A growing body of literature has attempted to understand the social integration of rural migrants in Chinese cities, and specifically patterns and determinants of migrant settlement intention. However, few studies have directly investigated the role of housing access in migrant settlement in cities. Based on a 12-city migrant survey conducted in 2009, this paper adopts the structural equation modelling approach to delineate the causal relationship between housing access and migrant settlement intention. We found a positive correlation between access to formal housing and stronger settlement intention, but such relationship was more attributed to a sorting process in which rural migrants who are more willing to settle down strive to expand their access to formal housing. Meanwhile, controlling for socio-demographic variables, sociocultural attachment factors are more significant predictors of migrant settlement intention than economic opportunities and achievements. These findings imply the necessity of a combination of affordable housing policy and other social policy measures if the government hopes to achieve the goal of boosting permanent settlement of rural migrants in cities and towns.
AlbertsHHazenH (2005) There are always two voices … International students’ intentions to stay in the United States or return to their home countries. International Migration43(3): 131–154.
2.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
ConstantAMasseyDS (2003) Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: A longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. Journal of Population Economics16(4): 631–653.
5.
CPC Central Committee and State Council (2014) National Plan for New Urbanization (2014–2020) [guojia xinxing chengzhenhua guihua (2014–2020)], issued 16March2014. Available at: www.gov.cn (accessed 16 February 2015).
6.
De VroomeTvan TubergenF (2014) Settlement intentions of recently arrived immigrants and refugees in the Netherlands. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies12(1): 47–66.
7.
DustmannCWeissY (2007) Return migration: Theory and empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(2): 236–256.
8.
FanCC (2001) Migration and labor market returns in urban China: Results from a recent survey in Guangzhou. Environment and Planning A33(3): 479–508.
9.
FanCC (2011) Settlement intention and split households: Findings from a survey of migrants in Beijing’s urban villages. China Review11(2): 11–42.
10.
FloraDBCurranPJ (2004) An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods9(4): 466–491.
11.
HaugS (2008) Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(4): 585–605.
12.
HeSLiuYWuF. (2010) Social groups and housing differentiation in China’s urban villages: An institutional interpretation. Housing Studies25(5): 671–691.
13.
HuangY (2003) A room of one’s own: Housing consumption and residential crowding in transitional urban China. Environment and Planning35(4): 591–614.
14.
HuangY (2012) Low-income housing in Chinese cities: Policies and practices. The China Quarterly21(2): 941–964.
15.
HuangYTaoR (2015) Housing migrants in Chinese cities: Current status and policy design. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(3): 640–660.
16.
JassoGRosenzweigMR (1988) How well do U.S. immigrants do? Vintage effects, emigration selectivity, and occupational mobility. Research in Population Economics6: 229–253.
17.
JensenPPedersenPJ (2007) To stay or not to stay? Out-migration of immigrants from Denmark. International Migration45(5): 87–113.
18.
JiangL (2006) Living conditions of the floating population in urban China. Housing Studies21(5): 719–744.
19.
KhraifRM (1992) Permanent versus temporary rural migrants in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A logit analysis of their intentions of future mobility. GeoJournal26(3): 363–370.
20.
KlineRB (2010) Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd edition.New York: Guilford Press.
21.
KlineRB (2012) Assumptions in structural equation modeling. In: HoyleR (ed.) Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 111–125.
22.
KorinekKEntwisleBJampaklayA (2005) Through thick and thin: Layers of social ties and urban settlement among Thai migrants. American Sociological Review70(5): 779–800.
23.
LiSM (2000) Housing consumption in urban China: A comparative study of Beijing and Guangzhou. Environment and Planning A32(6): 1115–1134.
24.
LiSMYiZ (2007) The road to homeownership under market transition: Beijing 1980–2001. Urban Affairs Review42(3): 342–368.
25.
LiuZWangY (2014) Housing access, sense of attachment, and settlement intention of rural migrants in Chinese cities: Findings from a twelve-city migrant survey. In: HuangYLiSM (eds) Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 103–118.
26.
LiuZWangYTaoR (2013) Social capital and migrant housing experiences in urban China: A structural equation model analysis. Housing Studies28(8): 1155–1174.
27.
MasseyDS (1987) Understanding Mexican migration to the United States. American Journal of Sociology92: 1372–1403.
28.
MasseyDSAkreshIR (2006) Immigrant intentions and mobility in a global economy: The attitudes and behavior of recently arrived US immigrants. Social Science Quarterly87(5): 954–971.
29.
ReyesBI (2001) Immigrant trip duration: The case of immigrants from Western Mexico. International Migration Review35(4): 1185–1204.
30.
TaoLHuiECMWongFKW. (2015) Housing choices of migrant workers in China: Beyond the hukou perspective. Habitat International49: 474–483.
31.
WangWWFanCC (2012) Migrant workers’ integration in urban China: Experiences in employment, social adaptation, and self-identity. Eurasian Geography and Economics53(6): 731–749.
32.
WangY (2013) Settlement intention of rural migrants in Chinese cities: Findings from a twelve-city migrant survey. Population Studies [renkou yanjiu]37(4): 19–32.
33.
WangYP (2003) Living conditions of migrants in inland Chinese cities. The Journal of Comparative Asian Development2(1): 47–69.
34.
WangYP (2004) Urban Poverty, Housing and Social Change in China. London and New York: Routledge.
35.
WangYPWangYWuJ (2010) Housing migrant workers in rapidly urbanizing regions: A study of the Chinese model in Shenzhen. Housing Studies25(1): 83–100.
36.
WuF (2012) Neighborhood attachment, social participation, and willingness to stay in China’s low-income communities. Urban Affairs Review48(4): 547–570 .
37.
WuW (2002) Migrant housing in urban China – Choices and constraints. Urban Affairs Review38(1): 90–119.
38.
WuW (2004) Sources of migrant housing disadvantage in urban China. Environment and Planning A36(7): 1285–1304.
39.
ZhuY (2007) China’s floating population and their settlement intention in the cities: Beyond the hukou reform. Habitat International31(1): 65–76.
40.
ZhuYChenW (2010) The settlement intention of China’s floating population in the cities: Recent changes and multifaceted individual-level determinants. Population, Space and Place16(4): 253–267.
