This paper underscores the centrality of individual technological devices, particularly mobile phones, in structuring contemporary social interaction in public spaces. It illustrates the need to re-think the relationship between information and communications technologies and practices of sociability in public spaces. Based on surveys of users of mobile phones (basic mobile phones and smartphones), we explore the practices and actions of subjects in public spaces. Empirical analysis shows that the use of mobile phones and, particularly, smartphones, is gradually modifying the normative constraints associated with place and social codes, simultaneously enhancing both a sense of freedom and estrangement. Based on our findings, the paper suggests the concept of portable private-personal territory to better understand the personal space individuals develop with the support of technology. Finally, the paper concludes with a reflection on the future implications of portable private-personal territories for public spaces and cities.
AminAThriftN (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity.
2.
BerryMHamiltonM (2010) Changing urban spaces: Mobile phones on trains. Mobilities5(1): 111–131.
3.
BoyerMC (1992) Cities for sale: Merchandising history at South Street Seaport. In: SorkinM (ed) Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 181–204.
4.
BrighentiAM (2010) The publicness of public space: On the public domain. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale49: 1828–1955.
5.
BrighentiAM (2012) New media and urban motilities: A territoriologic point of view. Urban Studies49(2): 399–414.
6.
CastellsM (1989) The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
7.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
CollinsD (2009) Private/public divide. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 437–441.
9.
CresswellT (2004) Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
de Souza e SilvaAFrithJ (2010) Locative mobile social networks: Mapping communication and location in urban spaces. Mobilities5(4): 485–505.
11.
de Souza e SilvaAFrithJ (2012) Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control, and Urban Sociability. New York: Routledge.
12.
DeyKAWacKFerreiraD. (2011) Getting closer: An empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smartphones. In: 13th ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing, Beijing, China, 17–23 September 2011, pp. 163–172. New York: ACM.
13.
GershunyJ (2003) Web use and net nerds: A neo functionalist analysis of the impact of information technology in the home. Social Forces82(1): 139–166.
14.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15.
GoffmanE (1963) Behavior in Public Spaces. New York: The Free Press.
16.
GoffmanE (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Pantheon.
17.
GrahamS (2002) Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarisation and information and communications technologies (ICTs). Urban Studies39(1): 33–56.
18.
GrahamS (2005) Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography29(5): 562–580.
19.
HamptonNK (2010) The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication60(4): 701–722.
20.
HananyC (2010) Observation in different typological spaces in the campus. Participant observation report, 27December.
21.
HaythornthwaiteCWellmanB (2002) Moving the internet out of cyberspace. In: WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (eds) The Internet and Everyday Life. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 3–44.
IvesonK (2007) Publics and the City. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
JensenOB (2009) Flows of meaning, cultures of movements: Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities4(1): 139–158.
25.
LoflandLH (1998) The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
26.
Loukaitou-SiderisAEhrenfeuchtR (2009) Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation Over Public Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
LowSSmithN (eds) (2005) The Politics of Public Space. New York: Routledge.
28.
LyonD (2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Automated Discrimination. New York: Routledge.
29.
MadanipourA (2003) Public and Private Spaces of the City. London and New York: Routledge.
30.
MadanipourA (ed) (2010) Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development. London and New York: Routledge.
31.
MallanK (2010) Navigating iScapes: Australian youth constructing identities and social relations in a network society. Anthropology & Education Quarterly41(3): 264–279.
32.
ManovichL (2001) The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. London: SAGE.
34.
MeekerM (2011) KPCB internet trends 2011. Report, Web 2.0 summit, San Francisco, CA, 18October.
35.
Mei-PoK (2007) Mobile communications, social networks, and urban travel: Hypertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction. The Professional Geographer59(4): 434–446.
36.
MillerK (2007) Designs on the Public: The Private Lives of New York’s Public Spaces. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
MitchellD (1995) The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers85: 108–133.
38.
MitchellJW (1999) E-topia: Urban Life, Jim – But Not As We Know It. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
PalenLDourishP (2003) Unpacking ‘privacy’ for a networked world. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Lauderdale, FL, 5–10 April 2003, pp. 129–136. New York: ACM.
40.
PfaffJ (2010) Mobile phone geographies. Geography Compass4(10): 1433–1447.
41.
PiconA (2008) Toward a city of events: Digital media and urbanity. New Geographies8: 32–43.
42.
RafaelLV (2003) The cell phone and the crowd: Messianic politics in the contemporary Philippines. Public Culture15(3): 399–425.
43.
RattiC (2006) Mobile landscapes: Using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33(5): 727–748.
44.
ReadesJ (2009) Eigenplaces: Analyzing cities using the space–time structure of the mobile phone network. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36(5): 824–836.
45.
SarjakoskiT (1998) Networked GIS for public participation – emphasis on utilizing image data computers. Environment and Urban Systems22(4): 381–392.
46.
SassenS (1998) The topoi of e-space: Global cities and global value chains. Built Environment24: 134–141.
47.
SennetR (1976) The Fall of the Public Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SharifulM (2010) Measuring people’s space–time accessibility to urban opportunities: An activity-based spatial search algorithm in a GIS. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development2(1–2): 107–120.
49.
ShellerM (2004) Mobile publics: Beyond the network perspective. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22: 39–52.
50.
StaeheliALMitchellD (2007) Locating the public in research and practice. Progress in Human Geography31: 792–811.
51.
ThriftN (2004a) Driving in the city. Theory, Culture and Society21: 41–59.
52.
ThriftN (2004b) Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 175–190.
53.
WacquantL (2007) Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven91: 66–77.
54.
WatsonS (2006) City Publics: The (Dis)enchantments of Urban Encounters. London: Routledge.
55.
WeintraubJ (1995) The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In: WeinbtraubJKumarJ (ed) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–42.
56.
YoungJ (1999) The Exclusive Society. London: SAGE.
57.
ZukinS (1995) The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
58.
ZureikE (2004) Governance, security and technology: The case of biometrics. Studies in Political Economy73: 113–137.
