While in Mexico City formal jobs are concentrated in the city centre, affordable housing is generally only available in its outer rings. This reduced accessibility to formal employment would suggest that the poor have longer commutes. However, observed travel times show that low-income workers actually have the shortest commutes. Using two linear programming transportation models we found that this is due to the location of informal work activities, which seems to be a function of the residential location of workers involved in the informal sector as a response to the disadvantages of the formal urban structure of jobs and housing that affect the poor.
AguilarAGAlvaradoC (2005) La reestructuración del espacio urbano de la Ciudad de México. ¿Hacia la metrópoli multinodal? In: Procesos metropolitanos grandes ciudades. Dinámicas recientes en México y otros países. Porrúa, Mexico, pp. 265–308.
2.
AlonsoW (1964) Location and Land Use. Boston: MIT Press.
3.
CasadoJM (2013) Estructura regional de los mercados laborales locales en México. PhD Thesis, Coordinación de Estudios de Posgrado, UNAM, Mexico.
4.
CastellsM (1986) La ciudad y las masas: sociología de los movimientos sociales urbanos. Madrid: Alianza.
5.
CastellsMPortesA (1989) World underneath: The origins, dynamics and effects of the informal economy. In: PortesACastellsMBentonLA (eds) The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 11–37.
6.
CerveraM (1995) La encuesta origen y destino de los viajes de los residentes del AMCM. In: ChíasL (ed.) El transporte metropolitano hoy. Mexico City: UNAM, pp. 73–84.
7.
CerveroR (1989) Jobs–housing balance and regional mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association55: 136–150.
8.
CerveroR (1995a) Paradigm shift: From automobility to accessibility planning. Working paper. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley.
9.
CerveroR (1995b) Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Working paper 640. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
10.
CerveroR (1996) Jobs–housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts from the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association62(4): 492–511.
11.
CerveroRWuKL (1997) Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A29(5): 865–886.
12.
ChappleK (2001) Time to work: Job search strategies and commute time for women on welfare in San Francisco. Journal of Urban Affairs23(2): 155–173.
13.
ChappleK (2006) Overcoming mismatch: Beyond dispersal, mobility, and development strategies. Journal of the American Planning Association72(3): 322–336.
14.
Cruz RodríguezMS (2001) Propiedad, poblamiento y periferia rural en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de México. Puebla: Red de Investigación Urbana, UAM.
15.
de SotoH (1989) The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism. New York: Basic Books.
16.
de SotoH (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GiulianoG (1995) The weakening transportation-land use connection. Access Magazine, 3–11.
18.
GiulianoGSmallKA (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?Urban Studies30: 1485–1500.
19.
GlaeserELKahnME (2003) Sprawl and urban growth. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper series, 9733.
20.
GraizbordB (2008) Geografía del transporte en el área metropolitana de la Ciudad de México. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
21.
GuerraE (2013) The new suburbs: Evolving travel behavior, the built environment, and subway investments in Mexico City. PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA.
22.
HansonSPrattG (1995) Gender, Work, and Space. London: Psychology Press.
23.
HornerMW (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting. Environment and Planning A34: 543–566.
24.
HornerMO’KellyME (2007) Is non-work travel excessive?Journal of Transport Geography15(6): 411–416.
25.
INEGI (2007) Encuesta Origen Destino de los Viajes de los Residentes de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.
26.
INEGI (2009) Censo Económico. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.
27.
INEGI (2010a) Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.
28.
INEGI (2010b) XIII Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010, Base de datos de la muestra. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.
29.
INEGI (2014) Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo 2014. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.
30.
IslasV (2000) Llegando tarde al compromiso: la crisis del transporte en la Ciudad de México. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
31.
KainJ (1968) Housing segregation, negro employment and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics82: 175–197.
32.
KimS (1995) Excess commuting for two-worker households in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Economics38: 166–182.
33.
LevinsonDKumarA (1997) Density and the journey to work. Growth and Change28: 147–172.
34.
MaKRBanisterD (2006) Extended excess commuting: A measure of the jobs–housing imbalance in Seoul. Urban Studies43(11): 2099–2113.
35.
MaloneyWF (1999) Does informality imply segmentation in urban labor markets?The World Bank Economic Review13(2): 275–302.
36.
MaloneyWF (2004) Informality revisited. World Development32(7): 1159–1178.
37.
MéndezB (2006) Estrategias de localización del comercio en vía pública en el Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México. In: CruzMS (ed.) Espacios Metropolitanos 2: Población, Planeación y Políticas de Gobierno. Puebla: UAM-RNIU, pp. 83–114.
38.
MollenkopfJCastellsM (eds) (1991) Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
NavarroB (1988) El transporte de la fuerza laboral. In: BenítezRMorelosJB (eds) Grandes problemas de la Ciudad de México. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdez, pp. 243–264.
40.
PerlmanJ (1976) The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
RubalcavaRSchteingartM (2012) Ciudades divididas, desigualdad y segregación social en México. Mexico: El Colegio de México.
42.
SassenS (1991) The Global City. New York, London, Tokyo and Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
SchteingartM (2010) División social del espacio y segregación en la Ciudad de México. Continuidad y cambios en las ultimas décadas. In: GarzaGSchteingartM (eds) Los grandes problemas de México, Desarrollo urbano y regional. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, pp. 345–387.
44.
ScottMUrryJ (1994) Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
45.
SimpsonWvan der VeenA (1992) The economics of commuting and the urban labor market. Journal of Economic Surveys6(1): 45–62.
46.
SmallKASongS (1992) Wasteful commuting: A resolution. Journal of Political Economy100(4): 888–898.
47.
SobrinoJ (2008) Movilidad intrametropolitana en la Ciudad de México. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos22(7): 583–617.
48.
StollMARaphaelS (2000) Racial differences in spatial job search patterns: Exploring the causes and consequences. Economic Geography76: 201–223.
49.
StorperMWalkerR (1983) The theory of labor and the theory of location. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research7(1): 1–43.
50.
SuárezMDelgadoJ (2007) Estructura y eficiencia urbanas: Accesibilidad a empleos, localización residencial e ingreso en la ZMCM 1990–2000. Economía, Sociedad y TerritorioVI(23): 693–724.
51.
SuárezMDelgadoJ (2009) Is Mexico City polycentric? A trip attraction capacity approach. Urban Studies46(10): 2187–2211.
52.
SuárezMDelgadoJ (2010) Patrones de movilidad residencial en la Ciudad de México como evidencia de co-localización de población y empleos. EURE36(107): 67–91.
53.
SultanaS (2006) What about dual-earner households in jobs–housing balance research? An essential issue in transport geography. Journal of Transport Geography14(5): 393–395.
54.
ThomasJJ (1995) Surviving in the City: The Urban Informal Sector in Latin America. London: Pluto Press.
55.
UN-HABITAT (2013) Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements. Report for UN-HABITAT.
56.
WardPM (1998) Mexico City. Chichester and New York: John Wiley & Sons.
57.
WeinbergerRSuárezMChappleK (2007) It’s not worth the trip: Urban structure and job formality in Los Angeles, Mexico City, and New York. In: Transportation Research Board 86th annual meeting, Washington, DC, 21–25 January 2007. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
58.
WhiteM (1988) Urban commuting journeys are not wasteful. Journal of Political Economy96(5): 1097–1110.
59.
WilliamsM (2005) Comercio callejero en la Delegación Coyoacán y micro-territorios; enfoques para el desarrollo de políticas públicas. Mexico: CENVI and Secretaría de Desarrollo Social del Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
60.
World Bank (2009) Reshaping economic geography. World development report, Washington, DC, USA.
61.
YangJ (2005) Commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: A comparison of Atlanta and Boston. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy35(6): 9–78.
