Being amongst strangers is a definitive aspect of life in the modern city. To understand social inclusion in cities, it is necessary to consider not only the strength and extent of social networks of familiarity, but also the role of interactions with strangers in the public realm. People with intellectual disability are considered one of the most marginalised groups in society and the study applies the concept of encounter to offer a new perspective on their inclusion/exclusion, informed by contemporary urban theory rather than more nostalgic notions of community. The paper discusses encounters between people with and without intellectual disability in one suburb in Melbourne, Australia. The study is based, primarily, on field observations in a variety of settings in the public realm. Through analysis of these data, a typology of urban encounters is proposed that involves people with and without intellectual disability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2010) Regional profile (http://www.abs.gov.au; accessed 10 October 2012).
2.
AhmedS. (2000) Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
3.
AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) (2012) Disability support services: services provided under the National Disability Agreement 2010–2011. AIHW, Canberra.
4.
BigbyC. (2008) Known well by no-one: trends in the informal social networks of middle-aged and older people with intellectual disability five years after moving to the community, Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 33, pp. 148–157.
5.
BigbyC.WieselI. (2011) Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: between and beyond community presence and community participation, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 36, pp. 259–263.
6.
CastellsM. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
ClementT.BigbyC. (2009) Breaking out of a distinct social space: reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disability, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 22, pp. 264–275.
8.
ClementT.BigbyC. (2010) Group Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Encouraging Inclusion and Participation. London: Jessica Kingsley.
9.
FincherR.IvesonK. (2008) Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Forrester-JonesR.CarpenterJ.Coolen-SchrijnerP.CambridgeP.. (2006) The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, pp. 285–295.
11.
GeertzC. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
12.
GleesonB. (1999) Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
HallE. (2005) The entangled geographies of social exclusion/inclusion for people with learning disabilities, Health and Place, 11, pp. 107–115.
15.
JacobsJ. (1962) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: Jonathan Cape.
16.
KozmaA.MansellJ.Beadle-BrownJ. (2009) Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: a systematic review, American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, pp. 193–222.
17.
LaurierE.WhyteA.BucknerK. (2002) Neighbouring as an occasioned activity: ‘finding a lost cat’, Space and Culture, 15, pp. 346–367.
18.
MansellJ.Beadle-BrownJ. (2010) Deinstitutionalisation and community living: position statement of the Comparative Policy and Practice Special Interest Research Group of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, pp. 104–112.
19.
MetzelD. S. (2005) Places of social poverty and service dependency of people with intellectual disabilities: a case study in Baltimore, Maryland, Health and Place, 11, pp. 93–105.
20.
Noonan WalshP.EmersonE.LobbC.HattonC.. (2008) Supported accommodation services for people with intellectual disabilities: a review of models and instruments used to measure quality of life in various settings. National Disability Authority, Dublin.
21.
O’BrienJ.LyleC. (1987) A Framework for Accomplishment. Decatur, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
22.
ReeveD. (2012) Psycho-emotional disablism: the missing link?, in: WatsonN.RoulstoneA.ThomasC. (Eds) Routledge Companion to Disability Studies, ch. 7. London: Routledge.
23.
SennettR. (1994) Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization. London: Faber and Faber.
24.
SolomonM. R.SurprenantC.CzepielJ. A.GutmanE. G. (1985) A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter, The Journal of Marketing, 49, pp. 99–111.
25.
TajbakhshK. (2001) The Promise of the City: Space, Identity and Politics in Contemporary Social Thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
UrryJ. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.
27.
ValentineG. (2008) Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter, Progress in Human Geography, 32, pp. 323–337.
28.
WatsonS. (2006) City Publics: The (Dis)enchantments of Urban Encounters. London: Routledge.
29.
YoungI. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
