The aim of this research is to study the emergence and evolution of the multi-storey extension (MSE) of socialist blocks of flats in the form of additional storeys or lofts on top of host buildings, which is seen as a dominant model of post-socialist spatial change in inherited multi-storey housing areas in Serbia. Relying on an analysis of empirical data sources, interviews, observation and a comparative analysis, the paper investigates the MSE as a predominantly self-organising process. It also considers its manifestations at different operational and spatial levels in the study area of the city of Nis. It is argued that the MSE, under conditions of low economic capacity, an indifferent attitude of local authorities, an inconsistent legislative environment, and the market as an essential driving force of the process, results in uneven urban transformations, both in physical and social terms.
BouzarovskiSSalukvadzeJGentileM (2011) A socially resilient urban transition? The contested landscapes of apartment building extensions in two post-communist cities. Urban Studies48(13): 2689–2714.
2.
BorénTGentileM (2007) Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler B89(2): 95–110.
3.
BurawoyMVerderyK (1999) Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocial World. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
4.
ClaphamDHegedusJKintreaK. (1996) Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT; London: Greenwood Press.
5.
DamjanovicDGligorijevicZ (eds) (2010) Socijalno stanovanje, Prikaz stambenih politika Srbije i odabranih zemalja Evrope. Beograd: Palgo centar.
6.
DjordjevicM (2004) Reducing housing poverty in Serbian urban centers: Analysis and policy recommendations. In: FearnJ (ed.) Too Poor To Move, Too Poor To Stay: A Report on Housing in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, pp. 100–101.
7.
Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) (2006) Country Profiles on The Housing-Serbia and Montenegro. Report no.ECE/HBP/139. Geneva: United Nations.
8.
FranklinB (2006) Housing Transformations: Shaping the Space of Twenty-first Century Living. London: Routledge.
9.
GehlJ (1980) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Denmark: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.
10.
GolubchikovOBadyinaAMakhrovaA (2014) The hybrid spatialities of transition: Capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring. Urban Studies51(4): 617–633.
11.
Gradska stambena agencija Nis (HACN) (2006) Stambeni profil grada Nisa. (Housing Agency of the City of Nis – Housing Profile) Report, Nis: Grad Nis.
12.
HardinGBadenJ (eds) (1977) Managing the Commons. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
13.
HarveyD (1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
HegedusJTosicsI (1996) The disintegration of the East European housing model. In: ClaphamDHegedusJKintreaKetal. (eds) Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT; London: Greenwood Press, pp. 15–40.
16.
HegedusJMayoETosicsI (1996) Transition of the Housing Sector in the East-Central European Countries. Budapest: USAID, Metropolitan Research Institute.
17.
HirtS (2012) Iron Curtains: Gates, Suburbs and Privatization of Space in the Post-socialist City. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
18.
HirtSStanilovK (2007) The perils of post-socialist transformation: Residential development in Sofia. In: StanilovK (ed.) The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe After Socialism. London: Springer, pp. 215–244.
19.
HirtSStanilovK (2009) Twenty Years of Transition: The Evolution of Urban Planning in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1989–2009. Human Settlements Global Dialogue Series No. 5, Report no. HS/1147/09E, Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.
20.
KrsticABogdanovA (2003) Informaciona osnova o stanju krovova i potkrovlja u Beogradu. Energetska optimizacija zgrada u kontekstu odrzive arhitekture, deo 1, Analiza strukture gradjevinskog fonda. Naucno istrazivački projekat, Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
21.
KuzmanovL (2009) Posledice procesa nadogradnji stambenih zgrada u Novom Sadu. Nauka+Praksa12(2): 12–15.
22.
KvaleS (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
23.
LefebvreH (1974[1991]) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
24.
MandicS (2001) Residential mobility versus ‘in-place’ adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society ‘in transition’. Housing Studies16: 53–73.
25.
OlsonM (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PetovarK (2003) Urbana sociologija – Nasi gradovi izmedju drzave i gradjanina. Beograd: Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu i Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije.
28.
PetrovicM (2001) Post-Socialist housing policy transformation in Yugoslavia and Belgrade. International Journal for Housing Policy2: 211–231.
29.
RandjelovicMVujanacBStefanovicI. (2009) Profil Zajednice Grada Nisa. Nis: KLER.
30.
Sailer-FliegeU (1999) Characteristics of post-socialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. Geo-Journal49: 7–16.
SmithN (1990) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
SoaitaAM (2012) Strategies for in situ home improvement in Romanian large housing estates. Housing Studies27(7): 1008–1030.
34.
StruykR (ed.) (1996) Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
35.
TemelovaJNovakJOurednicekM. (2011) Housing estates in the Czech Republic after socialism: Various trajectories and inner differentiation. Urban Studies48(9): 1811–1834.
36.
TosicsI (2004) Determinants and consequences of spatial change in post-socialist cities. In: TsenkovaSBudic-NedovicZ (eds) Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-communist Cities. University of Illinois Urbana Champaign: Russian and East European Centre
37.
TsenkovaS (2000) Housing in Transition and Transition in Housing: The Experience of Central and Eastern Europe. Sofia: Kapital Reclama.
38.
TsenkovaS (2005) Trends and Progress in Housing Reformas in South Eastern Europe. Paris: Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB).
39.
TsenkovaS (2013) Housing Policy and Practice: Trasition, Complexity and Opportunity. Lap Lambert.
40.
VasilevskaLVranicPMarinkovicA (2014) The effects of changes to the post-socialist urban planning framework on public open spaces in multi-story housing areas: A view from Nis, Serbia. Cities36: 83–92.
41.
VujovicSPetrovicM (2007) Belgrade’s post-socialist urban evolution: Reflections by the actors in the development process. In: StanilovK (ed.) The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe After Socialism. London: Springer, pp. 361–383.
