Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (SEZ) has been the flagship labouratory of Deng Xiaoping’s reform and open-door policy and the forerunner of China’s capitalist transformation. The initiation of the Shenzhen SEZ was driven by the imperative of political and economic survival along the state hierarchy and was informed by the international practices of export processing zones (EPZs). Shenzhen’s capitalist fundamentals, such as the commodification of land and labour, were largely established through imitating its ‘big master’ Hong Kong across the border. However, Shenzhen’s policy learning style has gradually shifted from laissez-faire Hong Kong to authoritarian Singapore, propelled by the aspiration, shared among policy-making party élites across China’s administrative hierarchy, of perpetuating the single-party rule. Theoretically, this paper demonstrates how policy mobility is shaped path-dependently by the pre-structured institutional/ideological regime, in what ways the idiosyncratic geographical/historical conjuncture matters, and why political representation and participation are crucial to policy selection and mutation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrighiG. (2007) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-first Century. London: Verso.
2.
BrennerN.PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2009) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways, Global Networks, 10, pp. 1–41.
3.
CaiH. (2010) From big chill to warm ties: China and Singapore, Straits Times, 18December.
4.
CartierC. (2001) Globalizing South China. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
ChanK. W. (2009) The Chinese hukou system at 50, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(2), pp. 197–221.
6.
ChanM. H. (1985) What are the problems of Shenzhen?, Wide Angle, 152, pp. 48–55.
7.
CraneG. (1990) The Political Economy of China’s Special Economic Zones. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
8.
DengX. (1993) Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume III (1982–1992). Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.
9.
DengX. (1994) Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume II (1975–1982). Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.
10.
DobbinF.SimmonsB.GarrettG. (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, pp. 449–472.
11.
The Economist (2010) End of an experiment, 17July, pp. 73–76.
HarveyD. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
HeS.WuF. (2009) China’s emerging neoliberal urbanism: perspectives from urban redevelopment, Antipode, 41(2), pp. 282–304.
17.
HuangC.MoX. (1990) Shenzhen Jingji Tequ Chuangyeshi [The Entrepreneurial History of Shenzhen’s Special Economic Zone]. Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.
18.
IdawatiD. (2010) Imagining Surabaya’s new image: to be another Singapore?Paper presented at Workshop on Global Urban Frontiers: Asian Cities in Theory, Practice and Imagination, National University of Singapore, September.
19.
IHS (Institute of History Studies of the CCP of Guangdong Province) (2008) Guangdong Gaige Kaifang Juecezhe Fangtanlu [Interviews with the Decision-makers of Guangdong’s Opening up and Reforms]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Renmin Chubanshe.
20.
KamL. W. (2008) First China centre for Singapore studies, Straits Times, 1November.
21.
LaiH. (2006) Reform and Non-state Economy in China: The Political Economy of Liberalization Strategies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
LandryF. P. (2008) Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LarnerW.Le HeronR. (2002) From economic globalization to globalizing economic processes: towards post-structural political economies, Geoforum, 33, pp. 415–419.
24.
LiewL. H. (2005) China’s engagement with neo-liberalism: path dependency, geography and party self-reinvention, Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), pp. 331–352.
25.
LiuJ. (1998) Guihua, Guotu, Fangdichan: Xianggang Chenggong Jingyan Ji Jiejian Yiyi [Planning, land, and real estate: Hong Kong’s successful experiences and learning points]. Shenzhen: Haitian Publishing House.
26.
LiuR. (2002) Xianggang Zhengfu de Juese yu Jiejian [The role of Hong Kong’s government and learning points]. Shenzhen: Haitian Publishing House.
27.
LuY. (2007) Xinjiapo Weishenme Neng [Why Can Singapore Do It?] Nanchang: Jiangxi People Chubanshe.
28.
MasseyD. (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place, in: BirdJ.CurtisB.PutmanT.RobertsonG.TicknerL. (Eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, pp. 59–69. New York: Routledge.
29.
McCannE. (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), pp. 107–130.
30.
McCannE.WardK. (2012) Assembling urbanism: following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making, Environment and Planning A, 44, pp. 42–51.
31.
Nanfang Dushibao [Southern City Daily] (2007)
Guangdong shengwei shuji Wang Yang: Guangshen yao gan jiaoban Xinjiapo [Guangdong Party Secretary Wang Yang: Guangzhou and Shenzhen should dare to challenge Singapore], 27December.
32.
NaughtonB. (1995) Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform 1978–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
NorthD. (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
NUS (National University of Singapore) (2010) Minister Li Yuanchao officiates launch of new Master’s programme in Chinese, Knowledge Enterprise, May/June.
36.
OngA. (2011) Worlding cities, or the urban art of being global, in: RoyA.OngA. (Eds) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, pp. 1–26. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
37.
Organisational Department of CCP Shenzhen Committee (2003) Shenzhen Cadre Overseas Training Implementation Plan. 23April.
38.
PeckJ. (2004) Geography and public policy: constructions of neoliberalism, Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), pp. 445–455.
39.
PeckJ. (2011) Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation, Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), pp. 773–797.
40.
PereiraA. (2008) Wither the developmental state? Explaining Singapore’s continued developmentalism, Third World Quarterly, 29(6), pp. 1189–1203.
41.
RobinsonJ. (2011) The spaces of circulating knowledge: city strategies and global urban governmentality, in: McCannE.WardK. (Eds) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age, pp. 15–40. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
ShatkinG. (2011) The true meaning of the Singapore model: state capitalism and urban planning [mimeograph].
Shenzhen Municipal Government (2011) The Master Plan of Shenzhen’s National Innovative City (2011–2013).
45.
Shenzhen Science and Technology Expert Committee (2006) Investigation report on Singapore’s indigenous innovation.
46.
Shenzhen Statistical Bureau (2010) Shenzhen Statistical Yearbook. Shenzhen: China Statistical Publishing House.
47.
SongJ. (2010) Zhongguo ‘shizhangban’ zuire huati shi chengshi guanli he huanjing baohu [The hottest topics of China’s ‘mayors’ class’ are urban governance and environmental protection], 21st Century Business Herald, 20September.
48.
TaoR.SuF.LiuM.CaoG. (2010) Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: evidence from prefecture-level cities, Urban Studies, 47(10), pp. 2217–2236.
49.
TaoY.LuZ. (2008) Zhongguo Jingji Tequ Shilun [A Historical Study of China’s Special Economic Zones]. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian Chubanshe.
50.
WadeR. (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
WangJ. (2010) Shenzhen xuxie ‘chuanqi’: xiayibu jiaoban Xinjiapo, Xianggang [Shenzhen to continue its ‘miracle’: next step is to challenge Singapore and Hong Kong], Liaowang News Weekly, 21August.
52.
WangY. (2008) Zai Quansheng Tuijin Chanye Zhuanyi he Laodongli Zhuanyi Gongzuo Huiyi Shangde Jianghua [Speech on the Provincial Conference on Propelling Industrial Transformation and Labour Transformation], Nanfang Daily, 30May.
53.
WardK. (2006) ‘Policies in motion’, urban management and state restructuring: the trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, pp. 54–70.
54.
WardK. (2007) Temporary staffing, ‘geographies of circulation’, and the business of delivering neoliberalization, in: EnglandK.WardK. (Eds) Neoliberalization: States, Networks, Peoples, pp. 110–136. Oxford: Blackwell.
