Two significant trends have occurred in urban areas across the US during recent decades: immigration and the decentralisation of employment. While each trend has been investigated by research, the magnitude of spatial disparity between immigrant settlement patterns and employment location and its change over time has received much less attention. Using a sample of the 60 largest immigrant metropolitan areas, this study uses a spatial mismatch index and regression methods to address this question over the period 1980–2000. Results indicate that immigrants are more spatially mismatched with job opportunities than the White population, but less so than the Black population. It is found that job growth occurred close to where the native-born Whites concentrate and away from immigrants and other minority populations. However, immigrants’ residential location patterns shifted towards employment opportunities and was able to offset the otherwise enlarging spatial disparity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR. D.LoganJ. R.StultsB. J.. (1999) Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation, American Sociological Review, 64(3), pp. 446–460.
2.
AnasA.ArnottR.SmallK. A. (1998) Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), pp. 1426–1464.
3.
AponteR. (1996) Urban employment and the mismatch dilemma: accounting for the immigration exception, Social Problems, 43(3), pp. 268–283.
4.
BairdJ.AdelmanR. M.ReidL. W.JaretC. (2008) Immigrant settlement patterns: the role of metropolitan characteristics, Sociological Inquiry, 78(3), pp. 310–334.
5.
BrennanJ.HillE. W. (1999) Where are the jobs? Cities, suburbs, and the competition for employment. Survey Series, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
6.
CamarotaS. A.JenseniusK. (2009) Trends in immigrant and native employment. Center for Immigration Studies, Washington, DC, May.
7.
CutlerD. M.GlaeserE. L.VigdorJ. L. (2008) Is the melting pot still hot? Explaining the resurgence of immigrant segregation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), pp. 478–497.
8.
DawkinsC. J. (2009) Exploring recent trends in immigrant suburbanization, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(3), pp. 81–98.
9.
ElliottJ. R.SimsM. (2001) Ghettos and barrios: the impact of neighborhood poverty and race on job matching among blacks and latinos, Social Problems, 48(3), pp. 341–361.
10.
EllisM.WrightR.ParksV. (2007) Geography and the immigrant division of labor, Economic Geography, 83(3), pp. 255–281.
11.
FreyW. H. (2001) Melting pot suburbs: a census 2000 study of suburban diversity. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
12.
FreyW. H.LiawK.-L. (2005) Migration within the United States: role of race and ethnicity, in: BurtlessG.PackJ. R. (Eds) Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 2005, pp. 207–262. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
13.
FreyW. H.BerubeA.SingerA.WilsonJ. H. (2009) Getting current: recent demographic trends in metropolitan America. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
14.
FreyW. H.WilsonJ. H.BerubeA.SingerA. (2004) Tracking metropolitan America into the 21st century: a field guide to the new metropolitan and micropolitan definitions. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
15.
GlaeserE. L.KahnM. E.ChuC. (2001) Job sprawl: employment location in the U.S. metropolitan areas. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
16.
HardwickS. W. (2008) Toward a suburban immigrant nation, in: SingerA.HardwickS. W.BrettellC. B. (Eds) Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America, pp. 31–50. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
HempsteadK. (2007) Mobility of the foreign-born population in the United States, 1995–2000: the role of gateway states, International Migration Review, 22(4), pp. 333–349.
18.
HolzerH. J.StollM. A. (2007) Where workers go, do jobs follow? Metropolitan labor markets in the U.S., 1990–2000. Metro Economy Series, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
19.
IhlanfeldtK. R.SjoquistD. L. (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform, Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), pp. 849–892.
20.
JaretC.GhadgeR.ReidL. W.AdelmanR. M. (2009) The measurement of suburban sprawl: an evaluation, City and Community, 8(1), pp. 65–84.
21.
KainJ. F. (1968) Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(2), pp. 175–197.
22.
KneeboneE. (2009) Job sprawl revisited: the changing geography of metropolitan employment. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
23.
LiW. (1998) Anatomy of a new ethnic settlement: the Chinese ethnoburb in Los Angeles, Urban Studies, 35(3), pp. 479–501.
24.
LichterD. T.ParisiD.TaquinoM. C.GriceS. M. (2010) Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared, Social Science Research, 39, pp. 215–230.
25.
LiuC. Y. (2009) Ethnic enclave residence, employment and commuting of Latino workers, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), pp. 600–625.
26.
LoganJ. R.AlbaR. D.ZhangW. Q. (2002) Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles, American Sociological Review, 67(2), pp. 299–322.
27.
LoganJ. R.StultsB. J.FarleyR. (2004) Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: two decades of change, Demography, 41(1), pp. 1–22.
28.
MartinR. W. (2001) The adjustment of black residents to metropolitan employment shifts: how persistent is spatial mismatch?, Journal of Urban Economics, 50(1), pp. 52–76.
29.
MartinR. W. (2004) Can black workers escape spatial mismatch? Employment shifts, population shifts, and black unemployment in American cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 55(1), pp. 179–194.
30.
MasseyD. S. (1985) Ethnic residential segregation: a theoretical synthesis and empirical review, Sociology and Social Research, 69, pp. 315–350.
31.
MasseyD. S. (2008) New Faces in New Places: The Changing Geography of American Immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation, Social Forces, 67, pp. 281–315.
33.
MieszkowskiP.MillsE. S. (1993) The causes of metropolitan suburbanization, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), pp. 135–147.
34.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (1999) Bulletin 99-04. OMB, June.
PainterG.YuZ. (2010) Immigrants and housing markets in mid-size metropolitan areas, International Migration Review, 44(2), pp. 442–476.
38.
PainterG.LiuC. Y.ZhuangD. (2007) Immigrants and the spatial mismatch hypothesis: employment outcomes among immigrant youth in Los Angeles, Urban Studies, 44(13), pp. 2627–2649.
39.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W.McKenzieR. (Eds) (1925) The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
ParksV. (2004) Access to work: the effects of spatial and social accessibility on unemployment for native-born black and immigrant women in Los Angeles, Economic Geography, 80(2), pp. 141–172.
41.
PastorM.MarcelliE. (2000) Social, spatial and skill mismatch among immigrants and native-born workers in Los Angeles. Working Paper No. 1, Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.
42.
PrestonV.McLaffertyS.LiuX. F. (1998) Geographical barriers to employment for American-born and immigrant workers, Urban Studies, 35(3), pp. 529–545.
43.
RaphaelS. (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis and black youth joblessness: evidence from the San Francisco Bay area, Journal of Urban Economics, 43(1), pp. 79–111.
44.
RaphaelS.StollM. A. (2002) Modest progress: the narrowing spatial mismatch between blacks and jobs in the 1990s. Living Cities Census Series, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
45.
RaphaelS.StollM. A. (2010) Job sprawl and the suburbanization of poverty. Metropolitan Opportunity Series No. 5, Brookings Institution, Washinton, DC.
46.
SingerA. (2004) The rise of new immigrant gateways. Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
47.
SingerA.HardwickS. W.BrettellC. B. (Eds) (2008) Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48.
StollM. A. (1999) Spatial mismatch, discrimination, and male youth employment in the Washington, DC area: implications for residential mobility policies, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(1), pp. 77–98.
49.
TimberlakeJ. M.HowellA. J.StraightA. J. (2011) Trends in the suburbanization of racial/ethnic groups in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970 to 2000, Urban Affairs Review, 47(2), pp. 218–255.
TurnerM. A.RossS. L.GalsterG. C.YingerJ. (2002) Discrimination in metropolitan housing markets: national results from Phase 1 HDS 2000. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC (http://www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/phase1_report.pdf).
52.
WangQ. (2006) Linking home to work: ethnic labor market concentration in the San Francisco CMSA, Urban Geography, 27(1), pp. 72–92.
