Contingent workers are a large and increasingly important segment of the US labour force. This paper uses the Contingent Work Supplement of the Current Population Survey to gain some understanding of this workforce and to link that information to larger on-going annual and decennial surveys for sub-national-level estimation and analysis. A typology is developed of the non-standard workforce based on their work arrangement and the industries in which they concentrate; with four types of worker: contingent core, standard workers in contingent industries, non-standard workers in traditional industries, and traditional workers. The state of Georgia is used as an example of a regional economy that has experienced much economic growth in recent years and possibly a surge in contingent workforce as well. Characterising these workers by demographic and economic characteristics demonstrates much diversity across these four groups. Possible policy implications on employment quality and economic development are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.AdlerP. (2004) Paradise Laborers: Hotel Work in the Global Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
BelmanD.GoldenL. (2000) Nonstandard and contingent employment: contrasts by job type, industry, and occupation, in: CarréF.FerberM.HerzenbergS. (Eds) Nonstandard work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, pp. 167–212. Champaigne, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
3.
BelousR. S. (1989a) The contingent economy: the growth of the temporary, part-time and subcontracted workforce. National Planning Association, Washington, DC.
4.
BelousR. S. (1989b) How human resource systems adjust to the shift toward contingent workers, Monthly Labor Review, 112, pp. 7–12.
5.
BendapudiV.MangumS.TanskyJ.FisherM. (2003) Nonstandard employment arrangements: a proposed typology and policy planning framework, Human Resource Planning, 26(1), pp. 24–41.
CarnoyM.CastellsM.BennerC. (1997) Labour markets and employment practices in the age of flexibility: a case study of Silicon Valley, International Labour Review, 136(1), pp. 27–48.
8.
CarréF.FerberM. A.GoldenL.HerzenbergS. A. (2000) Introduction, in: CarréF.FerberM. A.GoldenL.HerzenbergS. A. (Eds) Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, pp. 1–20. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
9.
CatanzariteL. (2000) Brown-collar jobs: occupational segregation and earnings of recent-immigrant Latinos, Sociological Perspectives, 43(1), pp. 45–75.
10.
ChrisztM. (2002) Temps have a permanent place in the workforce, EconSouth, 4(3), pp. 14–19.
11.
CohanyS. (1998) Workers in alternative employment arrangements: a second look, Monthly Labor Review, 121(11), pp. 3–21.
12.
DennisW. J. (1996) Self-employment: when nothing else is available?, Journal of Labor Research, 17(4), pp. 645–661.
13.
DoussardM.PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2009) After deindustrialization: uneven growth and economic inequality in ‘postindustrial’ Chicago, Economic Geography, 85(2), pp. 183–207.
14.
FelsteadA.JewsonN. (2000) In Work, At Home: Towards an Understanding of Homeworking. London: Taylor and Francis.
15.
FerberM.WaldfogelJ. (1998) Long-term consequences of nontraditional employment, Monthly Labor Review, 121(5), pp. 3–12.
16.
FreedmanA. (1985) Rising Use of Part-time and Temporary Workers: Who Benefits and Who Loses?Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
17.
GiulianoG. (1998) Information technology, work patterns and intra-metropolitan location: a case study, Urban Studies, 35(7), pp. 1077–1095.
18.
GiulianoG. (2003) Travel, location and race/ethnicity, Transportation Research Part A, 37, pp. 351–372.
19.
GleasonS. E. (2006) Introduction, in: GleasonS. E. (Ed.) The Shadow Workforce: Perspectives on Contingent Work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, pp. 1–26. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute.
20.
GoldenL. (2008) Limited access: disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), pp. 86–109.
21.
HansonS.PrattG. (1995) Gender, Work, and Space. London: Routledge.
22.
von HippelC.BendapudiV.TanskyJ. W.. (2006) Operationalizing the shadow workforce: toward an understanding of the participants in nonstandard employment relationships, in: GleasonS. E. (Ed.) The Shadow Workforce: Perspectives on Contingent Work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, pp. 29–62. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute Press.
23.
HippleS. (1998) Contigent work: results from the second survey, Monthly Labor Review, 121(11), pp. 22–35.
24.
HippleS. (2001) Contingent work in the late-1990s, Monthly Labor Review, 124(3), pp. 3–27.
25.
HirschB. T.MacphersonD. A.VromanW. G. (2001) Estimates of union density by state, Monthly Labor Review, 124(7), pp. 51–55.
26.
HotchkissJ. (2004) Labor market lessons from Georgia’s temp workers, EconSouth, 6(2), pp. 12–17.
27.
KallebergA. L. (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: part-time, temporary and contract work, Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), pp. 341–365.
28.
KallebergA. L.ReskinB. F.HudsonK. (2000) Bad jobs in America: standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States, American Sociological Review, 65(2), pp. 256–278.
29.
KirschenmanJ.NeckermanK. M. (1991) ‘We’d love to hire them, but’: the meaning of race for employers, in: JencksC.PetersonP. E. (Eds) The Urban Underclass, pp. 203–232. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
30.
LiuC. Y. (2011) Employment concentration and job quality for low-skilled latino immigrants, Journal of Urban Affairs, (DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00543.x10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00543.x).
31.
MarlerJ.MoenP. (2005) Alternative employment arrangements: a gender perspective, Sex Roles, 52(5), pp. 337–349.
32.
MehtaC.TheodoreN. (2003) Organizing temps: representational rights and employers’ responsibilities under sturgis and jeffboat, WorkingUSA, 7(3), pp. 21–43.
33.
MehtaC.TheodoreN. (2006) Workplace safety in Atlanta’s construction industry: institutional failure in temporary staffing arrangements, WorkingUSA, 9(1), pp. 59–77.
34.
MoosM.SkaburskisA. (2007) The characteristics and location of home workers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, Urban Studies, 44(9), pp. 1781–1808.
35.
MuhlC. J. (2002) What is an employee? The answer depends on the federal law, Monthly Labor Review, 124(1), pp. 3–11.
36.
OhJ. H. (2008) The quest to understand self-employment in American metropolitan areas, Urban Studies, 45(9), pp. 1769–1790.
37.
PeckJ. (2008) Remaking laissez-faire, Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), pp. 3–43.
38.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2001) Contingent Chicago: restructuring the spaces of temporary labor, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(3), pp. 471–496.
39.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2007) Flexible recession: the temporary staffing industry and mediated work in the United States, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2), pp. 171–192.
40.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. I. K.WardK. (2005) Constructing markets for temporary labour: employment liberalization and the internationalization of the staffing industry, Global Networks, 5(1), pp. 3–26.
41.
PolivkaA. E. (1996) Contingent and alternative work arrangements, defined, Monthly Labor Review, 119(3), pp. 3–9.
42.
PolivkaA. E.NardoneT. (1989) On the definition of ‘contingent work’, Monthly Labor Review, 112(12), pp. 9–16.
43.
PolivkaA. E.CohanyS.HippleS. (2000) Definition, composition, and economic consequences of the nonstandard workforce, in: CarréF.FerberM. A.GoldenL.HerzenbergS. A. (Eds) Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenges of Changing Employment Arrangements, pp. 41–94. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
44.
PresserH. B. (2003) Race-ethnic and gender differences in nonstandard work shifts, Work and Occupations, 30(4), pp. 412–439.
45.
RedmanT.SnapeE.AshurstC. (2009) Location, location, location: does place of work really matter?, British Journal of Management, 20(s1), pp. S171–S181.
46.
RugglesS.AlexanderJ. T.GenadekK.. (2010) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0. Machine-readable database, University of Minnesota (http://usa.ipums.org/usa/; accessed 2011).
47.
ShenQ. (2000) Spatial and social dimensions of commuting, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), pp. 68–82.
48.
Spalter-RothR.HartmannH. (1998) Gauging the consequences for gender relations, pay equity, and the public purse, in: BarkerK.ChristensenK. (Eds) Contingent Work: American Employment Relations in Transition, pp. 69–100. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
49.
TillyC. (1996) Half a Job: Bad and Good Part-time Jobs in a Changing Labor Market. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
50.
US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2011) Regional economic information system (http://www.bea.gov/).
WaldingerR.LimN.CortD. (2007) Bad jobs, good jobs, no jobs? The employment experience of the Mexican American second generation, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), pp. 1–35.
53.
WengerJ. B. (2006) Public policy and contingent workers, in: GleasonS. E. (Ed.) The Shadow Workforce: Perspectives on Contingent Work in the United States, Japan, and Europe, pp. 169–200. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute Press.
54.
ZhangM. (2006) Travel choice with no alternative: can land use reduce automobile dependence?, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(3), pp. 311–326.
