Most Dutch cities have adopted urban restructuring policies aimed at creating a socially mixed population in deprived neighbourhoods. This entails the demolition of low-cost, social rented housing units, which leads to the displacement of their residents. While researchers have investigated the social effects of displacement on adults, this study is the first to provide insight into the effects on youths. The findings indicate that, although the first months after displacement youths lose some social contacts and stop participating in certain leisure activities, they show high levels of flexibility and soon make new friends and take up leisure activities in their new neighbourhood. No differences were found in friendships and leisure activities between displaced youths and those in a control group of non-displaced youths as reported at the time of the study. This confirms that in the long term the effects of displacement are limited.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanG. (1989) Insiders and outsiders: boundaries around the home, in: AllanG.CrowG. (Eds) Home and Family: Creating the Domestic, pp. 141–158. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
2.
AnsellN. (2009) Childhood and the politics of scale: descaling children’s geographies?, Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), pp. 190–209.
3.
BaronR. A.ByrneD. (1994) Social Psychology: Understanding Human Interaction, 7th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BoltG.KempenR. vanHamM. van (2008) Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy, Urban Studies, 45(7), pp. 1359–1384.
5.
BriggsX. de Souza (1998) Brown kids in white suburbs: housing mobility and the many faces of social capital, Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), pp. 177–221.
6.
BrooksF.ZugazagaC.WolkJ.AdamsM. A. (2005) Resident perceptions of housing, neighbourhood, and economic conditions after relocation from public housing undergoing HOPE VI redevelopment, Research on Social Work Practice, 15(6), pp. 481–490.
7.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J.AberJ. L. (Eds) (1997) Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children, Vol. 1. New York: Russell Sage.
8.
BrownB. B. (2004) Adolescents’ relationships with peers, in: LernerR.SteinbergL. (Eds) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2nd edn, pp. 363–394. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
BushinN. (2009) Researching family migration decision-making: a children-in-family approach, Population, Space and Place, 15(5), pp. 429–443.
10.
ChaskinR. J.BakerS. (2006) Negotiating among opportunity and constraint: the participation of young people in out-of-school-time activities. Working paper, Chapin Hall, University of Chicago.
11.
Clampet-LundquistS. (2004) HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighbourhoods and building new ties, Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), pp. 415–448.
12.
Clampet-LundquistS. (2007) No more ‘Bois Ball’: the effect of relocation from public housing on adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), pp. 298–323.
13.
CopeM. (2008) Patchwork neighborhood: children’s real and imagined geographies in Buffalo, NY, Environment and Planning, A, 40, pp. 2845–2863.
14.
CrosnoeR. (2000) Friendships in childhood and adolescence: the life course and new directions, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), pp. 377–391.
15.
DeLucaS.DuncanG. J.KeelsM.MendenhallR. (2012) The notable and the null: using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs, in: van HamM.ManleyD.BaileyN.SimpsonL.MaclennanD. (Eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, pp. 195–224. Dordrecht: Springer.
16.
DoffW.KleinhansR. (2011) Residential outcomes of forced relocation: lifting a corner of the veil on neighbourhood selection, Urban Studies, 48(4), pp. 661–680.
17.
Du Bois-ReymondM.Te PoelY.RaveslootJ. (1998) Jongeren en hun Keuzes [Youth and their choices]. Bussum: Coutinho.
18.
EijkG. van (2010) Unequal Networks: Spatial Segregation, Relationships and Inequality in the City. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
19.
EvansK. (2010) Taking control of their lives? Agency in young adult transitions in England and the new Germany, Journal of Youth Studies, 5(3), pp. 245–269.
20.
FeldS. L. (1981) The focused organization of social ties, American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), pp. 1015–1035.
21.
FeldS. L.CarterW. C. (1998) Foci of activity as changing contexts for friendship, in: AdamsR. G.AllanG. (Eds) Placing Friendship in Context, pp. 136–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GallagherM.BajajB. (2007) Moving on: benefits and challenges of HOPE VI for children. June Brief No. 4, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
23.
GalsterG.AnderssonR.MusterdS. (2010) Who is affected by neighbourhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences, Urban Studies, 47(14), pp. 2915–2944.
24.
GoffmanE. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
25.
GottmanJ. M.ParkerJ. G. (1986) Conversations of Friends: Speculations on Affective Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GuestA. M.WierzbickiS. K. (1999) Social ties at the neighborhood level: two decades of GSS evidence, Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), pp. 92–111.
27.
HartupW.AbecassisM. (2002) Friends and enemies, in: SmithP.HartC. (Eds) Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development, pp. 286–306. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
28.
HeringaA.BoltG.DijstM. (2012) Time–space dimensions of shaping segregated social networks: Turks and native Dutch in two neighbourhoods in Rotterdam. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, Delft, May.
29.
HuckfeldtR. R. (1983) Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: environmental constraints on friendship choice, American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), pp. 651–659.
30.
HuttenmoserM. (1995) Children and their living surroundings: empirical investigations into the significance of living surroundings for the everyday life and development of children, Children’s Environments, 12(4), pp. 403–413.
31.
JosephM.ChaskinR. (2010) Living in a mixed-income development: resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago, Urban Studies, 47(11), pp. 2347–2366.
32.
KarstenL. (1998) Growing up in Amsterdam: differentiation and segregation in children’s daily lives, Urban Studies, 35(3), pp. 565–581.
33.
KarstenL. (2003) Children’s use of public space: the gendered world of the playground, Childhood, 10(4), pp. 457–473.
34.
KempenR. van (2010) From the residence to the global: the relevance of the urban neighbourhood in an era of globalization and mobility. Paper presented at the European Network for Housing Research Conference ‘Urban Dynamics and Housing Change’, Istanbul, July.
35.
MacDonaldR.ShildrickT. (2007) Street corner society: leisure careers, youth (sub)culture and social exclusion, Leisure Studies, 26(3), pp. 339–355.
36.
MastrigtS. B. vanCarringtonP. J. (2013) Sex and age homophily in co-offending networks: opportunity or preference?, in: MorselliC. (Ed.) Crime and Networks. New York: Routledge (forthcoming).
37.
MatthewsH.LimbM. (1999) Defining an agenda for the geography of children: review and prospect, Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), pp. 61–90.
38.
MilesS. (2000) Youth Lifestyles in a Changing World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
39.
Municipality of Utrecht (2009) Uitvoeringsnotitie Jongeren en Vrije Tijd.
40.
Municipality of Utrecht (2010a) Utrecht Monitor 2010.
41.
Municipality of Utrecht (2010b) Rapportage WoOn 2009: Een analyse van Utrechtse woningmarktgegevens.
42.
PettitB. (2004) Moving and children’s social connections: neighborhood context and the consequences of moving for low-income families, Sociological Forum, 19(2), pp. 285–311.
43.
PopkinS. J.LevyD. K.HarrisL. E.ComeyJ.CunninghamM. K. (2004) The HOPE VI program: what about the residents?, Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), pp. 385–413.
44.
PosthumusH.BoltG.KempenR. van (2010) The effects of forced relocations on improvements of the housing situation: a case study in four Dutch cities. Paper presented at the OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment Conference ‘Neighbourhood Restructuring and Resident Relocation’, Delft, November.
45.
PreciadoP.SnijdersT. A. B.BurkW. J.StattinH.KerrM. (2012) Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships, Social Networks, 34, pp. 18–31.
46.
RankinB. H.QuaneJ. M. (2002) Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: the interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth, Social Problems, 49(1), pp. 79–100.
47.
RuddP. W.EvansK. (1998) Structure and agency in youth transitions: student experiences of vocational further education, Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), pp. 39–62.
48.
SmallM. L.FeldmanJ. (2012) Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neighbourhood effects after moving to opportunity, in: van HamM.ManleyD.BaileyN.SimpsonL.MaclennanD. (Eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, pp. 57–77. Dordrecht: Springer.
49.
Statistics Netherlands (2012) Personenautobezit van Huishoudens en Personen [Passenger car ownership of households and persons], Sociaaleconomische Trends, 2012-1, pp. 34–46.
50.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994) Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: a longitudinal test of interactional theory, Criminology, 32(1), pp. 47–83.
51.
UitermarkJ. (2003) ‘Social mixing’ and the management of disadvantaged neighbourhoods: the Dutch policy of urban restructuring revisited, Urban Studies, 40(3), pp. 531–549.
52.
ValentineG. (1997) ‘Oh yes I can’. ‘Oh no you can’t’. Children and parent’s understanding of kids’ competence to negotiate public space safely, Antipode, 29(1), pp. 65–89.
53.
VaradyD. P.WalkerC. C.WangX. (2001) Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the US: do moving distance and relocation services matter?, Urban Studies, 38(8), pp. 1273–1304.
54.
VisserK.BoltG.KempenR. van (2013) Urban restructuring and forced relocations: housing opportunities for youth? A case study in Utrecht, the Netherlands, Housing Studies, 28(2), pp. 294–316.
55.
VJI (Verwey Jonker Instituut) (2008) Kinderen in Tel, Kinderrechten als Basis voor Lokaal Jeugdbeleid [Kids count: children’s right as a basis for local youth policy]. Databoek 2008, VJI, Utrecht.
