The development of functional economic areas and their relationship to governance has been attracting considerable attention. New forms of sub-regional governance have emerged that have been interpreted in a variety of ways. Within this context, a different approach to multiscalar governance linked to economic space is emerging at a European level in relation to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty. This is embedding the principles of subsidiarity/territorial cohesion within member-states, and with sub-state scales of working being promulgated. This paper adds to existing discussions of city-regionalism by providing an alternative—yet fundamental—insight into these reform constructs within England in its relations with the EU. It explores: the role of economic spaces in the genealogy of rescaling tendencies; their co-option of governance as a ‘strategic’ mechanism for growth; and the emergent geo-politics associated with new sub-state governance structures and their effectiveness as intended ‘transitionary’ arrangements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlesinaA.SpolaoreE. (2003) The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AmdamR. (2004) Spatial planning as a regional legitimating process, European Journal of Spatial Development, 11, pp. 1–22.
3.
AshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH. (2002) The Empire Writes Back, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
4.
BakerA. (2012) The ‘public interest’ agency of international organizations? The case of the OECD and corporate governance, Review of International Political Economy, 19, pp. 389–414.
5.
BanninkD.OssewaardeR. (2012) Decentralization: new modes of governance and administrative responsibility, Administration and Society, 44, pp. 595–624.
6.
BarcaF. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. Brussels: CEC.
7.
BentleyG.BaileyD.ShuttJ. (2010) From RDAs to LEPs: a new localism? Case examples of West Midlands and Yorkshire, Local Economy, 25, pp. 535–557.
8.
BevirM. (2010) Democratic Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BoothP. (2009) Planning and the culture of governance: local institutions and reform in France, European Planning Studies, 17, pp. 677–695.
10.
BorzelT.RisseT. (2012) When Europeanisation meets diffusion: exploring new territory, West European Politics, 35, pp. 192–207.
11.
BrennerN. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BrennerN. (2009a) Restructuring, rescaling and the urban question, Critical Planning, 16(Summer), pp. 61–79.
13.
BrennerN. (2009b) Open questions on state rescaling, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2, pp. 123–139.
14.
BulmerS.BurchM. (2009) The Europeanisation of Whitehall UK Central Government and the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
15.
ButcherL. (2012) Local transport governance and finance 2010. House of Commons Standard Note SN 5735, London.
16.
CamagniR.CapelloR. (2012) Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: a conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union, Regional Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.681640.
17.
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1991) Europe 2000. CEC, Brussels.
18.
CEC (1995) Europe 2000+. CEC, Brussels.
19.
CEC (1999) European spatial development perspective (ESDP): towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. CEC, Luxembourg.
CEC (2011a) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. CEC, Brussels.
23.
CEC (2011b) Commission lays foundations to boost impact of cohesion investment after 2013. Press notice, 6October, CEC, Brussels.
24.
CEC (2012a) Cohesion policy 2-14-2020: investing in growth and jobs. CEC, Brussels.
25.
CEC (2012b) Amended proposal for a regulation COM 12 (496) final 11. CEC, Brussels.
26.
CharbitC. (2011) Governance of public policies in decentralised contexts the multi-level approach. Regional Development Working Paper No. 2011/04, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
27.
CheshireP.MagriniS. (2009) Urban growth drivers in a Europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries, Journal of Economic Geography, 9, pp. 85–115.
28.
ChorianopoulosI. (2012) State spatial restructuring in Greece: forced rescaling, unresponsive localities, European Urban and Regional Studies, 19, pp. 331–348.
29.
ClaytonN.MandairR. (2012) Cities Outlook 1901. Centre for Cities, London.
30.
DBIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills) (2012) Partnership agreement: delivery of structural funds, rural development funds and maritime and fisheries funds in England: government response to the informal consultation. DBIS, London.
31.
DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) (2008) Planning and optimal geographical economic decision making: the sub-regional role. DCLG, London.
DCLG (2011) Community budgets prospectus. DCLG, London.
34.
DeasI.GiordanoB. (2003) Regions, city-regions, identity and institution-building: contemporary experiences of the ‘scalar turn’ in Italy and England, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, pp. 225–246.
35.
DeasI.LordA. (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state, Urban Studies, 43, pp. 1847–1877.
36.
DinanD. (2010) Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, 4th edn.Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers.
37.
DuhrS.ColombC.NadinV. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. Abingdon: Routledge.
38.
EversD.TennekenJ.BorsboomJ.van der HeiligenbergH.TissenM. (2009) A Territorial impact assessment for territorial cohesion for The Netherlands. Netherland Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
39.
FaludiA. (2011) Cohesion, Coherence, Co-operation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age?Abingdon: Routledge.
40.
GoetzK.Meyer-SahlingJ.-H. (2009) Political time in the EU: dimensions, perspectives, theories, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, pp. 180–201.
41.
HallsworthM. (2011) System stewardship: the future of policy making?Institute for Government, London.
42.
HamiduddinI.GallentN. (2012) Limits to growth: the challenge of housing delivery in England’s ‘under-bounded’ districts, Planning Practice and Research, 27, pp. 513–530.
43.
HardingA.HarloeM.ReesJ. (2010) Manchester’s bust regime?, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, pp. 981–991.
44.
HarrisonJ. (2011) Local enterprise partnerships. Report for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS). Loughborough University.
45.
HarrisonJ. (2012) In what sense a new non-state space? Globalization, the politics of rescaling, and the new politics of city-regionalism. Paper presented at the 2012 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, July.
46.
HaughtonG.AllmendingerP.VigarG.CounsellD. (2010) The New Spatial Planning. Abingdon: Routledge.
47.
HazellR. (2004) The unfinished business of devolution, in: TrenchA. (Ed.) Has Devolution Made a Difference? The State of the Nations, pp. 255–276. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
48.
HeritierA. (2001) New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy Making without Legislating?Vienna: Renner Institute.
49.
HeseltineM. (2012) No stone unturned in pursuit of growth. Lord Heseltine Review, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London
50.
HeseltineM. (2013) Oral evidence on Lord Heseltine’s Report: ‘No stone unturned in pursuit of growth’. Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence, Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, HC 823-ii, 12FebruaryHouse of Commons, London.
51.
HM Government (2011) Unlocking growth in cities. HM Government, London.
52.
HM Treasury (2007) Sub-national review of economic development and regeneration. HM Treasury, London.
53.
HM Treasury and Cabinet Office (2004) Devolving decision-making: 1—delivering better public services: setting targets and performance management. HM Treasury, London.
54.
JessopB. (1997) A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes, in: LauriaM. (Ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 51–73. London: Sage.
55.
JessopB. (2001) Institutional (re)turns and the strategic-relational approach, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1213–1237.
56.
JessopB.SumN. L. (2006) Beyond the Regulation Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
57.
JonasA. E. G. (2012) City-regionalism: questions on distribution and politics, Progress in Human Geography, 36, pp. 822–829.
58.
JordanA. (2004) The United Kingdom: from policy ‘taking’ to policy ‘shaping’, in: JordanA.LiefferinkD. (Eds) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, pp. 205–223. Abingdon: Routledge.
59.
KeatingM. (2012) Rethinking territorial autonomy, in: GargnonA.-G.KeatingM. (Eds) Political Autonomy and Divided Societies, pp. 13–31. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
KrugmanP. (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 483–499.
61.
LascoumesP.Le GalesP. (2007) Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation, Governance, 20(1), pp. 1–22.
62.
LyonsM. (2007) A shared ambition for the future of local government. DCLG, London.
63.
MargettsH.Perri6HoodC. (Eds) (2012) Paradoxes of Modernization: Unintended Consequences of Public Policy Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
MendezC. (2012) The post-2013 reform of EU cohesion policy and the place-based narrative, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), pp. 639–659.
65.
MontiM. (2010) A new strategy for the single market at the service of Europe’s economy and society. CEC, Brussels, 9May.
66.
MorphetJ. (2013) How Europe Shapes British Public Policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
67.
MorrisI. (2010) Why the West Rules—For Now: The Patterns of History and What They Reveal about the Future. London: Profile.
68.
NeumayerE.PlumperT. (2012) Conditional spatial policy dependence: theory and model specification, Comparative Political Studies, 45, pp. 819–849.
69.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006) Competitive Cities in the Global Economy. Paris: OECD.
70.
O’RiordanT.RowbothamE. J. (1996) Struggling for credibility: the United Kingdom’s response, in: O’RiordanT.JagerJ. (Eds) (1996b) Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective, pp. 228–267. Abingdon: Routledge.
71.
PaasiA. (2012) Regional complexity, governance and the region: problematizing ‘bounded regions’. Paper presented at the 2011 Regional Studies Annual Winter Conference: Contested Regions: Territorial Politics and Policy. London, November.
72.
PaasiA.JonesM. (2012) Regional world(s): advancing the geography of regions, Regional Studies, 47(1), pp. 29–42.
73.
PageE. C. (2010) Has the Whitehall model survived?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, pp. 407–423.
74.
ParkinsonM. (2006) State of the cities: core cities report. Core Cities Group, Manchester.
75.
PembertonS.LloydM. G. (2011) Facilitating institutional reform in England: reconciling city-region and community planning for efficiency gains, European Planning Studies, 19, pp. 501–517.
76.
PembertonS.MorphetJ. (2012) Libertarian paternalism as a tool to explore strategic sub-regional planning in England?, European Planning Studies, DOI:10.1080/09654313.2012.722971.
77.
PetersonJ. (1994) Subsidiarity: a definition to suit any vision?, Parliamentary Affairs, 47, pp. 116–132.
78.
PhelpsN. A.WoodA. (2011) The new post-suburban politics?, Urban Studies, 48, pp. 2591–2610.
79.
PugalisL.ShuttJ.BentleyG. (2012) Local Enterprise Partnerships: living up to the hype?Institute of Economic Development, London.
80.
PykettJ.JonesR.WhiteheadM.HuxleyM.. (2011) Interventions in the political geography of libertarian paternalism, Political Geography, 30, pp. 301–310.
81.
RhinardM. (2010) Framing Europe: Shaping Strategies of the European Commission. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
SaletW.ThornleyA. (2007) Institutional influences on the integration of multilevel governance and spatial policy in European city-regions, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, pp. 188–206.
84.
SchimmelfennigF.SedermeierU. (2004) Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 11, pp. 661–679.
85.
ScottA. (2001) Global City Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86.
SehestedK. (2009) Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors, Planning Theory and Practice, 10, pp. 245–263.
87.
StuartG. (2013) Corrected oral evidence on European scrutiny in the House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee HC 711-vi, House of Commons, London, 13February.
88.
TrenchA. (2007) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
89.
WardK.McCannE. (2011) Conclusion, in: McCannE.WardK. (Eds) Mobile Urbanism: City Policymaking in the Global Age, pp. 147–184. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
90.
ZonneveldW.WaterhoutB. (2009) EU territorial impact assessment: under what conditions? Final report. OTB Research Institute, Delft.
