Resilience is an increasingly important urban policy discourse that has been taken up at a rapid pace. Yet there is an apparent gap between the advocacy of social-ecological resilience in scientific literature and its take-up in policy discourse on the one hand, and the demonstrated capacity to govern for resilience in practice on the other. This paper explores this gap by developing a performative account of how social-ecological resilience is dealt with in practice through case study analysis of how protection of biodiversity was negotiated in response to Melbourne’s recent metropolitan planning initiative. It is suggested that a performative account expands the possible opportunities for governing for social-ecological resilience beyond the concept’s use as a metaphor, measurement, cognitive frame or programmatic statement of adaptive management/co-management and has the potential to emerge through what has been called the everyday ‘mangle of practice’ in response to social-ecological feedback inherent to policy processes.
AbramS.LienM. (2011) Performing nature at world’s ends, Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 76(1), pp. 3–18.
2.
AdlerE.PouliotV. (Eds) (2011) International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AG (Australian Government) (2010) Final prescription for Golden Sun Moth. Approved on 2010 by the Australian Government Minister for the Environment pursuant to the endorsed Program Delivering Melbourne’s Newest Sustainable Communities.
4.
AlexanderT. M. (1987) John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
AnsellC. K. (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
ArmitageD.BerkesF.DoubledayN. (Eds) (2007) Adaptive Co-management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-level Governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
7.
BarnesB. (2001) Practice as collective action, in: SchatzkiT. R.Knorr-CetinaK. D.von SavignyE. (Eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 17–29. London: Routledge.
8.
BeinerR. (1983) Political Judgement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BerkesF.ColdingJ.FolkeC. (Eds) (2003) Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BernsteinR. J. (2010) The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BiggsR.CarpenterS. R.BrockW. A. (2009) Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, pp. 826–831.
12.
BrandF. S.JaxK. (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object, Ecology and Society, 12, art. 23.
13.
CallonM. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay, in: LawJ. (Ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196–233London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14.
ČapekM. (1971) Bergson and Modern Physics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
15.
CarpenterS.WalkerB.AnderiesJ. M.AbelN. (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?, Ecosystems, 4, pp. 765–781.
16.
CashD. W.AdgerW. N.BerkesF.GardenP.. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world, Ecology and Society, 11, art. 8.
17.
CoA (Commonwealth of Australia) (2009) EPBC Act policy statement 3.12: significant impact guidelines for the critically endangered Golden Sun Moth (Synemon plana).
18.
CookS.D.N. (2008) Design and Responsibility: The Interdependence of Natural, Artificial, and Human Systems, in: VermaasP.E.KroesP.LightA.MooreS. A. (Eds) Philosophy and Design: from Engineering to Architecture, pp. 259–269. Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
19.
CookS. D. N.WagenaarH. (2012) Navigating the eternally unfolding present: toward an epistemology of practice, The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), pp. 3–38.
20.
DeweyJ. (1925/2008) Experience and Nature: Collected Works of John Dewey, The Later Works: 1925–1953, Vol. 1, ed. by BoydstonJ. A.La Salle, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
DeweyJ. (2006) Esays on Pragmatism and Truth 1907–1909: Collected Works of John Dewey, The Middle Works: 1899–1924, Vol. 4, ed. by BoydstonJ. A.La Salle, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
22.
DSE (Department of Sustainability and Environment) (2008) Native vegetation net gain accounting first approximation report. DSE, Victorian Government, Melbourne.
23.
DSE (2009) Delivering Melbourne’s newest sustainable communities: strategic impact assessment report for the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. DSE, Victorian Government, Melbourne.
24.
EvansJ. P. (2011) Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 223–237.
25.
FischerJ.PetersonG. D.GardnerT. A.GordonL. J.. (2009) Integrating social-ecological resilience and optimisation for conservation, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(10), pp. 549–554.
26.
FolkeC.ColdingJ.BerkesF. (2003) Synthesis: Building Resilience and Adaptive capacity in social-ecological Systems, in: BerkesF.ColdingJ.FolkeC. (Eds) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, pp. 352–387. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FolkeC. (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses, Global Environmental Change—Human and Policy Dimensions, 16, pp. 253–267.
28.
FolkeC.CarpenterS. R.WalkerB.SchefferM.. (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability, Ecology and Society, 15, art. 20.
29.
GundersonL. H.HollingC. S. (Eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
HackingI. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HildebrandD. L. (2003) Beyond Realism and Antirealism: John Dewey and the Neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
32.
HollingC. S. (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, pp. 1–23.
33.
HollingC. S. (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change, in: ClarkW. C.MunnR. E. (Eds) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, pp. 292–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HollingC. S.MeffeG. K. (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management, Conservation Biology, 10, pp. 328–337.
35.
HuitemaD.MostertE.EgasW.MoellenkampS.. (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda, Ecology and Society, 14, art. 26.
36.
JayM. (2005) Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
KirschM.BrewinD. (2011) Wyndham Planning Scheme Amendment C123: Truganina South Community Precinct Structure Plan: panel report with addendum. Planning Panels Victoria.
38.
LatourB. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
39.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LawJ. (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Milton Park: Routledge.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work, Organization Studies, 28, pp. 1435–1448.
43.
PickeringA. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
PickeringA.GuzikK. (Eds) (2008) The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society and Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45.
PickettS. T. A.CadenassoM. L.GroveJ. M. (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, pp. 369–384.
46.
SchönD. A.ReinM. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
47.
SnookS. A. (2002) Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Blackhawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TaylorC. (1995) Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
TurnbullD. (2012) Performativity and complex adaptive systems: working with multiple narratives across knowledge traditions, Studia UBB Philosophia, 57(1), pp. 9–32.
50.
VickersG. (1984) Human Systems Are Different. London: Paul Chapman Publishers.
51.
VossJ. P.BornemannB. (2011) The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management, Ecology and Society, 16, art. 9.
52.
WagenaarH. (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
53.
WagenaarH. (2012) Forum: dwellers on the threshold of practice: the interpretivism of Bevir and Rhodes, Critical Policy Studies, 6(1), pp. 86–100.
54.
WagenaarH.CookS. D. N. (2003) Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis, in: HajerM.WagenaarH. (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, pp. 139–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
WagenaarH.CookS. D. N. (2012) The push and pull of the world: how experience animates practice, Evidence and Policy, 7(2), pp. 193–212.
56.
WhittingtonR. (2006) Completing the practice turn in strategy research, Organization Studies, 27, pp. 613–634.
57.
WilkinsonC. (2012a) Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory, Planning Theory, 11(2), pp. 148–169.
58.
WilkinsonC. (2012b) Urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice?, Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), pp. 319–324.
59.
WilkinsonC.PorterL.ColdingJ. (2010) Metropolitan planning and resilience thinking: a practitioner’s perspective, Critical Planning, 17, pp. 25–44.
