2015) Risk terrain modeling for spatial risk assessment. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research17(1): 7–16.
17.
CaplanJKennedyLMillerJ (2011) Risk terrain modeling: Brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Quarterly28(2): 360–381.
18.
CaplanJKennedyLPizaE (2013) Joint utility of event dependent and contextual crime analysis techniques for violent crime forecasting. Crime and Delinquency59(2): 243–270.
19.
ChaineyS (2008) Identifying priority neighborhoods using the vulnerable localities index. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice2(2): 196–209.
20.
ClarkeR (2002) Thefts Of and From Cars in Parking Facilities. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Guide No. 10. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
21.
ClarkeRCornishD (1985) Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In: TonryMNorrisM (eds) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 6. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 147–186.
22.
ClarkeREckJ (2005) Crime Analysis for Problem Solvers in 60 Small Steps. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
23.
ClarkeRHarrisP (1992) Auto theft and its prevention. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, Volume 16, pp. 1–54.
24.
CohenLFelsonM (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–605.
25.
CopesH (1999) Routine activities and motor vehicle theft: A crime specific approach. Journal of Crime and Justice22(2): 125–146.
26.
CornishD (1994) The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. In: ClarkeR (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, Volume 3, pp. 151–196.
27.
CornishDClarkeR (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
28.
DrawveG (2016) A metric comparison of predictive hot spot techniques and RTM. Justice Quarterly33(3): 369–397.
29.
DrawveGThomasSWalkerJ (2016) Bringing the physical environment back into neighborhood research: The utility of RTM for developing an aggregate neighborhood risk of crime measure. Journal of Criminal Justice44(1): 21–29.
30.
EckJ (1994) Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. Doctoral Dissertation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
31.
EckJClarkeRGueretteR (2007) Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. In: FarrelGBowersKJohnsonSetal. (eds) Imagination for Crime Prevention. Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. Crime Prevention Studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 21, pp. 225–264.
32.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (2015) Crime in the United States 2014. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
33.
FelsonM (1995) Those who discourage crime. Crime and Place4: 53–66.
34.
FelsonM (2002) Crime and Everyday Life. 3rd Edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
35.
GriffithsEChavezJ (2004) Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995. Merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology42(4): 941–978.
36.
GroffELa VigneN (2001) Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38(3): 257–278.
37.
GroffELockwoodB (2014) Criminogenic facilities and crime across street segments in Philadelphia: Uncovering evidence about the spatial extent of facility influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(3): 277–314.
38.
GroffEMcCordE (2011) The role of neighborhood parks as crime generators. Security Journal25(1): 1–24.
39.
GrubesicTMackEKaylenM (2012) Comparative modeling approaches for understanding urban violence. Social Science Research41(1): 92–109.
40.
HamiltonL (2013) Statistics with STATA. Updated for Version 12. Boston, MA: Cengage Brooks/Cole.
41.
HeffnerJ (2013) Statistics of the RTMDx utility. In: CaplanJKennedyLPizaE (eds) Risk Terrain Modeling Diagnostics (RTMDx) Utility User Manual (Version 1). Newark, NJ: Rutgers Center on Public Security, pp. 26–34.
42.
ImmergluckDSmithG (2006) The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Housing Studies21(6): 851–866.
43.
JacobsBCherbonneauM (2014) Auto theft and restrictive deterrence. Justice Quarterly31(2): 344–367.
44.
KatzCWallaceDHedbergE (2013) A longitudinal assessment of the impact of foreclosure on neighborhood crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50(3): 359–389.
45.
KennedyLCaplanJPizaE (2011) Risk clusters, hotspots, and spatial intelligence: Risk terrain modeling as an algorithm for police resource allocation strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology27(3): 339–362.
46.
KennedyLCaplanJPizaEet al. (2015) Vulnerability and exposure to crime: Applying risk terrain modeling to the study of assault in Chicago. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. Epub ahead of print 27 August 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s12061–015–9165-z.
47.
KubrinCHertingJ (2003) Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: An analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociological Quarterly44(3): 329–350.
48.
LaGrangeT (1999) The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency36(4): 393–422.
49.
LevyMTartaroC (2010) Auto theft: A site-survey and analysis of environmental crime factors in Atlantic City, NJ. Security Journal23(2): 75–94.
50.
LillyJCullenFBallR (2011) Criminological Theory. Context and Consequences. 5th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
51.
LockwoodB (2012) The presence and nature of a near-repeat pattern of motor vehicle theft. Security Journal25(1): 38–56.
52.
LuY (2006) Spatial choice of auto thefts in an urban environment. Security Journal19(3): 143–166.
53.
MaguireEUchidaCHassellK (2015) Problem-oriented policing in Colorado Springs: A content analysis of 753 cases. Crime & Delinquency61(1): 71–95.
MorenoffJSampsonRRaudenbushS (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology39(3): 517–559.
56.
MoretoWPizaECaplanJ (2014) A plague on both your houses? Risks, repeats, and reconsiderations of urban residential burglary. Justice Quarterly31(6): 1102–1126.
57.
MyersP (2002) The management of identity in bodegas: Stigma and microeconomics in Brooklyn. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse1(3): 75–92.
58.
OsgoodDChambersJ (2000) Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology38(1): 81–115.
59.
PizaESytsmaV (2016) Exploring the defensive actions of drug sellers in open-air markets: A systematic social observation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency53(1): 36–65.
60.
PoynerB (2006) Crime-free Housing in the 21st Century. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College of London. London: Brook House Publishing.
61.
PrattTCullenF (2005) Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice32: 373–450.
62.
RatcliffeJ (2012) The spatial extent of criminogenic places. A changepoint regression of violence around bars. Geographical Analysis44(4): 302–320.
63.
RiceKSmithW (2002) Socioecological models of automotive thefts: Integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency39(3): 304–336.
64.
RobertsA (2012) Motor vehicle recovery: A multilevel event history analysis of NIBRS data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency49(3): 444–467.
65.
RobertsABlockS (2012) Explaining temporary and permanent motor vehicle theft rates in the United States. A crime-specific approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50(3): 445–471.
66.
RoncekD (2000) Schools and crime. In: GoldsmithVMcGuirePMollenkopfJet al. (eds) Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 153–165.
67.
SampsonR (1983). Structural density and criminal victimization. Criminology21(2): 276–293.
68.
SampsonRGrovesW (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94(4): 774–802.
69.
SampsonRRaudenbushSEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328): 918–924.
70.
ShawCMcKayH (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71.
SkoganW (2015) Disorder and decline: The state of research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency52(4): 464–485.
72.
SnowdenAPridemoreW (2013) Alcohol and violence in a nonmetropolitan college town: Alcohol outlet density, outlet type and assault. Journal of Drug Issues43(3): 357–373.
73.
St JeanP (2007) Pockets of Crime: Broken Windows, Collective Efficacy, and the Criminal Point of View. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
StuckyTPaytonSOttensmannJ (2016) Intra- and inter neighborhood income inequality and crime. Journal of Crime and Justice39(3): 345–362.
75.
SureshGTewksburyR (2013) Locations of motor vehicle theft and recovery. American Journal of Criminal Justice38(2): 200–215.
76.
SutherlandABrutton-SmithIJacksonJ (2013) Collective efficacy, deprivation and violence in London. British Journal of Criminology53(6): 1050–1074.
77.
TaniguchiTSalvatoreC (2012) Exploring the relationship between drug and alcohol treatment facilities and violent and property crime: A socioeconomic contingent relationship. Security Journal25(2): 95–115.
78.
WalshJTaylorR (2007) Community structural predictors of spatially aggregated motor vehicle theft rates: Do they replicate?Journal of Criminal Justice35(3): 297–311.
79.
WeisburdDBruinsmaGBernascoW (2009) Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical development, critical issues, and open questions. In: WeisburdDBernascoWBruinsmaG (eds) Putting Crime in Its Place. Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–31.
80.
WeisburdDDavisMGillC (2015) Increasing collective efficacy and social capital at crime hot spots: New crime control tools for police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice9(3): 265–274.
81.
WeisburdDGroffEYangS (2014) The importance of both opportunity and social disorganization theory in a future research agenda to advance criminological theory and crime prevention at places. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(4): 499–508.
