Accompanied by higher levels of car ownership, suburbanisation in Western countries has a significant impact on motorised travel and long-distance trips. Chinese cities share some of the suburbanisation trends and patterns of the United States as well as an increasing number of cars, while there are still great contextual variations. Through a comparative study of activity space in two inner suburban areas with different built environments, Beijing in China and Chicago in the US, this paper examines how suburbanisation influences individuals’ activity-travel behaviour. The results indicate that changing urban form has a significant impact on activity space. However, the determinants of activity space in Beijing are quite different from those in Chicago. In Beijing, increasing car ownership leads to more differentiation among suburban residents. In Chicago, encouraging high-density land use patterns may lead to more localised activity space.
Beijing Transportation Research Center (2013) 2013 Annual Report. Beijing: Beijing Transportation Research Center.
2.
BhatCRSrinivasanS (2005) A multidimensional mixed ordered-response model for analyzing weekend activity participation. Transportation Research Part B39(3): 255–278.
3.
BuliungRNKanaroglouPS (2006) Urban form and household activity-travel behavior. Growth and Change37(2): 172–199.
4.
BuliungRNRemmelTK (2008) Open source, spatial analysis, and activity-travel behaviour research: Capabilities of the aspace package. Journal of Geographical Systems10(2): 191–216.
5.
BuliungRNRoordaMJRemmelTK (2008) Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: Initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS). Transportation35(6): 697–722.
6.
CalthorpeP (1993) The Next American Metropolis. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
7.
CerveroRKockelmanK (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment2(3): 199–219.
8.
CerveroRWuKL (1998) Sub-centring and commuting: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area, 1980–90. Urban Studies35(7): 1059–1076.
9.
ChaiY (2013) Space–time behavior research in China: Recent development and future prospect. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(5): 1093–1099.
10.
ChapinFSJr (1968) Activity systems and urban structure: A working schema. Journal of the American Institute of Planners34(1): 11–18.
11.
ClarkWAVOnakaJ (1983) Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Studies20(1): 47–57.
12.
CraneR (1996) On form versus function: Will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase it?Journal of Planning Education and Research15(2): 117–126.
13.
DijstM (1999) Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two Dutch communities. GeoJournal48(3): 195–206.
14.
FanYKhattakAJ (2008) Urban form, individual spatial footprints, and travel: Examination of space-use behavior. Journal of the Transportation Research Board2082: 98–106.
15.
FengJDijstMPrillwitzJ. (2013) Travel time and distance in international perspective: A comparison between Nanjing (China) and the Randstad (The Netherlands). Urban Studies50(14): 2993–3010.
16.
FengJZhouYWuF (2008) New trends of suburbanization in Beijing since 1990: From government-led to market-oriented. Regional Studies42(1): 83–99.
17.
GiulianoGNarayanD (2003) Another look at travel patterns and urban form: The US and Great Britain. Urban Studies40(11): 2295–2312.
18.
GolledgeRGStimsonRJ (1997) Spatial Behavior. New York: The Guilford Press.
19.
HägerstrandT (1967) Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
HandySCaoXMokhtarianP (2005) Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment10(6): 427–444.
21.
Holz-RauCScheinerJSicksK (2014) Travel distances in daily travel and long-distance travel: What role is played by urban form?Environment and Planning A46(2): 488–507.
22.
HongJShenQZhangL (2014) How do built-environment factors affect travel behavior? A spatial analysis at different geographic scales. Transportation41(3): 419–440.
23.
HortonFEReynoldsDR (1971) Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior. Economic Geography47(1): 36–48.
24.
HudsonJC (2006) Chicago: A Geography of the City and its Region. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
JangTYHwangJW (2009) Direct and indirect effects on weekend travel behaviors. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering13(3): 169–178.
26.
JonesMPebleyAR (2014) Redefining neighborhoods using common destinations: Social characteristics of activity spaces and home census tracts compared. Demography51(3): 727–752.
27.
KangHScottDM (2010) Exploring day-to-day variability in time use for household members. Transportation Research Part A44(8): 609–619.
28.
KhattakAJRodriguezD (2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice39(6): 481–500.
29.
KwanMP (1998) Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis30(3): 191–216.
30.
KwanMP (1999) Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of nonemployment activities. Economic Geography75(4): 370–394.
31.
KwanMP (2000) Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: A methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies8(1): 185–203.
32.
KwanMP (2013) Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(5): 1078–1086.
33.
KwanMPKotsevA (2015) Gender differences in commute time and accessibility in Sofia, Bulgaria: A study using 3D geovisualisation. The Geographical Journal181(1): 83–96.
34.
KwanMPWeberJ (2003) Individual accessibility revisited: The implications of changing urban form and human spatial behavior. Geographical Analysis35(4): 341–353.
35.
KwanMPChaiYTana (2014) Reflections on the similarities and differences between Chinese and US cities. Asian Geographer31(2): 167–174.
36.
LeeJSNamJLeeSS (2014) Built environment impacts on individual mode choice: An empirical study of the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation8(6): 447–470.
37.
LenntorpB (1976) Paths in space–time environments: A time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography Series B Human Geography44: 147–150.
38.
LiZWuW (2008) Tenure-based residential segregation in post-reform Chinese cities: A case study of Shanghai. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(3): 404–419.
39.
McMillenDP (2003) Employment subcenters in Chicago: Past, present, and future. Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago27(2): 2–14.
40.
NæssP (2011) New urbanism or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use4(1): 25–44.
41.
NewsomeTHWalcottWASmithPD (1998) Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation25(4): 357–377.
42.
PáezAMercadoRGFarberS. (2010) Relative accessibility deprivation indicators for urban settings: Definitions and application to food deserts in Montreal. Urban Studies47(7): 1415–1438.
43.
SaelensBESallisJFBlackJB. (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1552–1558.
44.
SchönfelderSAxhausenKW (2003) Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion?Transport Policy10(4): 273–286.
45.
ShenQ (1997) Urban transportation in Shanghai, China: Problems and planning implications. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21(4): 589–606.
46.
ShermanJESpencerJPreisserJS. (2005) A suite of methods for representing activity space in a healthcare accessibility study. International Journal of Health Geographics4(1): 24–45.
47.
ShortJRHanlonBVicinoTJ (2007) The decline of inner suburbs: The new suburban gothic in the United States. Geography Compass1(3): 641–656.
48.
StollMACovingtonK (2012) Explaining racial/ethnic gaps in spatial mismatch in the US: The primacy of racial segregation. Urban Studies49(11): 2501–2521.
WangDChaiY (2009) The jobs–housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China: The legacy of Danwei.Journal of Transport Geography17(1): 30–38.
51.
WangDLiFChaiY (2012) Activity spaces and sociospatial segregation in Beijing. Urban Geography33(2): 256–277.
52.
WangF (2000) Modeling commuting patterns in Chicago in a GIS environment: A job accessibility perspective. The Professional Geographer52(1): 120–133.
53.
WeberJ (2003) Individual accessibility and distance from major employment centers: An examination using space–time measures. Journal of Geographical Systems5(1): 51–70.
54.
WeberJKwanMP (2002) Bringing time back in: A study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. The Professional Geographer54(2): 226–240.
55.
WeberJKwanMP (2003) Evaluating the effects of geographical contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography24(8): 647–671.
56.
WiesK (2008) Household Travel and Activity Inventory. Chicago: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning.
57.
WongDWShawSL (2011) Measuring segregation: An activity space approach. Journal of Geographical Systems13(2): 127–145.
58.
WuF (2005) Rediscovering the ‘gate’ under market transition: From work-unit compounds to commodity housing enclaves. Housing Studies20(2): 235–254.
59.
ZenkSNSchulzAJMatthewsSA. (2011) Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: A pilot study. Health and Place17(5): 1150–1161.
60.
ZhangYChaiY (2009) Characteristics of commuting pattern in Beijing: Based on the comparison of different urban residential areas. Geographical Research28(5): 1327–1340.
61.
ZhaoPLuB (2011) Managing urban growth to reduce motorised travel in Beijing: One method of creating a low-carbon city. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management54(7): 959–977.
62.
ZhaoPLüBde RooG (2011) Impact of the jobs–housing balance on urban commuting in Beijing in the transformation era. Journal of Transport Geography19(1): 59–69.
63.
ZhouY (1996) On the suburbanization of Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica16(3): 198–206.
