Science parks (SPs) have received special attention as a policy tool to facilitate localised economic growth by attracting high-tech firms, especially small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The effectiveness of this strategy has been called into question. Empirical studies suggest that the benefits of SPs for high-tech firms are limited. While this debate is mainly concentrated in the US and Europe, this paper sheds light on the role of SPs in China. It is found that, despite the presence of alternatives, the locations of high-tech SMEs in the region of Shenzhen are determined by hierarchically structured and governed SPs. This finding supports the notion that SPs can play a positive role in attracting high-tech SMEs. Moreover, these effects occur in the relatively unexplored Chinese context of increasingly liberalised but governed market circumstances, where a mature innovation system is still lacking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AghionP.HowittP. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica, 60(2), pp. 323–351.
2.
AnttiroikoA. V. (2009) Making of an Asia–Pacific high-technology hub: reflections on the large-scale business site development projects of the Osaka city and the Osaka prefecture, Regional Studies, 43(5), pp. 759–769.
3.
AudretschB. (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), pp. 18–29.
4.
AvnimelechG.SchwartzD.Bar-ElR. (2007) Entrepreneurial high-tech cluster development: Israel’s experience with venture capital and technological incubators, European Planning Studies, 15(9), pp. 1181–1198.
5.
BatheltH.MalmbergA.MaskellP. (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp. 31–56.
6.
BurgerM.OortF. vanLindersG. J. (2009) On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation, Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2), pp. 167–190.
7.
CaoC. (2004) Zhongguancun and China’s high-tech parks in transition: ‘Growing pains’ or ‘premature senility’?, Asian Survey, 44(5), pp. 647–668.
8.
CastellsM.HallP. (1994) Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first-century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
9.
ChanK.-Y. A.OerlemansL. A. G.PretoriusM. W. (2010) Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: the innovation hub case, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), pp. 207–228.
10.
ChenH. (2009) Development and spatial distribution of high-tech parks in China, Economic Geography, 29(11), pp. 1762–1769.
11.
ChinitzB. (1961) Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh, American Economic Review, 51, pp. 279–289.
12.
ColomboM. G.DelmastroM. (2002) How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, 31(7), pp. 1103–1122.
13.
DierdonckR. vanDebackereK.RappaM. A. (1991) An assessment of science parks: towards a better understanding of their role in the diffusion of technological knowledge, R&D Management, 21(2), pp. 109–124.
14.
DoringT.SchnellenbachJ. (2006) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature, Regional Studies, 40(3), pp. 375–395.
15.
EnrightM. (1994) Organisation and coordination in geographically concentrated industries, in: RaffD.LamoreauxN. (Eds) Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise. Chicago, IL: Universoty of Chicago Press.
16.
EnrightM.ScottE.ChangK. (2005) Regional Powerhouse: The Greater Pearl River Delta and the Rise of China. Singapore: Wiley.
17.
FangC.XieY. (2008) Site planning and guiding principles of hi-tech parks in China: Shenzhen as a case study, Environment and Planning B, 35(1), pp. 100–121.
18.
FeldmanM. P.FloridaR. (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), pp. 210–229.
19.
FelsensteinD. (1994) University-related science parks: ‘seedbeds’ or ‘enclaves’ of innovation?, Technovation, 14(2), pp. 93–110.
20.
FergusonR.OlofssonC. (2004) Science parks and the development of NTBFs: location, survival and growth, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), pp. 5–17.
21.
GarnseyE.HeffernanP. (2005) High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: the Cambridge case, Regional Studies, 39(8), pp. 1127–1144.
22.
GrinsteinA.GoldmanA. (2006) Characterizing the technology firm: an exploratory study, Research Policy, 35(1), pp. 121–143.
23.
GuC.ChenG. (2001) Expanding the industrial horizon in Shenzhen: globalization, industrial restructuring and transformation, Economic Geography, 21(3), pp. 261–265.
24.
Guangdong Provincial Government (1992) Provisions for implementing policies for high-tech parks in Guangdong Province. Guangzhou.
25.
HaninkD. M.EbensteinA. Y.CromleyR. G. (2011) Spatial analysis of selected manufacturing and service sectors in China’s economy using county employment data for 1990 and 2000, Regional Studies, 45(3), pp. 351–369.
26.
HaoP.GeertmanS.HooimeijerP.SliuzasR. (2012) The land-use diversity of urban villages in Shenzen, Environment and Planning A, 44(11), pp. 2742–2764.
27.
HeC.WeiY.PanF. (2007) Geographical concentration of manufacturing industries in China: the importance of spatial and industrial scales, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 48(5), pp. 603–625.
28.
HuangK. F.YuC. M. J.SeetooD. H. (2012) Firm innovation in policy-driven parks and spontaneous clusters: the smaller firm the better?, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), pp. 715–731.
29.
JacobsJ. (1969) The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.
30.
KrugmanP. R. (1991) Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
LeungC. K. (1993) Personal contacts, subcontracting linkages, and development in the Hong Kong–Zhujiang delta region, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(2), pp. 272–302.
32.
LeungC. K.WuC. T. (1995) Innovation environment, R&D linkages and technology development in Hong Kong, Regional Studies, 29(6), pp. 533–546.
33.
LindenG.KraemerK. L.DedrickJ. (2009) Who captures value in a global innovation network? The case of Apple’s iPod, Communications of the ACM, 52(3), pp. 140–144.
34.
LoC. (1987) Socialist ideology and urban strategies in China, Urban Geography, 8(5), pp. 440–458.
35.
LofstenH.LindelofP. (2002) Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: academic–industry links, innovation and markets, Research Policy, 31(6), pp. 859–876.
36.
MalmbergA. (1997) Industrial geography: location and learning, Progress in Human Geography, 21(4), pp. 573–582.
37.
MasseyD.WieldD. (1992) Science parks: a concept in science, society, and space, Environment and Planning D, 10(4), pp. 411–422.
38.
McGeeT. G. (1991) The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis, in GinsbergN.KoppelB.McGeeT.G. (Eds) The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, pp. 3–25. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
NgM. K. (2003) Shenzhen, Cities, 20(6), pp. 429–441.
41.
PhanP. H.SiegelD. S.WrightM. (2005) Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), pp. 165–182.
42.
PhillipsS. A. M.YeungH. W. C. (2003) A place for R&D? The Singapore science park, Urban Studies, 40(4), pp. 707–732.
43.
PondsR.OortF. vanFrenkenK. (2010) Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), pp. 231–255.
44.
RamaR.FergusonD.MeleroA. (2003) Subcontracting networks in industrial districts: the electronics industries of Madrid, Regional Studies, 37(1), pp. 71–88.
45.
ScottA. J. (1988) New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.
46.
Shenzhen Bureau of Trade and Industry (2001) Guidance on transforming traditional industries with high-tech or advanced applicable technologies. Shenzhen.
47.
Shenzhen Bureau of Trade and Industry (2003) Specific measures to facilitate green pass services to large enterprises. Shenzhen.
Shenzhen Municipality (1996) Measures to support the reform and development of selective large enterprises. Shenzhen.
50.
Shenzhen Planning Bureau (2006) Transformation and evolution: Shenzhen 2010. Shenzhen.
51.
Shenzhen Planning Bureau (2009) Shenzhen high-tech park development plan 2009–2015. Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen.
52.
Shenzhen Statistics Bureau (2008) Shenzhen Statistical Yearbook 2008. Shenzhen: Statistics Bureau Press.
53.
SiegelD. S.WestheadP.WrightM. (2003) Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research, Small Business Economics, 20(2), pp. 177–184.
54.
SoestD. P. vanGerkingS.van OortF. G. (2006) Spatial impacts of agglomeration externalities, Journal of Regional Science, 46(5), pp. 881–899.
55.
State Administration of Taxation (1991) Provisions on the tax policy of the national-level high-tech parks. Beijing.
56.
State Scientific and Technological Commission (1991) Interim provisions on the policies of national-level high-tech parks. Beijing.
57.
State Statistics Bureau (1999) China Statistical Yearbook 1998. Beijing: Statistics Bureau Press.
58.
SternbergR.TamásyC. (1999) Munich as Germany’s no. 1 high technology region: empirical evidence, theoretical explanations and the role of small firm/large firm relationships, Regional Studies, 33(4), pp. 367–377.
59.
StoreyD. J.TetherB. S. (1998) Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union, Research Policy, 26(9), pp. 1037–1057.
60.
SunY. F. (2002) Sources of innovation in China’s manufacturing sector: imported or developed in-house?, Environment and Planning A, 34(6), pp. 1059–1072.
61.
VargaA.PontikakisD.ChorafakisG. (2012) Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity, Journal of Economic Geography, DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbs041.
62.
Viladecans-MarsalE. (2004) Agglomeration economies and industrial location: city-level evidence, Journal of Economic Geography, 4(5), pp. 565–582.
63.
WalcottS. (2002) Chinese industrial and science parks: bridging the gap, The Professional Geographer, 54(3), pp. 349–364.
64.
WestheadP. (1997) R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology-based firms located on and off science parks, R&D Management, 27(1), pp. 45–62.
65.
WestheadP.BatstoneS. (1998) Independent technology-based firms: the perceived benefits of a science park location, Urban Studies, 35(12), pp. 2197–2219.
66.
WestheadP.StoreyD. J. (1995) Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 23(4), pp. 345–360.
67.
WestheadP.BatstoneS.MartinF. (2000) Technology-based firms located on science parks: the applicability of Bullock’s ‘soft-hard’ model, Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(2), pp. 107–139.
68.
WuF. (2010) How neoliberal is China’s reform? The origins of change during transition, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 51(5), pp. 619–631.
69.
YiH.YangF. F.YehA. G. O. (2011) Intraurban location of producer services in Guangzhou, China, Environment and Planning A, 43(1), pp. 28–47.
70.
ZhangJ. X.WuF. L. (2006) China’s changing economic governance: administrative annexation and the reorganization of local governments in the Yangtze River delta, Regional Studies, 40(1), pp. 3–21.
71.
ZhouY.XinT. (2003) An innovative region in China: interaction between multinational corporations and local firms in a high-tech cluster in Beijing, Economic Geography, 79(2), pp. 129–152.
72.
ZhuJ. (1996) Denationalization of urban physical development: the experiment in the Shenzhen special economic zone, China, Cities, 13(3), pp. 187–194.
