School Choice and Increasing Performance Difference: A Counterfactual Approach

Abstract

In recent years, structural changes to the school system, including the introduction of independent schools, have increased school choice alternatives in Sweden. Consequently, a large share of today’s students attend a school other than the one closest to home. Since the compulsory school system is designed to be free of charge and to offer the same standard of education everywhere, increasing school choice– hypothetically—should not increase the between-school variation in grades. In reality, however, between-school variation in grades has increased in recent years. The aim of this paper is to test whether increasing between-school variance can be explained by changes in residential patterns, or if it must be attributed to structural change. Using a counterfactual approach, the students’ variations in grades are compared between observed schools of graduation and hypothetical schools of graduation. The multilevel results indicate that school choice seems to increase between-school variation of grades.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alegre

M. A.

Ferrer

(2010) School regimes and education equity: some insights based on PISA 2006, British Educational Research Journal, 36, pp. 433–461.

Allen

(2007) Allocating pupils to their nearest secondary school: the consequences for social and ability stratification, Urban Studies, 44, pp. 751–770.

Andersson

Subramanian

S. V.

(2006) Explorations of neighbourhood and educational outcomes for young Swedes, Urban Studies, 43, pp. 2013–2025.

Andersson

Östh

Malmberg

(2010) Ethnic segregation and performance inequality in the Swedish school system: a regional perspective, Environment and Planning A, 42(11), pp. 2674–2686.

Bergsten

(2010) Bättre framtidsutsikter? Blandade bostadsområden och grannskapseffekter: en analys av visioner och effekter av blandat boende [Better prospects through social mix? Mixed neighbourhoods and neighbourhood effects: an analysis of the purpose and effects of social mix policy]. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.

Bernelius

(2005) Onko oppimistulokset valettu betoniin? Tutkimus Helsingin kaupunkirakenteen ja peruskoulujen oppimistulosten yhteydestä ja kouluvalintojen vaikutuksista [Are educational outcomes real estate? A study of the relationship between urban socioeconomic structure and educational outcomes, and about the effect of school choice].

Björklund

Edin

P.-A.

Fredriksson

Krueger

(2004) Education, equality and efficiency: an analysis of Swedish school reforms during the 1990s. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala.

Brännström

(2008) Making their mark: the effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement, European Sociological Review, 24(4), pp. 463–478.

Bunar

(2010a) The geographies of education and relationships in a multicultural city, Acta Sociologica, 53, pp. 141–159.

10.

Bunar

(2010b) Choosing for quality or inequality: current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden, Journal of Education Policy, 25, pp. 1–18.

11.

Burgess

McConnell

Propper

Wilson

(2007) The impact of school choice on sorting by ability and socio-economic factors in English secondary education, in: Woessmann

Peterson

P. E.

(Eds) Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem, pp. 273–291. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

12.

(2005) En av fem går i skola långt bort [One in five in a school far away]. Interview with Nihad Bunar, Dagens Nyheter, 14 November (http://www.dn.se/sthlm/en-av-fem-gar-i-skola-langt-bort-1.410989).

13.

Byrne

(2009) Not just class: towards an understanding of the whiteness of middle-class schooling choice, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, pp. 424–441.

14.

Dryler

(2001) Etnisk segregation i skolan—effekter på ungdomars betyg och övergång till gymnasieskolan, in: Välfärdens finansiering och fördelning, pp. 319–355. Socialdepartementet, Forskarantologi från Kommittén Välfärdsbokslut, Stockholm.

15.

Fekjaer

S. N.

Birkelund

G. E.

(2007) Does the ethnic composition of upper secondary schools influence educational achievement and attainment? A multilevel analysis of the Norwegian case, European Sociological Review, 23, pp. 309–323.

16.

Friedman

(1955) The role of government in education, in: Solo

R. A.

(Ed.) Economics and the Public Interest. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

17.

Garcia

D. R.

(2008) Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: do parents sort students into specialized charter schools?, Education and Urban Society, 40, pp. 590–612.

18.

Harris

R. J.

(2012) Local indices of segregation with application to social segregation between London’s secondary schools, 2003–2008/9, Environment and Planning A, 44, pp. 669–687.

19.

Harris

Johnston

Burgess

(2007) Neighborhoods, ethnicity and school choice: developing a statistical framework for geodemographic analysis, Population Research and Policy Review, 26, pp. 553–579.

20.

Karsten

Ledoux

Roeleveld

Felix

Elshof

(2003) School choice and ethnic segregation, Educational Policy, 17, pp. 452–477.

21.

Kauppinen

(2008) Schools as mediators of neighbourhood effects on choice between vocational and academic tracks of secondary education in Helsinki, European Sociological Review, 24, pp. 379–391.

22.

Leckie

(2009) The complexity of school and neighbourhood effects and movements of pupils on school differences in models of educational achievement. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.

23.

Lindbom

(2010) School choice in Sweden: effects on student performance, school costs, and segregation, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), pp. 615–630.

24.

Lindbom

Almgren

(2007) Valfrihetens effekter på skolornas elevsammansättning: Skolsegregationen i Sverige, in: Lindbom

(Ed.) Friskolorna och framtiden: segregation, kostnader och effektivitet, pp. 89–119. Stockholm: Institutet för framtidsstudier.

25.

Luyten

J. W.

Scheerens

Visscher

A. J.

Maslowski

. (2005) School factors related to quality and equity: results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris.

26.

Noreisch

(2007) School catchment area evasion: the case of Berlin, Journal of Education Policy, 22, pp. 69–90.

27.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) ( 2001) Knowledge and skills for life: first results from PISA 2000. Programme for international student assessment, Executive summary. OECD, Paris.

28.

OECD (2010) PISA 2009 results. Vol. 5. Learning trends: changes in student performance since 2000. OECD, Paris.

29.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Willms

J. D.

(1995) The estimation of school effects, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, pp. 307–335.

30.

Reay

(2004) Exclusivity, exclusion, and social class in urban education markets in the United Kingdom, Urban Education, 39, pp. 537–560.

31.

Saporito

Lareau

(1999) School selection as a process: the multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice, Social Problems, 46(3), pp. 418–439.

32.

Sellstrom

Bremberg

(2006) Is there a ‘school effect’ on pupil outcomes? A review of multilevel studies, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, pp. 149–155.

33.

Seppanen

(2003) Patterns of ‘public-school markets’ in the Finnish comprehensive school from a comparative perspective, Journal of Education Policy, 18, pp. 513–531.

34.

Skolverket (2006) Equity trends in the Swedish school system: a quantitative analysis of variation in student performance and equity from a time perspective. English summary of Report No. 275 (Anders Auer). Swedish National Agency for Education, Stockholm.

35.

Statistics Sweden (2007) Barn, boendesegregation och skolresultat [Children, segregated housing and school results]. Demographic Report No. 2007:2.

36.

Subramanian

S. V.

(2004) The relevance of multilevel statistical models for identifying causal neighborhood effects, Social Science and Medicine, 58, pp. 1961–1967.

37.

Szulkin

Jonsson

J. O.

(2007) Ethnic segregation and educational outcomes in Swedish comprehensive schools: SULCIS, Stockholm University.

38.

Sykes

Musterd

(2010) Examining neighbourhood and school effects simultaneously: what does the Dutch evidence show?, Urban Studies, 48(7), pp. 1307–1331.

39.

Taylor

(2001) The geography of choice and diversity in the ‘new’ secondary education market of England, Area, 33, pp. 368–381.

40.

Werfhorst

H. G. V. D.

Mijs

J. J. B.

(2010) Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: a comparative perspective, Annual Review of Sociology, 36, pp. 407–428.