The ‘sandwich class’ is an East Asian term referring to the lower middle class. Using a large and unique micro dataset collected in Guangzhou, this paper examines empirically the potential determinants of housing affordability of the ‘sandwich class’. It is found that an individual’s self-perceived range of housing options is dependent not only on his/her current and predictable economic and financial resources, but also on his/her occupation and socio-demographic characteristics. The empirical findings are found to be robust against potential endogeneity problems and not sensitive to the regression specifications used. The empirical findings reported here help to deepen our understanding of the homeownership affordability determinants of the lower middle class in emerging economies characterised by an underdeveloped housing system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsB. (2009) Macroeconomic implications of China urban housing privatization, 1998–1999, Journal of Contemporary China, 18(62), pp. 881–888.
2.
ADB (Asia Development Bank) (2010) The rise of Asia’s middle class, in: Asia Development Bank (Ed.) Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2010, Part 1: Special Chapter. Metro Manila, Philippines: ADB.
3.
BertaudA. (2009) Housing affordability in China: a stock and flow approach. Paper presented at The Symposium on Low-income Housing in China, Beijing University, July.
4.
BourassaS. C.YinM. (2006) Housing tenure choice in Australia and the United States: impacts of alternative subsidy policies, Real Estate Economics, 34(2), pp. 303–328.
5.
ButtimerR. J.GuA. Y.YangT. T. (2004) The Chinese housing provident fund, International Real Estate Review, 7(1), pp. 1–30.
6.
ChenJ.ZhangX. (2012) Housing demand and housing policy of the young sandwich group in mainland China: a survey of young white-collar employees in Shanghai, Journal of Youth Studies, 15(1), pp. 130–143 [in Chinese].
7.
ChenJ.GuoF.ZhuA. (2011) The housing-led growth hypothesis revisited: evidence from the Chinese provincial panel data, Urban Studies, 48(10), pp. 2049–2067.
8.
ChenJ.HaoQ.StephensM. (2010) Assessing housing affordability in post-reform China: a case study of Shanghai, Housing Studies, 25(6), pp. 877–901.
9.
Chi-Man HuiE. (2000) The housing allowance scheme in Guangzhou, Habitat International, 24(1), pp. 19–29.
10.
DavidsonR.McKinnonJ. G. (1993) Estimation and Interference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DengL.ShenQ.WangL. (2011) The emerging housing policy framework in China, Journal of Planning Literature, 26(2), pp. 168–183.
12.
Diaz-SerranoL. (2005) Labor income uncertainty, skewness and homeownership: a panel data study for Germany and Spain, Journal of Urban Economics, 58(1), pp. 156–176.
13.
DolingJ. (1999) Housing policies and the little tigers: how do they compare with other industrialised countries?, Housing Studies, 14(2), pp. 229–250.
14.
EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) (2011) Building Rome in a day: the sustainability of China’s housing boom. Report, Access China Service, The Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
15.
FuY. (1995) Uncertainty, next term liquidity, and housing choices, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(2), pp. 223–236.
16.
GoodmanA. C. (1988) An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 23(3), pp. 327–353.
17.
GoodmanA. C.KawaiM. (1982) Permanent income, hedonic price, and demand for housing: new evidence, Journal of Urban Economics, 12(2), pp. 214–237.
18.
GrovesR.MurieA.WatsonC. (2007) Housing and the New Welfare State: Perspectives from East Asia and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
HancockK. E. (1993) ‘Can pay? Won’t pay?’ or economic principles of ‘affordability’, Urban Studies, 30(1), pp. 127–145.
21.
HuiE. C.SeabrookeB. (2000) The housing allowance scheme in Guangzhou, Habitat International, 24(1), pp. 19–29.
22.
HulchanskiD. J. (1995) The concept of housing affordability: six contemporary uses of the housing expenditure-to-income ratio, Housing Studies, 10(4), pp. 471–492.
23.
KwongH.-Y. F. (1995) Housing for the middle income group: sandwich class housing loan scheme (1993). MA thesis, University of Hong Kong.
24.
LeeJ. (1994) Affordability, homeownership and the middle class housing crisis in Hong Kong, Policy and Politics, 22(3), pp. 170–190.
25.
LiS.-M.YiZ. (2007) Financing home purchase in China, with special reference to Guangzhou, Housing Studies, 22(3), pp. 409–425.
26.
LiangY.HuoZ.LiuK. (2010) An empirical study on the family wealth distribution in urban and rural China, Economic Research, (10), pp. 33–47 [in Chinese].
27.
LinnemanP. D.MegbolugbeI. F. (1992) Housing affordability: myth or reality?, Urban Studies, 29(3), pp. 369–392.
28.
LoganJ. R.FangY.ZhangZ. (2010) The winners in China’s urban housing reform, Housing Studies, 25(1), pp. 101–117.
29.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edn.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
30.
MengX. (2004) Economic restructuring and income inequality in urban China, Review of Income and Wealth, 50(3), pp. 357–379.
31.
RavallionM. (2010) The developing world’s bulging (but vulnerable) middle class, World Development, 38(4), pp. 445–454.
32.
RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) (2011) RICS housing research: 30% of Hong Kong households are sandwich class who may not afford to buy private housing. RICS Asia, Hong Kong (http://www.ricsasia.org/newsDetail.php?id=305®ionID=0).
33.
RonaldR. (2007) Comparing homeowner societies: can we construct an east–west model?, Housing Studies, 22(4), pp. 473–493.
34.
RonaldR.DolingJ. (2010) Shifting East Asian approaches to home ownership and the housing welfare pillar, International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(3), pp. 233–254.
35.
StephensM. (2010) Locating Chinese urban housing policy in an international context, Urban Studies, 47(14), pp. 2965–2982.
36.
StoneM. E. (2006) What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach, Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), pp. 151–184.
37.
ThalmannP. (2003) ‘House poor’ or simply ‘poor’?, Journal of Housing Economics, 12(4), pp. 291–317.
38.
WangY. P.MurieA. (2011) The new affordable and social housing provision system in China: implications for comparative housing studies, International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(3), pp. 237–254.
39.
WeiS.-J.ZhangX.LiuY. (2012) Status competition and housing prices: some evidence from China. Working Paper No. 18000, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
40.
WuJ.GyourkoJ.DengY. (2012) Evaluating conditions in major Chinese housing markets, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(3), pp. 531–543.
41.
YangZ.WangS. (2011) The impact of privatization of public housing on housing affordability in Beijing: an assessment using household survey data, Local Economy, 26(5), pp. 384–400.
42.
YeungS. C.-W.HowesR. (2006) The role of the housing provident fund in financing affordable housing development in China, Habitat International, 30(2), pp. 343–356.
43.
ZenouY. (2010) Housing policies in China: issues and options. Working Paper No. 824, IFN (Research Institute of Industrial Economics), Lund University.
44.
ZhengS.FuY.LiuH. (2006) Housing-choice hindrances and urban spatial structure: evidence from matched location and location-preference data in Chinese cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3), pp. 535–557.
