With the aim of making a city sustainable, this paper evaluates the impact of setting up urban toll on inequalities. We use several indicators (Gini, Theil and Atkinson indices) to measure changes in the concentration of incomes and gravity-based accessibility. In the case of the Lyon Metropolitan Area (France), we simulate a cordon pricing and evaluate its impacts on inequalities. We adopt a comparison-based approach to reduce the bias resulting from the spatial division. In agreement with the literature, we show that different inequality indicators produce contrasted and sometimes contradictory results, both at the scale of zones or metropolitan level. Results from Theil and Atkinson indicators point out introducing a toll can reduce inequalities in the most peripheral zones. Although we observe an accessibility improvement, particularly for central zones, the first ring (adjacent to the toll zone) is the most adversely affected by toll.
BonnafousACrozetYMercierA. (2010) MOSART et le projet PLAINSUDD: Une plate-forme de modélisation et de simulation de l’accessibilité pour l’aide à la décision et l’aménagement du territoire. In: AntoniJ-P (ed.) Modéliser la ville. Predit: Economica, pp. 186–210.
7.
BonsallPKellyC (2005) Road user charging and social exclusion: The impact of congestion charges on at-risk groups. Transport Policy12: 406–418.
8.
BörjessonMFosgerauMAlgersS (2012) On the income elasticity of the value of travel time. Transportation Research Part A46: 368–377.
9.
ChakravartySR (1996) A measurement of spatial disparity: The case of income inequality. Urban Studies33(9): 1671–1996.
10.
ChakravartySR (1999) Measuring inequality: The axiomatic approach. In: SilberJ (ed.) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163–186.
11.
ChurchAFrostMSullivanK (2000) Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy7: 195–205.
12.
Condeço-MelhoradoAGutierrezJGarcia-PalomaresJC (2011) Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion. Transportation Research Part A45: 185–203.
13.
CowelFA (2000) Measurement of inequality. In: AtkinsonABBourguignonF (eds) Handbook of Income Distribution, 1, Collect. Handbooks in Economics 16, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 84–166.
14.
CowellFFlachaireE (2007) Income distribution and inequality measurement: The problem of extreme values. Journal of Econometrics141: 1044–1072.
15.
DagumC (1980) Inequality measures between income distributions with applications. Econometrica48(7): 1791–1803.
16.
DeltasG (2003) The small sample bias of the Gini coefficient: Results and implications for empirical research. Review of Economics and Statistics85(1): 226–234.
17.
DenisVRuizN (2009) Mesurer les inégalités. Cahiers Français351: La Documentation Française, pp. 22–28.
18.
DialRB (1999) Minimal-revenue congestion pricing part I: A fast algorithm for the single-origin case. Transportation Research Part B33: 189–202.
19.
DurantonGOvermanHG (2005) Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. The Review of Economic Studies72(4): 1077–1106.
20.
DuroJA (2012) On the automatic application of inequality indexes in the analysis of the international distribution of environmental indicators. Ecological Economics76: 1–7.
21.
EliassonJ (2009) Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial. Transport Policy15(6): 395–404.
22.
EliassonJMattssonL-G (2006) Equity effects of congestion pricing. Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A40: 602–620.
23.
EvansAW (1992) Road congestion pricing: When is it a good policy?Journal of Transport Economics and Policy26: 213–244.
24.
FotheringhamASO’KellyME (1989) Spatial Interaction Model: Formulations and Applications. Dortrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 244 pp.
25.
GeursKTvan WeeGP (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography12: 127–140.
26.
GiniC (1921) Measurement of inequality of incomes, Economic Journal31: 124–126.
27.
GiulianoG (1992) An assessment of the political acceptability of congestion pricing. Transportation19(4): 335–358.
28.
GlazerA (1981) Congestion tolls and consumer welfare. Public Finance36: 77–83.
29.
GrengsJ (2010) Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. Journal of Transport Geography18: 42–54.
30.
GuttmanJ (1975) Avoiding specification errors in estimating the value of time. Transportation4: 19–42.
31.
HandyS (1992) Regional versus local accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment18: 253–267.
32.
HandyS (1993) A cycle of dependence: Automobiles, accessibility, and the evolution of the transportation and retail hierarchies. Berkeley Planning Journal8: 21–43.
33.
HandySLNiemeierDA (1997) Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A29: 1175–1194.
34.
HansenWG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners25: 73–76.
35.
HollA (2007) Twenty years of accessibility improvements. The case of the Spanish motorway building program. Journal of Transport Geography15: 86–297.
36.
HouQLiS-M (2011) Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990–2020. Journal of Transport Geography19: 1350–1360.
37.
IaconoMKrizekKJEl-GeneidyA (2010) Measuring non-motorised accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography18: 133–140.
JeneliusEMattssonL-GLevinsonD (2011) Traveler delay costs and value of time with trip chains, flexible activity scheduling and information. Transportation Research Part B45: 789–807.
40.
JonesPLucasK (2012) The social consequences of transport decision making: Clarifying concepts, synthesizing knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography21: 4–16.
41.
KarlströmAFranklinJ (2009) Behavioral adjustments and equity effects of congestion pricing: Analysis of morning commuters during Stockholm trial. Transportation Research Part A43: 283–296.
42.
KoenigJG (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application. Transportation9: 145–172.
43.
Kwan M-P (1998) Space–time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a pointbased framework. Geographical Analysis30(3): 191–216.
44.
KwanMPWeberJ (2008) Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction. Applied Geography28: 110–123.
45.
LeapeJ (2006) The London congestion charge. Journal of Economic Perspectives20(4): 157–176.
46.
LermanRYitzhakiS (1989) Improving the accuracy of estimates of Gini coefficient. Journal of Econometrics42: 43–47.
47.
LimanondTNiemeierDA (2003) Accessibility and mode-destination choice decisions: Exploring travel in three neighborhoods in Puget Sound, WA. Environment and Planning B30: 219–228.
48.
MartensK (2012) Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s ‘Spheres of Justice’ to transport sector. Transportation39(6): 1–19.
49.
MayeresIProostS (2001) Marginal tax reform, externalities and income distribution. Journal of Public Economics79: 343–363.
50.
MercierAStoiberT (2010) Improving accessibility measurement combining transport modelling and GIS analysis: Two examples from France and Germany. In: ViegasJMMacarioR (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 12th WCTR. Lisbon.
51.
Ministère de l’Equipement, des Transports, de l’Aménagement du territoire, du Tourisme et de la Mer (METATM) (2004) Instruction cadre relative aux méthodes d’évaluation économique des grands projets d’infrastructures de transport. METATM. Available at: dtrf.setra.fr/notice.html?id=Dtrf-0003601, 31 pp. + annex.
52.
MorrisJMDumblePLWiganMR (1978) Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research A13: 91–109.
53.
MunS-EAhnK-J (2008) Road pricing in a serial network. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy42(3): 367–395.
54.
Observatoire Partenarial Lyonnais en Economie (OPALE) (2007) CCI Est lyonnais. OPALE. Available at: www.opale-lyon.com, 13 pp.
55.
Observatoire Partenarial Lyonnais en Economie (OPALE) (2009) Les territoires de l’économie lyonnaise – Lyon 7ème. OPALE. Available at: www.opale-lyon.com, 13 pp.
56.
OrtuzarJ-DWillumsenLG (2002) Modelling Transport. 3rd Edition.Chichester: Wiley and Sons, 499 pp.
RamjerdiF (1995) Road Pricing and Toll Financing with Examples from Oslo and Stockholm. Washington, DC: KTH and TOI, 147 pp.
59.
RamjerdiF (2006) Equity measures and their performance in transportation. Journal of Transportation Record Board1983: 67–74.
60.
RauxCSoucheS (2004) The acceptability of urban road pricing: A theoretical analysis applied to experience in Lyon. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy38(2): 191–216.
61.
RauxCMercierAOvtrachtN (2008) Evaluation économique des politiques de transport et indicateurs d’accessibilité spatiale: l’apport des SIG. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Systèmes, Modélisation, Géostatistiques DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.21333, document 435. Available at: http://cybergeo.revues.org/21333.
62.
RauxCSoucheSPonsD (2012) The efficiency of congestion charging: Some lessons from cost-benefit analyses. Research in Transportation Economics36: 85–92.
63.
ReggianiABucciPRussoG. (2011a) Regional labour markets and job accessibility in city network systems in Germany. Journal of Transport Geography9(4): 528–536.
64.
ReggianiABucciPRussoG (2011b) Accessibility and impedance forms: Empirical applications to the German commuting network. International Regional Science Review34(2): 230–252.
65.
RichardsonHW (1974) A note on the distribution effects of road pricing. Journal of Economics and Policy8(1): 82–85.
66.
RietveldPVerhoefET (1998) Social feasibility of policies to reduce externalities in transport. In: ButtonKJVerhoefET (eds) Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment. Cheltenham: E Elgar, Chapter13.
67.
RotarisLDanielisRMarcucciE. (2010) The urban road pricing scheme to curb pollution in Milan, Italy: Description, impacts and preliminary cost–benefit analysis assessment. Transportation Research Part A44(5): 359–375.
68.
RouwendalJVerhoefET (2006) Basic economic principles of road pricing: From theory to applications. Transport Policy13: 106–114.
69.
SantosGRojeyL (2004) Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth. Transportation31(1): 21–42.
70.
ShorrocksAF (1980) The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica48: 613–625.
71.
SongS (1996) Some tests of alternative accessibility measures: A population density approach. Land Economics72(4): 474–482
72.
SpenceNALinnekerBJ (1994) Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography2(4): 247–264.
73.
SumaleeAMayTShepherdS (2005) Comparison of judgmental and optimal road pricing cordons. Transport Policy12: 384–390.
74.
TheilH (1967) Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
75.
TheriaultMVoisinMDes RosiersF (2008) L’accessibilité aux services urbains: Modélisation des différences socio-spatiales et mesure des impacts sur les valeurs résidentielles. In: TheriaultMDes RosiersF (eds) Information géographique et dynamiques urbaines, 2. London: Hermes Sciences Publishing, pp. 119–151.
76.
TillemaTVerhoefEWeeB. (2011) Evaluating the effects of urban congestion pricing: Geographical accessibility versus social surplus. Transportation Planning and Technology34(7): 669–689.
77.
Van WeeBGeursK (2011) Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research11(4): 350–367.
WilligersJFloorHVan WeeB (2007) Accessibility indicators for location choices of offices: An application to the intraregional distributive effects of high-speed rail in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A39: 2086–2098.
80.
WodonQYitzhakiS (2003) The effect of using grouped data on the estimation of the Gini income elasticity. Economics Letters78:153–159.
