By Community or Design? Age-restricted Neighbourhoods,Physical Design and Baby Boomers’ Local Travel Behaviour in Suburban Boston,US

Abstract

This article analyses the travel behaviour, residential choices and related preferences of 55+ baby boomers in suburban Boston, USA, looking specifically at age-restricted neighbourhoods. For this highly auto-dependent group, do neighbourhood-related characteristics influence local-level recreational walk/bike and social activity trip-making? The analysis aims to discern community (for example, social network) versus physical (for example, street network) influences. Structural equation models, incorporating attitudes and residential choice, are used to control for self-selection and to account for direct and indirect effects among exogenous and endogenous variables. The analysis reveals modest neighbourhood effects. Living in age-restricted, as opposed to unrestricted, suburban neighbourhoods modestly increases the likelihood of residents being active (i.e. making at least one local recreational walk/bike trip) and the number of local social trips. Overall, the age-restricted community status has greater influence on recreational and social activity trip-making than the neighbourhood physical characteristics, although some community–neighbourhood interaction exists.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abreu

Golob

Goulias

(2006) Effects of land use characteristics on residence and employment location and travel behavior of urban adult workers, Transportation Research Record, 1977, pp. 121–131.

Ahrentzen

(2010) On their own turf: community design and active aging in a naturally occurring retirement community, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 24(3/4), pp. 267–290.

Alfonzo

Boarnet

Day

Mcmillan

. (2008) The relationship of neighbourhood built environment features and adult parents’ walking, Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), pp. 29–51.

Bagley

M. N.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

(2002) The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach, The Annals of Regional Science, 36, pp. 279–297.

Baran

Rodríguez

Khattak

(2008) Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighborhoods, Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), pp. 5–28.

Ben-Akiva

Walker

Bernardino

A. T.

Gopinath

D. A.

. (2002) Integration of choice and latent variable models, in: Mahmassani

(Ed.) In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, ch. 21. Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon.

Berke

E. M.

Gottlieb

L. M.

Moudon

A. V.

Larson

E. B.

(2007a) Protective association between neighborhood walkability and depression in older men, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, pp. 526–533.

Berke

E. M.

Koepsell

T. D.

Moudon

A. V.

Hoskins

R. E.

. (2007b) Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons, American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), pp. 486–492.

Blechman

(2008) Leisureville: Adventures in America’s Retirement Utopias. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

10.

Cao

Mokhtarian

Handy

(2009) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings, Transport Reviews, 29(3), pp. 359–395.

11.

Cao

Handy

Mokhtarian

(2006) The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX, Transportation, 33(1), pp. 1–20.

12.

Cao

Mokhtarian

Handy

(2010) Neighborhood design and the accessibility of the elderly: an empirical analysis in north California, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4, pp. 347–371.

13.

Champion

A. G.

(2001) A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations, Urban Studies, 38(4), pp. 657–677.

14.

Chapman

N. J.

Beaudet

(1983) Environmental predictors of well-being for at-risk older adults in a mid-sized city, Journal of Gerontology, 38(2), pp. 237–244.

15.

Chaskin

R. J.

(1995) Defining neighborhood: history, theory, and practice. The Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.

16.

Coughlin

(2007) Disruptive demographics, design, and the future of everyday environments, Design Management Review, 18(2), pp. 53–59.

17.

CTPS (Central Transportation Planning Staff) (1993) 1991 household travel survey. Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, Boston, MA.

18.

Cvitkovich

Wister

(2001) The importance of transportation and prioritization of environmental needs to sustain well-being among older adults, Environment and Behavior, 33(6), pp. 809–829.

19.

DiPietro

(2001) Physical activity in aging: changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function, Journal of Gerontology A, 56(2), pp. 13–22.

20.

Emrath

Liu

H. F.

(2007) The age-qualified active adult housing market. National Association of Home Builders, Washington, DC.

21.

Ewing

Handy

(2009) Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability, Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), pp. 65–84.

22.

Eyler

Brownson

Bacak

Housemann

(2003) Epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35(9), pp. 1529–1536.

23.

Flynn

T. E.

Boenau

A. E.

(2007) Trip generation characteristics of age-restricted housing, ITE Journal, 77(2), pp. 30–37.

24.

Giles-Corti

Donovan

(2002) The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity, Social Science & Medicine, 54(12), pp. 1793–1812.

25.

Giles-Corti

Broomhall

Knuiman

Collins

. (2005) Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), pp. 169–176.

26.

Golob

(2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research, Transportation Research Part B, 37(1), pp. 1–25.

27.

Grant

Mittelsteadt

(2004) Types of gated communities, Environment and Planning B, 31, pp. 913–930.

28.

Harris Interactive (2005) Pulte Homes Baby Boomer Study. Harris Interactive (http://www.icaa.cc/1-Organizationalmember/member_research/viewsonaging/Delwebb2005survey.pdf).

29.

Hebbert

(2008) Local travel habits of baby boomers in suburban age-restricted communities. MA thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

30.

Heudorfer

(2005) Age restricted active adult housing in Massachusetts, Boston MA. Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association, June ( http://www.chapa.org/sites/default/files/f_122952789640BUpdateDec2008_4.pdf ).

31.

Hunt

M. E.

Gunter-Hunt

(1985) Naturally occurring retirement communities, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 3(3/4), pp. 3–22.

32.

Huston

Evenson

Bors

Gizlice

(2003) Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population, American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, pp. 158–169.

33.

Jones

A. J.

(2005) Applied econometrics for health economists: a practical guide, 2nd edn. Prepared for the Office of Health Economics, London (http://www.york.ac.uk/res/herc/teach/OHE-Booklet.pdf).

34.

Joseph

Zimring

(2007) Where active older adults walk: understanding the factors related to path choice for walking among active retirement community residents, Environment and Behavior, 39(1), pp. 75–105.

35.

Kennedy

D. J.

Coates

(2008) Retirement village resident satisfaction in Australia: a qualitative enquiry, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 22(4), pp. 311–334.

36.

King

Brach

Belle

Killingsworth

. (2003) The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women, American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), pp. 74–82.

37.

Kweon

B.-S.

Sullivan

Wiley

(1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults, Environment and Behavior, 30(6), pp. 832–858.

38.

Lawton

M. P.

Nahemow

Teaff

(1975) Housing characteristics and the well-being of elderly tenants in federally assisted housing, Journal of Gerontology, 30(5), pp. 601–607.

39.

Lee

Moudon

A. V.

(2006) Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes, Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(S1), pp. S77–S98.

40.

Maat

Wee

B. van

Stead

(2005) Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories, Environment and Planning B, 32, pp. 33–46.

41.

Manski

Lerman

(1977) The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples, Econometrica, 45(8), pp. 1977–1988.

42.

Mokhtarian

Cao

(2008) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies, Transportation Research B, 42(3), pp. 204–228.

43.

Moudon

A. V.

Lee

Cheadle

Garvin

. (2005) Operational definition of walkable neighborhood, Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(S1), pp. S99–S117.

44.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2004) Mplus Technical Appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

45.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2007) Mplus User’s Guide, 5th edn. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

46.

Nagel

Carlson

Bosworth

Michael

(2008) The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults, American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(4), pp. 461–468.

47.

Owen

Humpel

Leslie

Bauman

. (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), pp. 67–76.

48.

Phillipson

Leach

Money

Biggs

(2008) Social and cultural constructions of ageing: the case of the baby boomers, Sociological Research Online, 13(3)5 ( http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/3/5.html ).

49.

Rodriguez

Khattak

Kelly

(2006) Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? Comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), pp. 43–54.

50.

Rosenbloom

(2003) The mobility needs of older Americans: implications for transportation reauthorization. Transportation Reform Series, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

51.

Saelens

Sallis

(2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation, American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), pp. 1552–1558.

52.

Sallis

Owen

(1996) Ecological models, in: Glanz

Rimer

B. K.

Lewis

F. M.

(Eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2nd edn, pp. 403–424. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

53.

Schmöcker

J.-D.

Quddus

M. A.

Noland

R. B.

Bell

M. G. H.

(2005) Estimating trip generation of elderly and disabled people: analysis of London data, Transportation Research Record, no. 1924, pp. 9–18.

54.

US Census Bureau (2002) Census 2000 summary file 2 - geographic area: Boston–Worcester–Lawrence, MA–NH–ME–CT CMSA ( http://library.case.edu/media/kelvinsmithlibrary/census/sf2techdoc.pdf ).

55.

US DOT (US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration) (2009) 2009 national household travel survey ( http://nhts.ornl.gov ).

56.

Wachs

(1979) Transportation for the Elderly: Changing Lifestyles, Changing Needs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

57.

Wellman

(2005) Community: from neighborhood to network, Communications of the ACM, 48(10), pp. 53–55.

58.

Wister

(2005) Baby Boomer Health Dynamics: How Are We Aging? Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

59.

Wretstrand

Svensson

Fristedt

Falkmer

(2009) Older people and local public transit: mobility effects of accessibility improvements in Sweden, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2(2), pp. 49–65.

60.

Yang

H.-Y.

Stark

S. L.

(2010) The role of environmental features in social engagement among residents living in assisted living facilities, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 24(1), pp. 28–43.