Five years after Katrina’s devastation, almost 90 per cent of New Orleans metropolitan population has returned. Recovery patterns, however, remain highly uneven. This paper examines the relationship between pre-existing demographic and housing conditions, damage from Hurricane Katrina, access to federal individual and housing assistance, and repopulation rates in the New Orleans metropolitan area. Findings shed light on the respective roles of pre-existing conditions, damage and assistance in shaping long-term recovery outcomes. In the case of Katrina, areas that have experienced the lowest repopulation rates had high levels of damage and received disproportionately low individual and housing assistance relative to damage. These areas are characterised by higher concentrations of minorities, low-income households and rental units than areas that experienced higher repopulation rates. Findings also highlight structural causes for the unevenness of recovery outcomes. The paper concludes with suggestions for a more effective and sustainable post-disaster assistance and recovery approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Disaster Recovery (2009) Deficiencies in federal disaster housing assistance after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and recommendations for improvement. Special Report, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Washington, DC, November.
2.
BatesL. (2006) Post Katrina housing: problems, policies, and prospects for African-Americans in New Orleans, The Black Scholar, 36(4), pp. 13–32.
BerkeP.CampanellaT. (2006) Planning for postdisaster resiliency, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), pp. 192–207.
5.
BerkeP. R.KartezJ.WengerD. (1993) Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity, Disasters, 17(2), pp. 93–109.
6.
BirklandT. (2009) Disasters, catastrophes, and policy failure in the homeland security era, Review of Policy Research, 26(4), pp. 423–438.
7.
BolinR.StanfordL. (1998) The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster. New York: Routledge.
8.
Brookings Institution and GNOCDC (Greater New Orleans Community Data Center) (2009) The New Orleans index. The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program and GNOCDC (http://www.gnocdc.org/).
9.
BullardR.WrightB. (2009) Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press.
10.
BurbyR. (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), pp. 171–191.
11.
BurnsP. F.ThomasM. O. (2008) A New Orleans? Understanding the role of history and the state–local relationship in the recovery process, Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(3), pp. 259–271.
12.
CampanellaR. (2007) An ethnic geography of New Orleans, The Journal of American History, 94, pp. 704–715.
Chamlee-WrightE.StorrV. (2008) The political economy of post-Katrina recovery: public choice style critiques from the Ninth Ward, New Orleans. Working Paper No. 08-32, Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
15.
ColtenC. (2008) Vulnerability and place: flat land and uneven risk in New Orleans, American Anthropologist, 108(4), pp. 731–734.
16.
ColtenC.KatesR.LaskaS. (2008) Community resilience: lessons from New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. Community and Regional Resilience Initiative, September (http://www.rwkates.org/pdfs/a2008.03.pdf).
17.
ComerioM. (1998) Disaster Hits Home: New Policy for Urban Housing Recovery. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18.
ComfortL. K. (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control, Public Administration Review, 67(s1), pp. 189–197.
19.
ComfortL. K.BirklandT. A.CiglerB. A.NanceE. (2010) Retrospectives and prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: five years and counting, Public Administration Review, 70(5), pp. 669–678.
20.
ComfortL. K.WisnerB.CutterS.PulwartyR.. (1999) Reframing disaster policy: the global evolution of vulnerable communities, Environmental Hazards, 1(1), pp. 39–44.
21.
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (2006) Hurricane Katrina: a nation still unprepared. Special Report No. 109-322, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 109th Congress, 2nd Session.
22.
CutterS.EmrichC.MitchellJ.BoruffB.. (2006) Road Home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina, Environment, 49(2), pp. 10–20.
FischerW.SardB. (2006) Housing needs of many low-income hurricane evacuees are not being adequately addressed. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC, 27February.
30.
FussellE. (2007) Constructing New Orleans, constructing race: population history of New Orleans, The Journal of American History, 94(3), pp. 846–855.
31.
GabeT.FalkG.McartyM.MasonV. W. (2005) Hurricane Katrina: social-demographic characteristics of impacted areas. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Washington, DC (http://www.gnocdc.org/reports/crsrept.pdf).
32.
GavinA. (2008) Reading Katrina: race, space and an unnatural disaster, New Political Science, 30(3), pp. 325–346.
33.
GirardC.PeacockW. G. (1997) Ethnicity and segregation: post-hurricane relocation, in: PeacockW. G.MorrowB. H.GaldwinH. (Eds) Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Race, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, pp. 191–205. New York: Routledge.
34.
GNOCDC (Greater New Orleans Community Data Center) (2008) Road Home grants homeowner projects by zip code. GNOCDC, New Orleans, LA.
35.
GNOCDC (2010a) Analysis of USPS delivery statistics product. HHDsReceivingMailbyZIP.xls. GNOCDC, New Orleans, LA.
36.
GNOCDC (2010b) Road Home. RepopulationDataJun10.xls. Data driven by Valassis Lists from a compilation by GNOCDC, New Orleans, LA.
37.
GreenR.BatesL.SmythA. (2007) Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ Upper and Lower Ninth Ward: one year after Hurricane Katrina, Disasters, 31(4), pp. 311–335.
HartmanC.SquiresG. (2006) There Is No Such Thing As a Natural Disaster: Race, Class, and Hurricane Katrina. New York: Routledge.
43.
HewittK. (1998) Excluded perspectives in the social construction of disaster, in: QuarantelliE. L. (Ed.) What Is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question, pp. 75–91. New York: Routledge.
44.
KamelN.Loukaitou-SiderisA. (2004) Residential assistance and recovery following the Northridge earthquake, Urban Studies, 41(3), pp. 533–562.
45.
KatesR. W.ColtenC. E.LaskaS.LeathermanS. P. (2007) Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 9(3), pp. 5–22.
46.
KleinN. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
LoganJ. (2009) Unnatural disaster: social impacts and policy choices after Katrina, in: BullardR.WrightB. (Eds) Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, pp. 249–264. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press.
Louisiana Recovery Authority (2008c) Road Home grants and homeowner projects by zip code. Last update, State of Louisiana, 23August.
53.
Louisiana Recovery Authority (2009a) Small rental property program: incentive operations status report. Housing and Development Services, Inc., 7December.
LuftR. E.GriffinS. (2008) A status report on housing in New Orleans after Katrina: an intersectional analysis, in: WillingerB. (Ed.) Katrina and the Women of New Orleans, pp. 50–53. Newcomb College Center for Research on Women, Tulane University, and the Center for Hazards Assessment, Response and Technology, University of New Orleans.
56.
MarableM.ClarkeK. (2008) Seeking Higher Ground: The Hurricane Katrina Crisis, Race, and Public Policy Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
MartelC. (2007) Bring it on home: a Gulf Coast Marshall Plan based on international humanitarian standards, Vermont Law Review, 32(1), pp. 57–128.
58.
McCarthyF. (2007) FEMA disaster housing and Hurricane Katrina: overview, analysis, and congressional options. Government and Finance Division, Washington, DC, 16July (http://ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/08July/RL34087.pdf).
59.
McCarthyK.PetersonD. J.SastryN.PollardM. (2006) The repopulation of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Technical report, Rand Gulf States Policy Institute, Santa Monica, CA.
60.
MenzelD. (2006) The Katrina aftermath: a failure of federalism or leadership?, Public Administration Review, 66(2), pp. 808–812.
61.
MorrisJ. (2008) Out of New Orleans: race, class, and researching the Katrina diaspora, Urban Education, 43(4), pp. 463–487.
OIG (Office of Inspector General) (2006) A performance review of FEMA’s disaster management activities in response to hurricane Katrina. Office of Inspections and Special Reviews, US Department of Homeland Security, March.
64.
OlshanskyR.JohnsonL.HorneJ.NeeB. (2006) Planning after Hurricane Katrina, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(2), pp. 147–153.
65.
OlshanskyR.JohnsonL.HorneJ.NeeB. (2008) Planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans, Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), pp. 273–287.
66.
PeacockW. G.MorrowB. H.GladwinJ. (1997) Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Race, Gender, and the Sociology. New York: Routledge.
67.
PerryR.QuarantelliE. L. (Eds) (2005) What Is a Disaster? New Answers To Old Questions. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Books.
68.
PotterH. (2007) Racing the Storm: Racial Implications and Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
69.
RhodesJ. (2010) Managing the parameters of visibility: the revelations of Katrina, Urban Studies, 47(10), pp. 2051–2068.
70.
SRA International Inc. (2006) FEMA Recovery Division 2005 hurricane season after-action report. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Recovery Division, US Department of Homeland Security, Arlington, June.
71.
State of Louisiana (2006–2010) The Homeowner Assistance Program: weekly situation and pipeline report. Division of Administration, Office of Community Development, Baton Rouge, LA.
72.
StehrS. (2006) The political economy of urban disaster assistance, Urban Affairs Review, 41(4), pp. 492–500.
US Government Accountability Office (2010) Disaster assistance: federal assistance for permanent housing primarily benefited homeowners; opportunities exist to better target rental housing needs. Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington, DC.
