The construction of new housing has been the most visible of all the spatial changes to have affected the post-socialist suburban landscape. It is argued in this article that former summer-home settlements are a hidden component of contemporary residential suburbanisation in former socialist countries. The building of summer or weekend homes (dacha settlements in the former Soviet Union) around major cities for urban residents was a specific feature of socialist metropolitan planning. After removing construction restrictions, the stock of vacant dachas started to support the supply side of the suburban housing market. While dachas were a reserve of affordable housing during the recession of the 1990s, they served as a stock of building plots during the construction boom of the mid 2000s. In the Tallinn Metropolitan Area, former second homes are even more important than new post-1991 residential areas in terms of giving access to detached houses to the metropolitan population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AringJ.HerfertG. (2001) Neue Muster der Wohnsuburbanisierung, in: BrakeK.DangschatJ. S.HerfertG. (Eds) Suburbanisierung in Deutschland: aktuelle Tendenzen, pp. 43–56. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
2.
van den BergL.DrewettR.KlaassenL.. (1982) A Study of Urban Growth and Decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
3.
BorenT.GentileM. (2007) Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: an introduction, Geografiska Annaler, 89B(2), pp. 95–110.
4.
BourneL. S. (1997) Reinventing the suburbs: old myths and new realities, Progress in Planning, 46(3), pp. 163–184.
5.
BradeI.NefedovaT. (1998) Entwicklungstendenzen und Perspektiven der Stadt- Umland-Prozesse in Ruβland, Europa Regional, 6(4), pp. 23–34.
6.
BradeI.SmigielC.KovacsZ. (2009) Comparing residential suburban development in post-socialist urban regions: the case of Moscow, Sofia and Budapest, in: KilperH. (Ed.) German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2009, pp. 79–104. Berlin: Springer.
7.
BrenP. (2002) Weekend getaways: the chata, the tramp, and the politics of private life in post-1968 Czechoslovakia, in: CrowleyD.ReidS. (Eds) Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc, pp. 123–140. New York: Berg Publishers.
8.
BreuerT. (2005) Retirement migration or rather second-home tourism? German senior citizens on the Canary Islands, Die Erde, 136(3), pp. 313–333.
9.
ChampionT. (2001) Urbanization, suburbanization, counterurbanization and reurbanization, in: PaddisonR. (Ed.) Handbook of Urban Studies, pp. 134–161. London: Sage Publications.
10.
CloutH.BlacksellM.KingR.PinderD. (1989) Western Europe: Geographical Perspectives. London: Longman.
11.
CoppockJ. T. (1977) Second homes in perspective, in: CoppockJ. T. (Ed.) Second Homes: Curse or Blessing?, pp. 1–15. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
12.
CrouchC. (1999) Social Change in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
EnyediG. (1996) Urbanization under socialism, in: AndruszG.HarloeM.SzelènyiI. (Eds) Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies, pp. 100–118. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
14.
FialováD. (1999) Second homes in the hinterland of Prague and possibilities of their transformation for permanent houses, Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae: Geographica, Supplementum2(II), pp. 213–221.
15.
FilippowichL. (1994) Gorozhane za gorodom [Cities outside the cities], Vash Vybor, 3.
16.
FriedrichsJ. (1995) Stadtsoziologie. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
17.
GallentN.MaceA.Tewdwr-JonesM. (2003) Dispelling a myth? Second homes in rural Wales, Area, 35(3), pp. 271–284.
18.
GentileM.SjöbergÖ. (2006) Intra-urban landscapes of priority: the Soviet legacy, Europe–Asia Studies, 58(5), pp. 701–729.
19.
GentileM.TammaruT. (2006) Ethnicity and housing in Ust’-Kamenogorsk, Kazahkstan, Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1757–1778.
20.
GeyerH.KontulyT. (1993) A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization, International Regional Science Review, 15(3), pp. 157–177.
21.
HallC. M.MüllerD. K. (2004) Introduction: second homes, curse or blessing? Revisited, in: HallC. M.MüllerD. K. (Eds) Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes: Between Elite Landscapes and Common Ground, pp. 3–14. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
22.
HartshornT.MullerP. (1989) Suburban downtowns and the transformation of metropolitan Atlanta’s business landscape, Urban Geography, 10(4), pp. 375–395.
23.
HausladenG. (1983) Regulating urban growth in the USSR: the role of satellite cities in Soviet urban development. PhD thesis, Syracuse University.
24.
HeitkampT. (2002) Motivlagen der Stadt- Umland-Wanderung und Tendenzen der zukünftigen Wohnungsnachfrage, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, pp. 163–171.
25.
HendersonS. R. (1999) Self-help housing in the Weimar Republic: the work of Erst May, Housing Studies, 14(3), pp. 311–328.
26.
HerfertG. (2007) Regionale Polarisierung der demographischen Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland: Gleichwertigkeit der Lebensverhältnisse?, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 65(5), pp. 435–455.
27.
HirtS. (2007) Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change, Urban Geography, 28(8), pp. 755–780.
28.
IoffeG.NefedovaT. (1998) Environs of Russian cities: a case study of Moscow, Europe–Asia Studies, 50(8), pp. 1325–1356.
29.
IoffeG.NefedovaT. (2001) Land use changes in the environs of Moscow, Area, 33(3), pp. 273–286.
30.
KährikA. (2000) Housing privatisation in the transformation of the housing system: the case of Tartu, Estonia, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 54(1), pp. 2–11.
31.
KährikA.TammaruT. (2008) Population composition in new suburban settlements of the Tallinn metropolitan area, Urban Studies, 45(5), pp. 1055–1078.
32.
van KempenR.DekkerK.HallS.TosicsI. (Eds) (2005) Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.
33.
KnoxP.PinchS. (2000) Urban Social Geography. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
34.
KokH.KovácsZ. (1999) The process of suburbanisation in the metropolitan area of Budapest, Netherlands Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 14(2), pp. 119–141.
35.
KornaiJ. (1992) The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
KostinskiyG. (2001) Post-socialist cities in flux, in: PaddisonR. (Ed.) Handbook of Urban Studies, pp. 451–465. London: Sage Publications.
37.
LadányiJ.SzelényiI. (1998) Class, ethnicity and urban restructuring in postcommunist Hungary, in: EnyediG. (Ed.) Social Change and Urban Restructuring in Central Europe, pp. 67–86. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
38.
LeetmaaK. (2002) Suvilapiirkonnad Harjumaal [Summer home areas in Harju county]. Study report, Harju County Government.
39.
LeetmaaK.AnnisteK. (2009) Tallinna linnaregiooni nõukogudeaegsed suvilaalad sotsialismijärgses eeslinnastumises [Soviet summer home settlements in post-socialist suburbanization in the Tallinn urban region], in: ManderÜ.UuemaaE.PaeT. (Eds) Uurimusi eestikeelse geograafia 90. aastapäeval. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
40.
LeetmaaK.TammaruT. (2007) Suburbanisation in countries in transition: destinations of suburbanizers in the Tallinn metropolitan area, Geografiska Annaler, 89B(2), pp. 127–146.
41.
LeetmaaK.TammaruT.AnnisteK. (2009) From priority-led to market-led suburbanisation in a post-communist metropolis, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(4), pp. 436–453.
42.
ListengurtF.PortjanskiiJ.JusinG. (1987) Programno-tselovoe planirovanije sistem naselennyh mest. Moskva: Ekonomika.
43.
LõhmusL. (2006) Nõmme ajalugu [The history of Nõmme]. Tallinn: Koolibri.
44.
LovellS. (2002) Soviet exurbia: dachas in post-war cities, in: CrowleyD.ReidS. (Eds) Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc, pp. 105–121. Oxford: Berg.
45.
LovellS. (2003) Summerfolk: A History of the Dacha, 1710–2000. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46.
LundgrenJ. O. J. (1974) On access to recreational lands in dynamic metropolitan hinterlands, Tourist Review, 29(4), pp. 124–131.
47.
MachrovaA. (2007) Changing housing markets in Russian cities, Geographische Rundschau International, 3(1), pp. 28–35.
48.
MarjavaaraR. (2007) The displacement myth: second home tourism in the Stockholm Archipelago, Toursim Geographies, 9(3), pp. 296–317.
49.
MarjavaaraR.MüllerD. K. (2007) The development of second homes’ assessed property values in Sweden 1991–2001, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), pp. 202–222.
50.
MarksooA. (1995) Estonian urban system in transition, in: PalomäkiM.KarunaratneJ. (Eds) Urban Development and Urban Life, pp. 179–192. Vaasa: University of Vaasa Press.
51.
MarksooA. (1999) Restructuring of urban and rural settlement in Estonia, in: CarterF.MaikW. (Eds) Shock–Shift in an Enlarged Europe: The Geography of Socio-economic Change in East-central Europe after 1989, pp. 81–102. Aldershot: Ashgate.
52.
MortonH. (1980) Who gets what, when, and how? Housing in the Soviet Union, Soviet Studies, (32)2, pp. 235–259.
53.
MüllerD. K. (2007) Second homes in the Nordic countries: between common heritage and exclusive commodity, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), pp. 193–201.
54.
NuisslH.RinkD.CouchC.KarechaJ. (2007) Decline and sprawl: urban sprawl is not confined to expanding city regions, in: CouchC.LeontidouL.Petschel-HeldG. (Eds) Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, Land-use Change and Policy, pp. 136–162. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
55.
NyströmJ. (1989) From the city to the city’s countryside, Geografiska Annaler, 71B(3), pp. 183–200.
56.
PalacinJ.ShelburneR. (2005) The private housing market in eastern Europe and the CIS. Discussion Paper Series No. 6, Economic Analysis Division, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva.
57.
Pichler-MilanovičN.Gutry-KoryckaM.RinkD. (2007) Sprawl in the post-socialist city: the changing economic and institutional context of central and eastern European cities, in: CouchC.LeontidouL.Petschel-HeldG. (Eds) Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, Land-use Change and Policy, pp. 102–135. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
58.
PócsiG. (2009) Socialist past and diverse futures: differentiation of ‘small hobby gardens’ in Szeged, Hungary. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Post-communist Urban Geographies: Actors Shaping Urban Change, Tartu, Estonia, September.
59.
PtačekP. (2002) Development of second housing in the Olomouc region, Geographica: Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, 37, pp. 69–75.
60.
RenaudB. (1992) The housing systems of the former Soviet Union: why do the Soviets need housing markets?, Housing Policy Debate, 3(3), pp. 877–899.
61.
RudolphR.BradeI. (2005) Moscow: processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery, Cities, 22(2), pp. 135–150.
62.
StolbergE.-M. (2006) Kakanien—Arcadien: Gartenästhetik in Osteuropa als Zivilisationsentwurf im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Bonn: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität.
63.
SýkoraL.ČermákD. (1998) City growth and migration patterns in the context of ‘communist’ and ‘transitory’ periods in Prague’s urban development, Espace Population Sociétés, 3, pp. 405–416.
64.
TammaruT. (2005) Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area, Environment and Planning A, 37(9), pp. 1669–1687.
65.
TammaruT.KuluH.KaskI. (2004) Urbanization, suburbanization, and counterurbanization in Estonia, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(3), pp. 212–229.
66.
TammaruT.LeetmaaK.SilmS.AhasR. (2009) Temporal and spatial dynamics of the new residential areas around Tallinn, European Planning Studies, 17(3), pp. 423–439.
67.
TrulyD. (2002) International retirement migration and tourism along the Lake Chapala Riviera: developing a matrix of retirement migration behaviour, Tourism Geographies, 4, pp. 261–281.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
