This paper focuses on a relatively overlooked aspect of social polarisation in Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei: its gender implications. The transformation of these cities, from industrial to post-industrial cities, has been accompanied by a transition from Chinese patriarchal society to modern society. A dual gendered structure is emerging—a regime of labour intimacy (RLI) under state regulations and a technomuscular capitalism (TMC), presenting itself as a competitive labour market. Migrant workers are introduced to compensate for the loss of household labour, but the wage gap between them and their local counterparts may be controlled. The occupational segmentation and income disparity between men and women are improving because of the upgrade of women’s status. The model of bound RLIs and open TMCs emphasises a more contextually situated construction in which state migration policies and changing gender status play an intermediate role in the division of labour between work and home.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongD. (1999) Hidden male unemployment in Northern Ireland, Regional Studies, 33(6), pp. 499–511.
2.
BaumS. (1997) Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarisation thesis, Urban Studies, 34(11), pp. 1881–1902.
3.
BaumS. (1999) Social transformation in the global city: Singapore, Urban Studies, 36(7), pp. 1095–1117.
4.
Borel-SaladinJ.CrankshawO. (2009) Social polarisation or professionalisation? Another look at theory and evidence on deindustrialisation and the rise of the service sector, Urban Studies, 46(3), pp. 645–664.
5.
BrowneI.MisraJ. (2003) The intersection of race and gender in the labor market, Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), pp. 487–514.
6.
BruegelI. (1979) Women as a reserve army of labour: a note on recent British experience, Feminist Review, 3, pp. 12–13.
7.
BruegelI. (1996) Gendering the polarisation debate: a comment on Hamnett’s ‘social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes’, Urban Studies, 33(8), pp. 1431–1439.
8.
BurgersJ. (1996) No polarisation in Dutch cities? Inequality in a corporatist country, Urban Studies, 33(1), pp. 99–105.
9.
ChangC.EnglandP. (2011) Gender inequality in earnings in industrialized East Asia, Social Science Research, 40(1), pp. 1–14.
10.
ChangK. A.LingL. H. M. (2010) Globalization and its intimate other: Filipina domestic workers in Hong Kong in gender and global restructuring, in: MarchandM.RunyanA. S. (Eds) Sightings, Site and Resistances, pp. 30–47. London: Routledge.
11.
ChengS. A. (1996) Migrant women domestic workers in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan: a comparative analysis, in: BattisteG.PaganoniA. (Eds) Asian Women in Migration, pp. 109–122. Quezon City: Scalabrini Migration Centre.
12.
ChiuS. W. K.LuiT. (2004a) Global city, dual city? Globalization and social polarization in Hong Kong since the 1990s. Occasional paper, Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
13.
ChiuS. W. K.LuiT. (2004b) Testing the global city–social polarisation thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s, Urban Studies, 41(10), pp. 1863–1888.
14.
CollinsP. H. (1986) Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of black feminist thought, Social Problems, 33(6), pp. S14–S32.
15.
CowardR. (1999) Sacred Cows: Is Feminism Relevant to the New Millennium?London: Harper Collins.
16.
FainsteinS. (2001) Inequality in global city-regions, in: ScottA. J. (Ed.) Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, pp. 285–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FaludiS. (1999) Stiffed: The Betrayal of Modern Man. London: Chatto & Windus.
19.
FarleyJ. (1987) Disproportionate Black and Hispanic unemployment in U.S. metropolitan areas: the roles of racial inequality, segregation and discrimination in male joblessness, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 46(2), pp. 129–150.
20.
ForrestR. S.La GrangeA.YipN. (2004) Hong Kong as a global city? Social distance and spatial differentiation, Urban Studies, 41(1), pp. 207–228.
21.
FriedmannJ. (1986) The world city hypothesis, Development and Change, l7(1), pp. 69–83.
22.
FriedmannR.ChangM. C.SunT. H.WeinsteinM. (1984) The fertility transition in Taiwan, in: ThorntonA.LinH. (Eds) Social Change and the Family in Taiwan, pp. 264–304. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
HamnettC. (1994) Social polarisation in global cities: theory and evidence, Urban Studies, 31(3), pp. 401–424.
24.
HamnettC. (1996) Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare regimes, Urban Studies, 33(8), pp. 1407–1430.
25.
HamnettC. (2001) Social segregation and polarisation, in: PaddisonR. (Ed.) Handbook of Urban Studies, pp. 162–176. London: Sage.
26.
HegewischA. (2000) Moving towards the American model? Women and unemployment in Great Britain, in: JensonJ.LauferJ.MaruaniM. (Eds) The Gendering of Inequalities: Women, Men and Work, pp. 202–211. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
27.
HillR. C.KimJ. K. (2000) Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul, Urban Studies, 37(12), pp. 2167–2195.
28.
JacquelineB.CrankshawO. (1999) Social polarisation or professionalisation? Another look at theory and evidence on deindustrialisation and the rise of the service sector, Urban Studies, 46(3), pp. 645–664.
29.
JonesG.StraughanP. T.ChanA. (2009) Ultra-low Fertility in Pacific Asia: Trends, Causes and Policy Issues. Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
LanP.-C. (2008) Global cinderellas: sexuality, power and situational practices across borders, in: JacksonS.JieyuL.JuhyunW. (Eds) East Asian Sexualities: Modernities, Gender and New Sexual Cultures, pp. 1–13. London: Zed Books.
MollenkopfJ. H.CastellsM. (1991) Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
McCallL. (2001) Complex Inequality. New York: Routledge.
34.
McCallL. (2005) The complexity of intersectionality, Sign, 30(3), pp. 1771–1800.
35.
McCannE. (2004) Urban political economy beyond the ‘global city’, Urban Studies, 41(12), pp. 2315–2333.
36.
McDowellL. M. (2001) Women, men, cities, in: PaddisonR. (Ed.) Handbook of Urban Studies, pp. 206–219. London: Sage.
37.
MenahemG.EliasN. (2007) Gendered occupational differences and earnings gaps in globalising urban economies: the case of Tel-Aviv, Urban Studies, 44(11), pp. 2211–2229.
38.
NgoH. Y. (1997) Women and employment in Asian newly-industrialized countries, International Journal of Employment Studies, 5(1), pp. 67–93.
39.
NørgaardH. (2003) The global city thesis–social polarization and changes in the distribution of wages, Geografiska Annaler, 85B(2), pp. 103–117.
40.
RobinsonJ. (2002) Global and world cities, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), pp. 531–554.
41.
RubinG. (1975) The traffic in women: notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex, in: ReiterR. (Ed.) Toward an Anthropology of Women, pp. 157–210. New York: Monthly Review Press.
42.
SassenS. (1991) The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
SidneyB. W.ChoeM. K.RetherfordR. D. (2010) Very low fertility in Asia: is there a problem? Can it be solved?, Asia Pacific Issues, 94, pp. 1–12.
44.
SiuH. F. (2008) Positioning ‘Hong Kongers’ and ‘new immigrants’, in: SiuH. F.KuA. S. (Eds) Hong Kong Mobility: Making a Global Population, pp. 117–147. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
45.
TaiP.-F. (2005) Social polarization and income inequality: migration and urban labour market, in: KwokR. Y. (Ed.) Globalizing Taipei, pp. 141–166. New York: Routledge.
46.
TaiP.-F. (2006) Social polarisation: comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei, Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1737–1756.
47.
TaiP.-F. (2010) Beyond ‘social polarization’? A test for Asian world cities in developmental states, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), pp. 1–19.
WangC. H. (2003) Taipei as a global city: a theoretical and empirical examination, Urban Studies, 40(2), pp. 309–334.
50.
WeylandP. (1997) Gender lives in global spaces, in: OncuA.WeylandP. (Eds) Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Global Cities, pp. 82–97. London: Zed Books.
51.
WilsonW. J. (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
WilsonW. J. (1996) When Work Disappears. New York: Alfred Knopf.
YeohB. S. A. (2006) Bifurcated labour: the unequal incorporation of transmigrants in Singapore, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 97(1), pp. 26–37.
55.
YeohB. S. A.ChangT. C. (2001) Globalising Singapore: debating transnational flows in the city, Urban Studies, 38(7), pp. 1025–1044.
56.
YeohB. S. A.HuangS. (1999) Singapore women and foreign domestic workers: negotiating domestic worker and motherhood, in: MomsenJ. H. (Ed.) Gender, Migration and Domestic Service, pp. 277–300. London: Routledge.
