The municipal political decision-making dynamic has typically been studied in regard to the provision of locally public goods and services whose benefits, while diffuse, are tied to a particular geography. This research extends current knowledge by empirically examining the local production of a global public good: climate protection. It utilises an original nation-wide dataset on the greenhouse gas-reducing activities that have been implemented by city governments in the US. These data enable the development of a more comprehensive measure of local climate protection than has been used in previous quantitative research. Several theories of local political decision-making are tested to determine the factors that influence the extent of municipal involvement in climate-protecting activities. Results suggest that local governments’ fiscal and human capacities are key determinants of involvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Betsill M..Mitigating climate change in U.S. cities: opportunities and obstacles.Local Environment. 2001;6 (4): 393-406
2.
Brody S. D.,Zahran S.,Vedlitz A.,Grover H..Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States.Environment and Behavior. 2008;40 (1): 72-95
3.
Bulkeley H.,Betsill M.Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge; 2003:
4.
Bulkeley H.,Schroeder H.,Janda K.,Zhao J., et al.Cities and climate change: the role of institutions, governance and urban planning.
Paper presented at the World Bank Urban Symposium on Climate Change; 2009Marseille; 2009. .
5.
Clingermayer J. C.,Feiock R. C.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2001:
6.
Feiock R. C.,West J..Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: municipal solid waste recycling programs.Political Research Quarterly. 1993;46 (2): 399-419
7.
Gray V.,Lowery D.The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1996:
8.
Gujarati D.Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2003:
9.
Hanna K. S..Planning for sustainability: experiences in two contrasting communities.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005;71:27-40
10.
Honadle B. W..Theoretical and practical issues of local government capacity in an era of devolution.The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy. 2001;31 (1): 77-90
11.
ICLEI USA (2009) Creating climate prosperity, ICLEI e-news, Issue 18 (www.iclei.org/index.php?id=9427; accessed 12 December 2010).
12.
Kellstedt P. M.,Zahran S.,Vedlitz A..Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States.Risk Analysis. 2008;28 (1): 113-126
13.
Kinsey B. S.,Bartling H.,Peterson A. F.,Baybeck B. P..Location of public goods and the calculus of voting: the Seattle monorail referendum.Social Science Quarterly. 2010;91 (3): 741-761
14.
Krause R. M..An assessment of the greenhouse gas reducing activities being implemented in U.S. cities.Local Environment. 2011a;16 (2): 193-211
15.
Krause R. M..Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2011b;33 (1): 45-60
16.
Krause R. M..Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection.Environment and Planning C. 2011c;29 (1): 46-62
17.
Lane B. W..Significant characteristics of the urban rail renaissance in the United States: a discriminant analysis.Transportation Research Part A. 2008;42 (2): 279-295
18.
Lineberry R. L.,Fowler E. P..Reformism and public policies in American cities.American Political Science Review. 1967;61:701-716
19.
Lubell M.,Feiock R. C.,Handy S..City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California’s Central Valley.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2009;75 (3): 293-308
20.
Lubell M.,Feiock R. C.,Ramirez E..Political institutions and conservation by local governments.Urban Affairs Review. 2005;40 (6): 706-729
21.
Mendelsohn R.,Dinar A.,Williams L..The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries.Environment and Development Economics. 2006;11:159-178
22.
Molotch H..The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place.The American Journal of Sociology. 1976;82 (2): 309-332
23.
Nownes A. J.,Neeley G..Public interest group entrepreneurship and theories of group mobility.Political Research Quarterly. 1996;49 (1): 119-146
24.
Peterson P. E.The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press; 1995:
25.
Portney K. E.Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2003:
26.
Rabe B. G.Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press; 2004:
27.
Rothenberg L. S.Environmental Choices: Policy Responses to Green Demands. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2002:
28.
Schneider M.,Teske P..Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government.The American Political Science Review. 1992;86 (3): 737-747
29.
Sharp E. B.,Daley D. M.,Lynch M. S..Understanding local adoption and implementation of climate change mitigation policy.Urban Affairs Review. 2011;47 (3): 433-457
30.
Shipan C. R.,Volden C..The mechanisms of policy diffusion.American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52 (4): 840-857
31.
SippelM.JenssenT. (2009) What about local climate governance? A review of promise and problems. MPRA paper, Social Science Research Network (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20987/1/MPRA_paper_20987.pdf).
32.
Stone C. N..Systemic power in community decision making: a restatement of stratification theory.The American Political Science Review. 1980;74 (4): 978-990
33.
Stone C. N..Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach.Journal of Urban Affairs. 1993;15 (1): 1-28
34.
Tierney K. J.,Lindell M. K.,Perry R. W.Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press; 2001:
35.
Verba S.,Schlozman K. L.,Brady H.,Nie N. H..Race, ethnicity and political resources: participation in the United States.British Journal of Political Science. 1993;23:453-497
36.
Walker J. L..The diffusion of innovations among the American states.American Political Science Review. 1969;63:880-899
37.
Wheeler S. M..State and municipal climate change plams: the first generation.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2008;74:481-496
38.
Zahran S.,Grover H.,Brody S. D.,Vedlitz A..Risk, stress and capacity: explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection.Urban Affairs Review. 2008;43:447-474
39.
Zahran S.,Brody S. D.,Vedlitz A.,Grover H., et al.Vulnerability and capacity: explaining local commitment to climate-change policy.Environment and Planning C. 2008;26:544-562
