Rent control is still an important type of government regulation of housing markets in many countries and numerous researchers have studied its implications for allocation, welfare and investments in housing. The present paper aims to improve our understanding of the effect of second-generation rent control when it is applied only to one sector of the rental market. It is diagrammatically shown that the welfare effects are very different between a universal and a limited application of rent control. Studying the Danish case of second-generation rent control, lower rents are found in controlled sectors and a minor increase of the rent in the uncontrolled sector. Using the area of living space in the dwelling as a measure for housing consumption, evidence is also produced of both overallocation and underallocation of housing in the rent-controlled sectors; as envisaged by economic theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenS. H. (2008) Is the private rented sector an efficient producer of housing service? Private landlords in Denmark and their economic strategies, European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(3), pp. 263–286.
2.
AndersenS. H.SkakM. (2008) Privat boligudlejning: motiver, strategi og økonomi. Institute Research Publicaton No. SBi 2008:01, Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, Aalborg Universitet, Hørsholm.
3.
ArnottR. (1995) Time for revisionism on rent control, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, pp. 99–120.
4.
Danish Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (2000) Rents 1999. By- og Boligministeriet, Huslejen i 1999, Copenhagen.
5.
EarlyD. W. (2000) Rent control, rental housing supply, and the distribution of tenant benefits, Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), pp. 185–204.
6.
Economic Councils (2001) Danish economy: spring 2001. Det Økonomiske Råd, Dansk Økonomi forår 2001, Copenhagen.
7.
EdinP. A.EnglundP. (1991) Moving costs and housing demand: are recent movers really in equilibrium?, Journal of Public Economics, 44, pp. 299–320.
8.
FallisG.SmithL. B. (1984) Uncontrolled prices in a controlled market: the case of rent controls, The American Economic Review, 74(1), pp. 193–200.
9.
GlaeserE. L. (1996) The social costs of rent control revisited. Working Paper No. 544, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
10.
GlaeserE. L.LuttmerE. F. P. (1997) The misallocation of housing under rent control. Working Paper No. 6220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
11.
GlaeserE. L.LuttmerE. F. P. (2003) The misallocation of housing under rent control, The American Economic Review, 93(4), pp. 1027–1046.
12.
GyourkoJ.LinnemanP. (1990) Rent controls and rental housing quality: a note on the effects of New York City’s old controls, Journal of Urban Economics, 27, pp. 398–409.
13.
HäcknerJ.NybergS. (2000) Rent control and prices of owner-occupied housing, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(29), pp. 311–324.
14.
HoffmannJ.KurzC. (2002) Rent indices for housing in West Germany 1985 to 1998. Working Paper No. 116, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main.
15.
HubertF. (1993) The impact of rent control on the rents in the free sector, Urban Studies, 30(1), pp. 51–61.
16.
HubertF. (1995) Contracting with costly tenants, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(5), pp. 631–654.
17.
LarsenE. R.SommervollD. E. (2009) The impact on rent from tenant and landlord characteristics and interaction, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(3), pp. 316–322.
18.
LindH. (2007) The story and the model done: an evaluation of mathematical models of rent control, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(2), pp. 183–198.
19.
MarksD. (1984) The effect of partial-coverage rent control on the price and quantity of rental housing, Journal of Urban Economics, 16(3), pp. 360–369.
20.
MrozT. (1987) The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions, Econometrica, 55(4), pp. 765–799.
21.
MunchJ. R.SvarerM. (2002) Rent control and tenancy duration, Journal of Urban Economics, 52(3), pp. 542–560.
22.
MuthR. F. (1974) Moving costs and housing expenditure, Journal of Urban Economics, 1, pp. 108–125.
OlsenE. O. (1998) Economics of rent control, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28(6), pp. 673–678.
25.
RendersA.GaeremynckA. (2006) Corporate governance and performance: controlling for sample selection bias and endogeneity. Open Access Publication No. urn:hdl:123456789/200132, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
26.
SimsD. P. (2007) Out of control: what can we learn from the end of Massachusetts rent control?, Journal of Urban Economics, 61(1), pp. 129–151.
27.
SvarerM.RosholmM.MunchJ. R. (2005) Rent control and unemployment duration, Journal of Public Economics, 89(11/12), pp. 2165–2181.
28.
WooldridgeJ. M. (1995) Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions, Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp. 115–132.
29.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th edn.Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
