‘Urban sustainability’ currently receives widespread and generally enthusiastic endorsement, yet concerns are emerging that recent expressions of the concept may actually be working against the city and its residents. Based on research in Christchurch, New Zealand (one of the most urbanised countries in the world), it is argued that the assimilation of social, economic and bio-physical environmental elements that gave the idea much of its original legitimacy has been reduced to a minimalist set of material and discursive ‘eco-friendly’ denominators. As a result, only occasional glimpses of the city and its human inhabitants are caught in attempts to operationalise sustainability in urban areas. The effect is that cities, in New Zealand at least, are less liveable and less likeable than they should be. It is suggested that there is a real need to re-urbanise and rehumanise the urban sustainability agenda as a means of realising its integrative and transformative potential.
AgyemanJ.AngusB. (2003) The role of civic environmentalism in the pursuit of sustainable communities, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(3), pp. 345–363.
3.
AgyemanJ.EvansT. (2003) Towards just sustainability in urban communities: building equity rights with sustainable solutions, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590, pp. 35–53.
4.
AgyemanJ.BullardR.EvansB. (2002) Exploring the nexus: bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity, Space and Polity, 6(1), pp. 70–90.
5.
AminA. (2007) Re-thinking the urban social, City, 11, pp. 100–114.
6.
BonnesM.UzzellD.CarrusG.KelayT. (2007) Inhabitants’ and experts’ assessments of environmental quality for urban sustainability, Journal of Social Issues, 63, pp. 59–78.
7.
BooneC.ModarresA. (2006) City and Environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
8.
BraunB. (2006) Environmental issues: global natures in the space of assemblage, Progress in Human Geography, 30, pp. 644–654.
9.
BrennerN. (2009) What is critical urban theory?, City, 13(2/3), pp. 195–207.
10.
BulkeleyH. (2006) Urban sustainability: learning from best practice?, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 1029–1044.
11.
CapekS. (2010) Foregrounding nature: an invitation to think about shifting nature–city boundaries, City & Community, 9(2), pp. 208–224.
12.
ClarkT.LloydR.WongK.JainP. (2002) Amenities drive urban growth, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, pp. 493–515.
13.
CrabtreeL. (2006) Sustainability begins at home: an ecological exploration of sub/urban Australian community-focused housing initiatives, Geoforum, 37, pp. 519–535.
14.
DixonJ.DupuisA. (2003) Urban intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: a challenge for new urbanism, Housing Studies, 18(3), pp. 353–368.
15.
EricksenN.BerkeP.CrawfordJ.DixonJ. (2003) Planning for sustainability: New Zealand under the RMA. International Global Change Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton.
16.
EskelandG.FeyziogluT. (1997) Rationing can backfire: the day without a car, World Bank Economic Review, 11, pp. 383–408.
17.
EvansR.MarvinS. (2006) Researching the sustainable city: three modes of interdisciplinarity, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 1009–1028.
18.
FloridaR. (2003) The Rise of the Creative Class and How it is Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Christchurch, New Zealand: Hazard Press.
19.
FreemanC. (2004) Sustainable development from rhetoric to practice? A New Zealand perspective, International Planning Studies, 9, pp. 307–326.
20.
GarlingT.SchuitemaG. (2007) Travel demand management targeting reduced car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility, Journal of Social Issues, 63, pp. 139–153.
21.
HannaK.Walton-RobertsM. (2004) Quality of place and the rescaling of urban governance: the case of Toronto, Journal of Canadian Studies, 38, pp. 37–67.
22.
HarnerJ.WarnerK.PierceJ.HuberT. (2002) Urban environmental justice indices, The Professional Geographer, 54(3), pp. 318–331.
23.
HeadL.MuirP. (2006) Suburban life and the boundaries of nature: resilience and rupture in Australian backyard gardens, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, pp. 505–524.
24.
HinchliffeS.KearnesM. B.DegenM.WhatmoreS. (2005) Urban wild things: a cosmopolitical experiment, Environment and Planning D, 23, pp. 643–658.
25.
KruegerR.AgyemanJ. (2005) Sustainability schizophrenia or ‘actually existing sustainabilities’? Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US, Geoforum, 36(4), pp. 410–417.
26.
LathamA. (2003) Urbanity, lifestyle and making sense of the new urban cultural economy: notes from Auckland, New Zealand, Urban Studies, 40(9), pp. 1699–1724.
27.
LatourB. (1998) To modernise or ecologise? That is the question, in: BraunB.CastreeN. (Eds) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium, pp. 221–242. Oxford: Routledge.
28.
LefebvreH. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
29.
McCannE. (2002) The cultural politics of local economic development: meaning-making, place-making, and the urban policy process, Geoforum, 33, pp. 385–398.
30.
McDonaldA.LaneS. N.HaycockN. E.ChalkE. A. (2004) Rivers of dreams: on the gulf between theoretical and practical aspects of an upland river restoration, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, pp. 257–281.
31.
MemonA.PerkinsH. C. (2000) Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
32.
MemonA.ThomasG. (2006) New Zealand’s new Local Government Act: a paradigm for participatory planning or business as usual?, Urban Policy and Research, 24, pp. 135–144.
33.
MercerD.JotkowitzB. (2000) Local Agenda 21 and barriers to sustainability at the local government level in Victoria, Australia. Australian Geographer, 31, pp. 163–182.
34.
MerrifieldA. (2005) Metropolitan birth pangs: reflections on Lefebvre’s The Urban Revolution, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, pp. 693–702.
35.
MfE (Ministry for the Environment) (2005a) Simply sustainable. MfE, Wellington, New Zealand.
36.
MfE (2005b) Urban design protocol. MfE, Wellington, New Zealand.
37.
MolotchH. (1976) The city as a growth machine: towards a political economy of place, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 309–332.
38.
MumfordL. (1937/1996) What is a city?, in: Le GatesR.StoutM. (Eds) The City Reader, pp. 184–186. London: Routledge.
39.
MurdochJ.LoweP. (2003) The preservationist paradox: modernism, environmentalism and the politics of spatial division, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, pp. 318–332.
40.
NeumanM. (2005) The compact city fallacy, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, pp. 11–26.
41.
ParrA. (2009) Hijacking Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
PearceJ.KinghamS.Zawar-RezaP. (2006) Every breath you take? Environmental justice and air pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 919–938.
43.
PeckJ. (2005) Struggling with the creative class, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, pp. 740–770.
44.
PerkinsH. C.ThornsD. (1999) House and home and their interaction with changes in New Zealand’s urban system, Housing, Theory and Society, 16, pp. 124–135.
45.
PerkinsH. C.ThornsD. (2001a) Houses, homes and New Zealanders’ everyday lives, in: BellC. (Ed.) The Sociology of Everyday Life in New Zealand, pp. 30–51. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
46.
PerkinsH. C.ThornsD. (2001b) A decade on: reflections on the Resource Management Act 1991 and the practice of urban planning in New Zealand, Environment and Planning B, 28, pp. 639–654.
ReesR.WackernagelM. (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are key to sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 223–248.
49.
ReesW. E. (1997) Ecological footprints: the biophysical factor in urban sustainability, Ekistics, 64, pp. 171–181.
SonerydL. (2004) Hearing as a way of dwelling: the active sense-making of environmental risk and nuisance, Environment and Planning D, 22, pp. 737–753.
52.
StoneM. (2003) Is sustainability for development anthropologists?, Human Organisation, 62, pp. 93–99.
53.
SwyngedouwE. (2009) The antinomies of the postpolitical city: in search of a democratic politics of environmental production, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, pp. 601–620.
54.
ThomasS.MemonA. (2007) New Zealand local government at the crossroads? Reflections on recent local government reforms, Urban Policy Research, 25, pp. 171–185.
55.
ThornsD. (2002) The Transformation of Cities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
VallanceS.PerkinsH. (2010) Is another city possible? Towards an urbanised sustainability, City, 14, pp. 448–456.
57.
VallanceS.PerkinsH. C.MooreK. (2005) The results of making a city more compact: neighbours’ interpretation of urban infill, Environment and Planning B, 32, pp. 715–733.
58.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
WelchR. (2003) Lessons from the international debate, in: FreemanC.Thompson-FawcettM. (Eds) Living Space: Towards Sustainable Settlements in New Zealand, pp. 23–32. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
60.
WhiteheadM. (2003) (Re)analysing the sustainable city: nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 1183–1206.
61.
WhiteheadM. (2005) Between the marvellous and the mundane: everyday life in the socialist city and the politics of the environment, Environment and Planning D, 23, pp. 273–294.
62.
WolchJ. (2007) Green urban worlds, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, pp. 373–384.
