The concept of assemblages has gained an important degree of momentum in urban studies claiming to offer a new ontology for understanding cities as emergent and fluid concatenations of multiple elements. Such a conception, however, has also been criticised in relation to its supposed failure to deal effectively with the issue of power and inequality in urban dynamics. This paper contributes to this on-going discussion by exploring in detail the way in which power was embedded in one particular case: a bus stop shelter located in front of the Biblioteca Nacional in Santiago, Chile. In so doing, it analyses the controversy arising when two large and complex urban assemblages share component/s that each of them claims as exclusive. This situation made necessary practices of co-ordination in which a hierarchy was established between the competing assemblages, involving important transformations in some of its components.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ. (2011) Powerful assemblages?, Area, 43(2), pp. 154–157.
2.
AndersonB.McFarlaneC. (2011) Assemblage and geography, Area, 43(2), pp. 124–127.
3.
BennettJ. (2005) The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout, Public Culture, 17(3), pp. 445–466.
4.
BrennerN.MaddenD.WachsmuthD. (2011) Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory, City, 15(2), pp. 225–240.
5.
CorreaG.AbedrapoE.GonzálezS.SolísS. (2000) Plan de transporte urbano de Santiago 2000–2010. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transporte y Telecomunicaciones, Santiago.
6.
De LandaM. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
7.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
8.
DewsburyJ.-D. (2011) The Deleuze–Guattarian assemblage: plastic habits, Area, 43(2), pp. 148–153.
9.
DührS. (2007) The Visual Language of Spatial Planning: Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning. London: Routledge.
10.
FariasI. (2009) Introduction: decentring the object of urban studies, in: FaríasI.BenderT. (Eds) Urban Assemblages: How Actor–Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, pp. 1–24. London: Routledge.
11.
FariasI. (2011) The politics of urban assemblages, City, 15(3/4), pp. 365–374.
12.
FariasI.BenderT. (Eds) (2009) Urban Assemblages: How Actor–Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.
13.
GrossP. (1991) Santiago de Chile (1925–1990): Planificación Urbana y Modelos Politicos, EURE, 17(52/53), pp. 27–52.
14.
HarrisonP. (2011) Fletum: a prayer for X, Area, 43(2), pp. 158–161.
15.
HommelsA. (2005) Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
de LaetM.MolA. (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: mechanics of a fluid technology, Social Studies of Science, 30(2), pp. 225–263.
17.
LatourB. (1990) Drawing things together, in: LynchM.WoolgarS. (Eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 18–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
LawJ.MolA. (2001) Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities, Environment and Planning D, 19, pp. 609–621.
19.
LepawskyJ. (2005) Stories of space and subjectivity in planning the Multimedia Super Corridor, Geoforum, 36(6), pp. 705–719.
20.
LynchM. (1985) Discipline and the material form of images: an analysis of scientific visibility, Social Studies of Science, 15(1), pp. 37–66.
21.
MailletA. (2008) La gestación del Transantiago en el discurso público: hacia un análisis de políticas públicas desde la perspectiva cognitivista, in: de CeaM.DiazP.KerneurG. (Eds) Chile de país modelado a país modelo: Una mirada sobre la política, lo social y la economía. Santiago: LOM.
22.
MarcusG.SakaE. (2006) Assemblage, Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2/3), pp. 101–106.
23.
McFarlaneC. (2011a) The city as assemblage: dwelling and urban space, Environment and Planning D, 29(4), pp. 649–671.
24.
McFarlaneC. (2011b) Assemblage and critical urbanism, City, 15(2), pp. 204–224.
25.
MolA. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
MOPTT (Ministerio de Obras Públicas Transportes y Telecomunicaciones) (2003) Bases de Consultoría: Diseño de Estaciones de Transbordo para Transantiago. Coordinación General de Concesiones, MOPTT, Santiago.
27.
MuñozJ. C.GschwenderA. (2008) Transantiago: a tale of two cities, Research in Transportation Economics, 22, pp. 45–53.
28.
OngA.CollierS. J. (Eds) (2008) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
SayerA. (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
30.
SECTRA (Secretaría de Planificación de Transporte) (2000) Resumen Ejecutivo del Plan de Transporte Urbano de Santiago, 2000–2006. Subsecretaria Interministerial de Transportes, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago.
31.
SilvaP. (2008) In the Name of Reason, Technocrats and Politics in Chile. University Park, PE: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
32.
SöderströmO. (1996) Paper cities: visual thinking in urban planning, Cultural Geographies, 3(3), pp. 249–281.
33.
WachsmuthD.MaddenD.BrennerN. (2011) Between abstraction and complexity: meta-theoretical observations on the assemblage debate, City, 15(6), pp. 740–750.
