Intergenerational support between parents and children in Chinese cities has been dramatically affected by recent social changes. This paper investigates the changing pattern of intergenerational housing support between retired old parents and their children, and the legacy of public housing in shaping this pattern. By initially establishing an up-to-date picture of intergenerational housing support between retired old parents and their children, it seeks to determine how this support depends on whether parents have previously been allocated public housing and, if so, on whether they have disposed of it or have continued to occupy it. A survey with 1000 retired old people from Tianjin in 2009 is used for the analysis. A support flow model is used to go beyond studying housing support per se, and to study the flow of intergenerational support in both directions and in different forms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Attias-DonfutC.OggJ.WolffF. C. (2005) European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers, European Journal of Ageing, 2, pp. 161–173.
2.
CaldwellJ. C. (1976) Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory, Population and Development Review, 2, pp. 321–366.
3.
CaldwellJ. C. (2005) On net intergenerational wealth flows: an update, Population and Development Review, 31(4), pp. 721–740.
4.
EngelhardtG. V.MayerC. J. (1998) Intergenerational transfers, borrowing constraints, and saving behavior: evidence from the housing market, Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 135–157.
5.
FengW.MasonA. (2007) Population aging in China: challenges, opportunities, and institutions, in: ZhaoZ.GuoF. (Eds) Transition and Challenge: China’s Population at the Beginning of the 21st Century, pp. 177–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
HeldermanA.MulderC. (2007) Intergenerational transmission of homeownership: the roles of gifts and continuities in housing market characteristics, Urban Studies, 44, pp. 231–247.
7.
HirayamaY.ForrestR. (2009) The uneven impact of neoliberalism on housing opportunities, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 998–1013.
8.
HuangY.ClarkW. A. V. (2002) Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: a multilevel analysis, Urban Studies, 39, pp. 7–32.
9.
HuangY.JiangL. (2009) Housing inequality in transitional Beijing, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, pp. 936–956.
10.
IzuharaM. (2010) Ageing and Intergenerational Relations: Family Reciprocity from a Global Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
11.
JonesG. A.ChantS. (2009) Globalising initiatives for gender equality and poverty reduction: exploring ‘failure’ with reference to education and work among urban youth in the Gambia and Ghana, Geoforum, 40, pp. 184–196.
12.
LamL. (2011) Changes in real estate investment in China after the financial tsunami, Chinese Economy, 4(3), pp. 59–70.
13.
LamT.ChiI.PitermanL.LamC.LaudeI. (1998) Community attitudes toward living arrangements between the elderly and their adult children in Hong Kong, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 13, pp. 215–228.
14.
LiB. (2002) Housing reforms and work incentive effects: a case study of Tianjin, People’s Republic of China. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
15.
LiB.DudaM. (2010) Employers as landlords for rural-to-urban migrants in Chinese cities, Environment and Urbanization, 22, pp. 13–31.
16.
LiB.YangY. (2012) Housing stratification and aging in urban China, International Perspectives on Aging, 2, pp. 209–219.
17.
LoganJ. R.BianF. (1999) Family values and coresidence with married children in urban China, Social Forces, 77, pp. 1253–1282.
18.
MayerC. J.EngelhardtG. V. (1996) Gifts, down payments, and housing affordability, Journal of Housing Research, 7, pp. 59–77.
19.
McCarthyK. J.ZhuT. (2011) The G-factor: evidence of the visible hand in the Chinese property market, and the implications for managers. Social Science Research Network, 11January (ssrn.com/abstract=1742959; accessed 22 August 2012).
20.
Metro Express (2010) Tianjin shiqu fangjia shourubi 19 zhi 20, shizhongxin maifang deiyong 20 nian [Tianjin city-centre house price–income ratio reached 19–20; 20 years to buy a house], 21May (http://tj.focus.cn/news/2010-05-21/939424.html; accessed 2 July 2010).
21.
MoserC. O. N. (2009) Ordinary Families, Extraordinary Lives: Assets and Poverty Reduction in Guayaquil, 1978–2004. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22.
MutchlerJ. E.BurrJ. A. (1991) A longitudinal analysis of household and non-household living arrangements in later life, Demography, 28, pp. 375–390.
23.
NgR. M. K.LiZ. (2010) East meets west: current mental health burdens in Greater China, in: MorganC.BhugraD. (Eds) Principles of Social Psychiatry, pp. 517–530. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
ÖstC. E. (2012) Parental wealth and first-time homeownership: a cohort study of family background and young adults’ housing situation in Sweden, Urban Studies, 49, pp. 2137–2152.
25.
SatoH. (2006) Housing inequality and housing poverty in urban China in the late 1990s, China Economic Review, 17, pp. 37–50.
26.
SerenyM. (2011) Living arrangements of older adults in China: the interplay among preferences, realities, and health, Research on Aging, 33(2), pp. 172–204.
27.
ShinH. B. (2010) Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters: the case of Nanluoguxiang in Beijing, Cities, 27, pp. S43–S54.
28.
ShinH. B. (2013) The right to the city and critical reflections on China’s property rights activism, Antipode, DOI:10.1111/anti.12010.
29.
SpiekerS. J.BensleyL. (1994) Roles of living arrangements and grandmother social support in adolescent mothering and infant attachment, Developmental Psychology, 30, pp. 102–111.
30.
SunR. (2002) Old age support in contemporary urban China from both parents, Research on Aging, 24, pp. 337–359.
UNPD (United Nations Population Division) (2005) Living arrangements of older persons around the world. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.
33.
WangS. Y. (2010) State misallocation and housing prices: theory and evidence from China, The American Economic Review, 101, pp. 2081–2107.
34.
WangY. P. (1996) The process of commercialisation of urban housing in China, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 971–989.
35.
WorobeyJ. L.AngelR. J. (1990) Functional capacity and living arrangements of unmarried elderly persons, The Journal of Gerontology, 45, pp. S95–S101.
36.
WuJ.GyourkoJ.DengY. (2010) Evaluating conditions in major Chinese housing markets. Working Paper No. 16189, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
37.
WuW. (2004) Sources of migrant housing disadvantage in urban China, Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 1285–1304.
38.
YanS.ChiI. (2001) Living arrangements and adult children’s support for the elderly in the new urban areas of mainland China, in: ChiI.ChappellN. L.LubbenJ. E. (Eds) Elderly Chinese in Pacific Rim Countries: Social Support and Integration, pp. 201–220. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
39.
ZhangQ. F. (2004) Economic transition and new patterns of parent–adult child coresidence in urban China, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, pp. 1231–1245.
40.
ZhangW. (2002) Zhongguo 2000nian quanguo renkou pucha ziliao [National census of China, 2000]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
41.
ZhouJ. (2011) Uncertainty and housing tenure choice by household types: evidence from China, China Economic Review, 22, pp. 408–427.
42.
ZhouM.LoganJ. R. (2002) Market transition and the commodification of housing in urban China, in: LoganJ. R. (Ed.) The New Chinese City: Globalization and Market Reform, pp. 137–152. Oxford: Blackwell.
