This paper analyses the persistence of the shock caused by the American Civil War on the relative city size distribution of the USA. Two features make the study of this conflict interesting. First, it took place at an earlier stage of the industrialisation and urbanisation processes than those previously analysed in the related literature. Second, the battles were fought in the open field, not in urban areas. In line with previous results for the Second World War in Japanese and German cities, our findings suggest that the effects of the shock were transitory. Furthermore, some evidence regarding the possible presence of a ‘safe harbour effect’ is reported.
ArbelYBen-ShaharDGabrielS. (2010) The local cost of terror: Effects of the second Palestinian Intifada on Jerusalem house prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics40(6): 415–426.
2.
BattyM (2006) Rank clocks. Nature444: 592–596.
3.
BeardCABeardMR (1927) The Rise of American Civilization. Volumes I and II. New York: Macmillan.
4.
BeesonPEDeJongDNTroeskenW (2001) Population growth in U.S. counties, 1840–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics31(6): 669–699.
5.
BlackDHendersonJV (1999) Spatial evolution of population and industry in the United States. American Economic Review89(2): 321–327.
6.
BlattmanCMiguelE (2010) Civil war. Journal of Economic Literature48(1): 3–57.
7.
BrakmanSGarretsenMSchramnM (2004) The strategic bombing of German cities during World War II and its impact on city growth. Journal of Economic Geography4: 201–218.
8.
CarterSBCartnerSSHainerMR. (2006) Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Times to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CoaffeeJ (2009) Terrorism, Risk and the Global City: Towards Urban Resilience. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
10.
CochranTC (1961) Did the Civil War retard industrialization?Mississippi Valley Historical Review48: 197–210.
11.
CraggJDonaldS (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econometric Theory9: 222–240.
12.
DavisB (1960) The Civil War: Strange & Fascinating Facts. Westminster: Random House Value Publishing.
13.
DavisDRWeinsteinDE (2002) Bones, bombs and break points: The geography of economic activity. American Economic Review92, 1269–1289.
14.
DehonCGassnerMVerardiV (2009a) Beware of ‘good’ outliers and overoptimistic conclusions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics71(3): 437–452.
15.
DehonCGassnerMVerardiV (2009b) A Hausman-type test to detect the presence of influential outliers in regression analysis. Economics Letters105: 64–67.
16.
EatonJEcksteinZ (1997) Cities and growth: Theory and evidence from France and Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics27(4–5): 443–474.
17.
EngermanSL (1966) The economic impact of the Civil War. Explorations in Entrepreneurial History3: 176–199.
18.
FreyWH (1990) Metropolitan America: Beyond the transition. Population Bulletin45(2): 2–49.
19.
FullerW (1977) Some properties of a modification of the limited information estimator. Econometrica45: 939–953.
20.
GabaixXIoannidesYM (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: HendersonJVThisseJF (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 2341–2378.
21.
GlaeserEShapiroJ (2002) Cities and warfare: The impact of terrorism on urban form. Journal of Urban Economics51: 205–224.
22.
GoldinCLewisF (1975) The economic costs of the American Civil War: Estimates and implications. Journal of Economic History35: 299–326.
23.
GoldinCLewisF (1978) The post-bellum recovery of the South and the cost of the Civil War: Comment. Journal of Economic History38: 487–492.
24.
GreenbaumRTDuganLLaFreeG (2007) The impact of terrorism on Italian employment and business activity. Urban Studies44(5–6): 1093–1108.
25.
GundersonG (1974) The origin of the American Civil War. Journal of Economic History34: 915–950.
26.
HackerL (1940) The Triumph of American Capitalism: The Development of Forces in American History to the End of the Nineteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
HazamSFelsensteinD (2007) Terror, fear and behaviour in the Jerusalem housing market. Urban Studies44(13): 2529–2546.
28.
KimS (2000) Urban development in the United States, 1690–1990. Southern Economic Journal66(4): 855–880.
29.
MurrayP (2006) Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives20(4): 111–132.
30.
PolèseMDenis-JacobJ (2010) Changes at the top: A cross-country examination over the 20th century of the rise (and fall) in rank of the top cities in national urban hierarchies. Urban Studies47(9): 1843–1860.
31.
RansomRL (1998) The economic consequences of the American Civil War. In: WolfsonM (ed.) The Political Economy of War and Peace. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
RothenbergT (1984) Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics. In: GrilichesZIntriligatorM (eds) Handbook of Econometrics 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 881–935.
34.
RousseeuwPLeroyA (1987) Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
35.
RousseeuwPVan ZomerenB (1990) Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. Journal of the American Statistical Association85: 633–639.
36.
SagemanM (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
SarganJD (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica26: 393–415.
38.
SavitchHV (2005) The anatomy of urban terror: Lessons from Jerusalem and elsewhere. Urban Studies42(3): 361–395.
39.
SavitchHV (2008) Cities in a Time of Terror: Space, Territory, and Local Resilience. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Ltd.
40.
StockJYogoM (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: AndrewsDStockJ (eds) Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–108.
41.
StockJWrightJYogoM (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics20(4): 518–529.
42.
WagenvoortRWaldmannR (2002) On B-robust instrumental variable estimation of the linear model with panel data. Journal of Econometrics106: 297–324.
