Making a low carbon economic future for the UK has been declared a key priority by both the previous Labour government and also the current coalition government. Yet there is a large gap between the symbolic representations of a low carbon future and their material manifestations in low carbon technologies and infrastructure in particular places. This paper addresses this gap through focusing on the organisation of urban low carbon transition activity. There is often significant capacity to act in reconfiguring urban energy systems that remains latent due to a missing organisational context for its co-ordination according to a mutually defined rationale or vision. This paper develops a conceptual framework to demonstrate and understand different modes of urban energy intermediation. Examples are used of intermediary organisation in London and Manchester to understand the strengths and partiality of each mode of intermediation and the necessity to integrate these different aspects of urban intermediary governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction. London: Routledge.
2.
BrennerN. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BulkeleyH. (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, pp. 229–253.
4.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM. M. (2003) Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
5.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM. M. (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change, Environmental Politics, 14(1), pp. 42–63.
6.
BulkeleyH.KernK. (2006) Local government and climate change governance in the UK and Germany, Urban Studies, 43(12), pp. 2237–2259.
7.
BulkeleyH.SchroederH. (2008) Governing climate change post-2012: the role of global cities—London. Working Paper No. 123, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia.
8.
BulkeleyH.SchroederH. (2012) Beyond state/non-state divides: global cities and the governing of climate change, European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), pp. 743–766.
9.
CallonM. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in: LawJ. (Ed.) Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196–233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10.
DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change) (2009) The UK low carbon transition plan. DECC, London.
11.
DECC (2011) The Energy Bill. DECC, London.
12.
GambleA. (2009) The Spectre at the Feast: Capitalist Crisis and the Politics of Recession. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
GeelsF. (2005) Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930): a case study in multi-level perspective, Technology in Society, 27, pp. 363–397.
14.
GrahamS. (Ed.) (2010) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. London: Routledge.
15.
GrahamS.MarvinS. (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
16.
GuyS.MarvinS.MossT. (2001) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Buildings and Plans. London: Earthscan.
17.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2007a) Cities mediating technological transitions: the adaptability of infrastructure and infrastructures of adaptability?, in: GeyerH. S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Urban Policy, pp. 240–258. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2007b) Understanding the role of the national exemplar in constructing ‘strategic glurbanisation’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), pp. 303–325.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2009a) Cities mediating technological transitions: understanding visions, intermediation and consequences, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 21(4), pp. 515–534.
21.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2009b) Report—conceptualizing and understanding intermediaries in context: developing an enhanced understanding of context, actors and transferability. Changing Behaviour Project, 7th Framework Programme, European Commission.
22.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2010a) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?, Research Policy, 39(4), pp. 477–485.
23.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2010b) World Cities and Climate Change: Producing Urban Ecological Security. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
24.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2012) Mediating low-carbon urban transitions? Forms of organisation, knowledge and action, European Planning Studies, 20(3), pp. 421–439.
25.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2013) Low Carbon Nation: Urban and Regional Transition to Green Capitalism. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
26.
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2008) World Energy Outlook. Paris: IEA.
27.
IlesP.YollesM. (2002) Across the great divide: HRD, technology translation, and knowledge migration in bridging the knowledge gap between SMEs and Universities, HRDI, 5(1), pp. 23–53.
28.
KernK.BulkeleyH. (2009) Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), pp. 309–332.
29.
LatourB. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
LenteH.van, HekkertM.SmitsR.van WaverenB. (2003) Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), pp. 247–279.
32.
Mayor of London (2007) Action today to protect tomorrow: the Mayor’s climate change action plan. Greater London Authority, London.
33.
MeddW.MarvinS. (2008) Making water work: intermediating between regional strategy and local practice, Environment and Planning D, 26, pp. 280–299.
34.
PioreM. (2001) The emergent role of social intermediaries in the new economy, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 72(3), pp. 339–350.
35.
RussellS.WilliamsR. (2002) Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy with glossary ofsocial shaping concepts, in: SorensenK.WilliamsR. (Eds) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools, pp. 37–132. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36.
WhileA. (2007) Climate change and planning: carbon control and spatial regulation, Town Planning Review, 78(6), pp. vii–xiii.
37.
WhileA.JonasA. E. G.GibbsD. (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), pp. 76–93.
