Using nine successive waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) data set, this study employs hierarchical age-period-cohort logistic models (HAPC) to analyse temporal patterns of urban homeownership from 1989 to 2011. With the changing meaning of homeownership due to housing reforms, the strong period increases in homeownership track policy changes and the most dramatic increase occurs mainly in the era of housing privatisation rather than housing commodification. The temporal analyses also offer insights into housing stratification from redistribution to markets. The positive effect of education on homeownership is explained by period increases in homeownership, whereas working in state sectors has persistently attached to preferred housing-tenure choice before and after the housing reforms. Moreover, the significant cohort effect lends support to strengthened temporal inequalities in the reform era. These findings not only provide a dynamic understanding of housing stratification in (post)socialist societies, but call for the need to incorporate temporal dimensions into urban studies, especially those on a society experiencing rapid social and institutional changes.
AdamsB (2009) Macroeconomic implications of China urban housing privatization, 1998–1999. Journal of Contemporary China18(62): 881–888.
2.
BianYLoganJR (1996) Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review61(5): 739–758.
3.
ChenJGuoFWuY (2011) One decade of urban housing reform in China: Urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005. Habitat International35(1): 1–8.
4.
ChenJHaoQStephensM (2010) Assessing housing affordability in post-reform China: A case study of Shanghai. Housing Studies25(6): 877–901.
5.
ChiuRLH (2001) Commdification of housing with Chinese characteristics. Review of Policy Research18(1): 75–95.
6.
ClarkWALedwithV (2012) Mobility, housing stress, and neighborhood contexts: Evidence from Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A38(6): 1077–1093.
7.
DavisDS (2003) From welfare benefit to capitalized asset: The re-commodification of residential space in urban China. In: ForrestRLeeJ (eds) Housing and Social Change: East–West Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 183–196.
8.
DavisDS (2004) Talking About Property in the New Chinese Domestic Property Regime. In: DobbinF (ed.) The Sociology of the Economy. Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 288–307.
9.
ElderGHJohnsonMKCrosnoeR (2003) The emergence and development of life course theory. In: MortimerJTShanahanMJ (eds) Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 3–19.
10.
FuQ (2015) When fiscal recentralisation meets urban reforms: Prefectural land finance and its association with access to housing in urban China. Urban Studies52(10): 1791–1809.
11.
FuQLinN (2013) Local state marketism: An institutional analysis of China’s urban housing and land market. Chinese Sociological Review46(1): 3–24.
12.
FuQLinN (2014) The weaknesses of civic territorial organizations: Civic engagement and homeowners associations in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(6): 2309–2327.
13.
FuQRenQ (2010) Educational inequality under China’s rural–urban divide: The Hukou system and returns to education. Environment and Planning A42(3): 592–610.
14.
FuQZhuYRenQ (2015) The downside of marketization: A multilevel analysis of housing tenure and types in reform-era urban China. Social Science Research49: 126–140.
15.
GaubatzP (1999) China’s urban transformation: Patterns and processes of morphological change in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Urban Studies36(9): 1495–1521.
16.
HsingY-t (2010) The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
HuangY (2003) A room of one’s own: Housing consumption and residential crowding in transitional urban China. Environment and Planning A35(4): 591–614.
18.
HuangY (2004) Housing markets, government behaviors, and housing choice: A case study of three cities in China. Environment and Planning A36(1): 45–68.
19.
HuangYClarkWAV (2002) Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: A multilevel analysis. Urban Studies39(1): 7–32.
20.
KeatR (1981) Individualism and community in socialist thought. In: MephamJRubenD-H (eds) Issues in Marxist Philosophy. Sussex: Harvester Press, pp. 127–152.
21.
LiS-m (2012) Housing inequalities under market deepening: The case of Guangzhou, China. Environment and Planning A44(12): 2852–2866.
22.
LiS-MLiL (2006) Life course and housing tenure change in urban China: A study of Guangzhou. Housing Studies21(5): 653–670.
23.
LiS-mYiZ (2007) The road to homeownership under market transition Beijing 1980–2001. Urban Affairs Review42(3): 342–368.
24.
LinGCS (2007) Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanisation: New city-based and land-centred urban transformation. Urban Studies44(9): 1827–1855.
25.
LinNBianY (1991) Getting ahead in urban China. American Journal of Sociology97(3): 657–688.
26.
LittellRCMillikenGAStroupWW. (2006) SAS for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
27.
LiuYHeSWuF (2012) Housing differentiation under market transition in Nanjing, China. The Professional Geographer64(4): 554–571.
28.
LoganJRBianYBianF (1999) Housing inequality in urban China in the 1990s. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23(1): 7–25.
29.
LoganJRFangYZhangZ (2009) Access to housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(4): 914–935.
30.
LoganJRFangYZhangZ (2010) The winners in China’s urban housing reform. Housing Studies25(1): 101–117.
31.
LuD (2006) Remaking Chinese Urban Form: Modernity, Scarcity and Space, 1949–2005. New York: Taylor & Francis.
MyersDLeeSW (1996) Immigration cohorts and residential overcrowding in southern California. Demography33(1): 51–65.
34.
MyersDLeeSW (1998) Immigrant trajectories into homeownership: A temporal analysis of residential assimilation. International Migration Review32(3): 593–625.
35.
NeeV (1989) A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review54(5): 663–681.
36.
ÖstCE (2012) Parental wealth and first-time homeownership: A cohort study of family background and young adults’ housing situation in Sweden. Urban Studies49(10): 2137–2152.
37.
PopkinBM (2008) Will China’s nutrition transition overwhelm its health care system and slow economic growth?Health Affairs27(4): 1064–1076.
38.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
RobinsonGK (1991) That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statistical Science6(1): 15–32.
40.
RossiPH (1980) Why Families Move. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
RyderNB (1965) The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review30(6): 843–861.
42.
SaundersP (1984) Beyond housing classes: The sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research8(2): 202–227.
43.
State Council (1994) The Decision on Deepening the Reform of Urban Housing System. Beijing: Document No. 43.
44.
State Council (1998) A Notification from the State Council on Further Deepening the Reform of Urban Housing System and Accelerating Housing Construction. Beijing: Document No. 23.
45.
TangB-sWongS-wLiuS-c (2011) Institutions, property taxation and local government finance in China. Urban Studies48(5): 847–875.
46.
WangS-Y (2011) State misallocation and housing prices: Theory and evidence from China. The American Economic Review101(5): 2081–2107.
47.
WangYP (2001) Urban housing reform and finance in China: A case study of Beijing. Urban Affairs Review36(5): 620–645.
48.
WangYPMurieA (1996) The process of commercialisation of urban housing in China. Urban Studies33(6): 971–989.
49.
WangYPMurieA (2011) The new affordable and social housing provision system in China: Implications for comparative housing studies. International Journal of Housing Policy11(3): 237–254.
50.
WeberM (1946) Class, status, party. In: GerthHHMillsCW (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, pp. 180–195.
51.
WuF (1996) Changes in the structure of public housing provision in urban China. Urban Studies33(9): 1601–1627.
52.
WuF (2001) Housing provision under globalisation: A case study of Shanghai. Environment and Planning A33(10): 1741–1764.
53.
WuF (2004) Residential relocation under market-oriented redevelopment: The process and outcomes in urban China. Geoforum35(4): 453–470.
54.
WuFXuJYehAG-O (2007) Urban Development in Post-reform China: State, Market, and Space. London: Routledge.
55.
YangY (2008) Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review73(2): 204–226.
56.
YangYLandKC (2013) Age-Period-Cohort Analysis: New Models, Methods, and Empirical Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
57.
YeungSC-WHowesR (2006) The role of the Housing Provident Fund in financing affordable housing development in China. Habitat International30(2): 343–356.
58.
YingQLuoDChenJ (2013) The determinants of homeownership affordability among the ‘sandwich class’: Empirical findings from Guangzhou, China. Urban Studies50(9): 1870–1888.
59.
YuanS (1997) Evaluation of China’s Urban Housing Reform. Adelaide: University of Adelaide, Chinese Economies Research Centre, pp. 1–39.
60.
ZhangL (2008) Private Homes, Distinct Lifestyles: Performing a New Middle Class. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
ZhouMLoganJR (1996) Market transition and the commodification of housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20(3): 400–421.
