The new urban politics (NUP) literature has helped to draw attention to a new generation of entrepreneurial urban regimes involved in the competition to attract investment to cities. Interurban competition often had negative environmental consequences for the urban living place. Yet knowledge of the environment was not very central to understanding the NUP. Entrepreneurial urban regimes today are struggling to deal with climate change and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon reduction strategies could have profound implications for interurban competition and the politics of urban development. This paper explores the rise of a distinctive low-carbon urban polity—carbon control—and examines its potential ramifications for a new environmental politics of urban development (NEPUD). The NEPUD signals the growing centrality of carbon control in discourses, strategies and struggles around urban development. Using examples from cities in the US and Europe, the paper examines how these new environmental policy considerations are being mainstreamed in urban development politics. Alongside competitiveness, the management of carbon emissions represents a new yet at the same time contestable mode of calculation in urban governance.
Chicago Climate Action Plan (2008) Climate change and Chicago: projections and potential impacts (summary of final report) (http://www.chicagoclimateaction.org/; accessed 1 December 2008).
CoxK. R. (1993) The local and the global in the new urban politics: a critical view, Environment and Planning D, 11, pp. 433–448.
8.
CoxK. R. (1999) Ideology and the growth coalition, in: JonasA. E. G.WilsonD. (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later, pp. 21–36. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
9.
CoxK. R.JonasA. E. G. (1993) Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation, Political Geography, 12, pp. 8–37.
10.
CoxK. R.MairA. J. (1988) Locality and community in the politics of local economic development, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, pp. 307–325.
11.
Deutsche Bank (2008) Economic stimulus: the case for ‘green’ infrastructure, energy security and ‘green’ jobs. Deutsche Bank: Chicago, IL.
12.
DG REGIO (2009) Regions 2020: the climate change challenge for European regions. Working Document No. SEC(2008) 2868 Final, Background document to Commission Staff, DG REGIO, Brussels.
13.
DierwechterY. (2008) Urban Growth Management and Its Discontents: Promises, Practices, and Geopolitics in U.S. City-regions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DierwechterY. (2010) Metropolitan geographies of US climate action: cities, suburbs, and the local divide in global responsibilities, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12, pp. 59–82.
15.
GibbsD. C.JonasA. E. G. (2000) Governance and regulation in local environmental policy: the utility of a regime approach, Geoforum, 31, pp. 299–313.
GrahamS. (2002) Flowcity: networked mobilities and the contemporary metropolis, Journal of Urban Technology, 9, pp. 1–20.
18.
GrahamS.MarvinS. (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
19.
Green New Deal Group (2008) A green new deal. New Economics Foundation, London.
20.
HackworthJ. (2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
HarveyD. W. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban politics in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler, 71, pp. 3–18.
22.
HarveyD. W. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
HendersonJ. (2004) The politics of mobility and business elites in Atlanta, Georgia, Urban Geography, 25, pp. 193–216.
24.
HeynenN. (2006) Green political ecologies: towards a better understanding of inner-city environmental change, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 499–516.
25.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2009) ‘Urban ecological security’: a new urban paradigm?, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, pp. 193–215.
26.
JessopB. (1997) A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance, in: LauriaM. (Ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 51–73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
JessopB.PeckJ. A.TickellA. (1999) Retooling the machine: economic crisis, state restructuring, and urban politics, in: JonasA. E. G.WilsonD. (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later, pp. 141–159. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
28.
JonasA. E. G.McCarthyL. (2009) Urban management and regeneration in the United States: state intervention or redevelopment at all costs?, Local Government Studies, 35, pp. 299–314.
29.
JonasA. E. G.WardK. (2007) Introduction to a debate on city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, pp. 169–178.
30.
JonasA. E. G.WhileA. (2007) Greening the entrepreneurial city: looking for spaces of sustainability politics in the competitive city, in: KruegerR.GibbsD. C. (Eds) The Sustainable Development Paradox, pp. 123–159. New York: Guilford.
31.
JonasA. E. G.WilsonD. (Eds) (1999) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
32.
JonasA. E. G.PincetlS.SullivanJ. (forthcoming) Endangered neoliberal suburbanism? The use of the Federal Endangered Species Act as a growth management tool in Southern California, Urban Studies.
33.
KeilR. (2007) Sustaining modernity, modernizing nature: the environmental crisis and the survival of capitalism, in: KruegerR.GibbsD. (Eds) The Sustainable Development Paradox, pp. 41–65. New York: Guilford.
34.
KeilR.GrahamJ. (1998) Reasserting nature: constructing urban environments after-Fordism, in: BraunB.CastreeN. (Eds) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Turn of the Millennium, pp. 100–125. London: Routledge.
35.
KruegerR.GibbsD. C. (Eds) (2007) The Sustainable Development Paradox. New York: Guilford.
36.
LakeR. W. (2000) Contradictions at the local scale: local implementation of Agenda 21 in the USA, in: LowN.GleesonB.ElanderI.LidskogR. (Eds) Consuming Cities: The Urban Environment in the Global Economy after the Rio Declaration, pp. 70–90. London: Routledge.
37.
LauriaM. (Ed.) (1997) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
LerchD. (2008) Post Carbon Cities: Planning for Energy and Climate Uncertainty. Sebastopol, CA: Post Carbon Press.
39.
LoganJ.MolotchH. L. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
MasseyD. (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place, in: BirdJ.CurtisB.PutnamT.. (Eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, pp. 59–69. London: Routledge.
41.
McCannE.WardK. (Eds) (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in a Global Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
McManusP. (2004) Vortex Cities to Sustainable Cities: Australia’s Urban Challenge. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press.
43.
MeadowcroftJ. (2005) From welfare state to ecostate?, in: BarryJ.EckersleyR. (Eds) The State and the Global Ecological Crisis, pp. 3–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
MolotchH. L. (1976) The city as a growth machine: towards a political economy of place, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 309–331.
45.
NewmanP.BeatleyT.BoyerH. (2009) Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
46.
NorthP. (2010) Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change: a sympathetic critique, Geoforum, 41, pp. 585–594.
47.
O’ConnorJ. (1998) Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
48.
RamseyK. (2009) Adapting (to) the Climate Crisis: Urban Environmental Governance and the Politics of Mobility in Seattle. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
49.
RiceJ. L. (2010) Climate, carbon, and territory: greenhouse gas mitigation in Seattle, Washington, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, pp. 929–937.
ShortJ. (1999) Urban imagineers: boosterism and the representation of cities, in: JonasA. E. G.WilsonD. (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later, pp. 37–54. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
54.
SmithN. (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.
StoneC. N. (1989) Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
57.
StoneC. N. (1993) Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach, Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, pp. 1–28.
58.
Sustainable Development Commission (2009) A sustainable new deal. SDC, London.
59.
SwyngedouwE. (1996) The city as a hybrid: on nature, society and cyborg urbanization, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 7, pp. 65–80.
60.
SwyngedouwE. (2007) Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the post-political condition, in: KruegerR.GibbsD. C. (Eds) The Sustainable Development Paradox, pp. 13–40. New York: Guilford.
61.
TieboutC. M. (1955) A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416–424.
62.
United Nations Environment Programme (2008) Green jobs: towards decent work in a sustainable, low-carbon world. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.
63.
UnruhG. C. (2008) Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, pp. 817–830.
64.
WalkerR. A.LargeB. (1975) The ecology of energy extravagance, Ecology Law Quarterly, 4, pp. 963–985.
65.
WhileA. H.JonasA. E. G.GibbsD. C. (2004) The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for a ‘sustainability fix’ in Leeds and Manchester, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, pp. 549–569.
66.
WhileA. H.JonasA. E. G.GibbsD. C. (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: the eco-restructuring of the state and the politics of local and regional development, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, pp. 76–93.
67.
WhiteG.GardnerN.SwiftJ. (2008) Carbon reduction: obligation and opportunity at regional and local levels, Local Economy, 23, pp. 235–241.
