Pilar is a city located in the third ring of the Buenos Aires metropolitan region (Argentina). Over the past 30 years, the widespread development of gated residential communities has seemingly gone hand-in-hand with an urbanisation of this outer suburb signalled by the arrival of new populations, enterprise, retail and other services. The growth of the ‘private city’ of these gated communities therefore has important implications for the ‘public city’ of the wider suburban municipality. Drawing upon original research based on the opinions of key informants, this paper considers how the growth of the ‘private city’ has contributed to the economy of, processes of community-building and social cohesion in Pilar. In conclusion, it is suggested that gated residential communities have been a major factor in the emergence of the dual suburb that is Pilar today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarskyA.VioM. (2007) La problemática del ordenamiento territorial en cinturones verdes periurbanos sometidos a procesos de valorización inmobiliaria: el caso del Partido del Pilar, Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Paper presented at the IX Coloquio Internacional de Geocrítica: ‘Los problemas del mundo actual. Soluciones y alternativas desde la geografía y las ciencias sociales’, Porto Alegre, Universidad Federal do Rio Grande do Soul, May/June.
2.
BlakelyE. J.SnyderM. G. (1997) Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
3.
BorsdorfA.HidalgoR. (2008) Der Urban Sprawl in Europa und Lateinamerika: Ein Vergleich der Entwicklungen europäischer und lateinamerikanischer Agglomerationen, Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 150, pp. 229–250.
4.
BorsdorfA.HidalgoR.SánchezR. (2007) A new model of urban development in Latin America: the gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaiso, Cities, 24, pp. 365–378.
5.
CaldeiraT. (2000) City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
CiccolellaP.VecslirL. (2010) Nuevos espacios del terciario y transformación metropolitana en Buenos Aires. Paper presented at the XI Seminario Internacional Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre Globalización y Territorio, Mendoza, Argentina, October.
7.
CIPPEC (Centro de Implementación de Políticas Públicas para la Equidad y el Crecimiento) (2005) Diagnóstico para la Planificación. Caso Municipio de Pilar, October.
8.
DearM.FlustyS. (1998) Postmodern urbanism, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, pp. 50–72.
9.
DickH.RimmerP. (1998) Beyond the Third World city: the new urban geography of south-east Asia, Urban Studies, 35, pp. 2303–2321.
10.
FishmanR. (1987) Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
11.
FrugG. (1999) City Making: Building Communities without Walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
GarreauJ. (1991) Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.
13.
Le GoixR. (2005) Gated communities: sprawl and social segregation in southern California, Housing Studies, 20, pp. 323–343.
14.
GoytiaC. (2005) Private residential investment growth: implications on municipal revenues and socio-economic indicators. the case of the municipality of Pilar. Paper presented at the Urban Research Symposium 2005, World Bank-IPEA, April.
15.
INDEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos) (n.d.) INDEC website. Argentina (http://www.indec.gov.ar).
16.
KirbyA. (2008) The production of private space and its implications for urban social relations, Political Geography, 27, pp. 74–95.
17.
Libertun de DurenN. R. (2007) Gated communities as a municipal development strategy, Housing Policy Debate, 18, pp. 607–626.
18.
MasseyD. (1994) A global sense of place, in: MasseyD. (Ed.) Space Place and Gender, pp. 146–156. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
McKenzieE. (1994) Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
MolotchH. (1976) The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 309–332.
21.
PhelpsN. A.WoodA. M. (2011) The new post-suburban politics?, Urban Studies (forthcoming).
22.
PhelpsN. A.ParsonsN.BallasD.DowlingA. (2006) Post-suburban Europe: Planning and Politics at the Margins of Europe’s Capital Cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
23.
PírezP. (2002) Buenos Aires: fragmentation and the privatization of the metropolitan city, Environment & Urbanization, 14, pp. 145–158.
24.
PublicountryS.R.L. (2005) Guía de Countries, Barrios Privados y Chacras. Publicountry S.R.L., Capital Federal, Argentina.
25.
RoitmanS. (2008) Urban social group segregation: a gated community in Mendoza, Argentina. Unpublished PhD thesis, Development Planning Unit, University College London.
26.
RoitmanS. (2010) Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences, Urban Design and Planning, 163(1), pp. 31–38.
27.
RoitmanS.GiglioM. A. (2010) Latin American gated communities: the latest symbol of historic social segregation, in: BagaeenS.UdukuO. (Eds) Gated Communities: Social Sustainability in Contemporary and Historical Gated Developments, pp. 63–78. London: Earthscan.
28.
RoitmanS.WebsterC.LandmanK. (2010) Methodological frameworks and interdisciplinary research on gated communities, International Planning Studies, 15(1), pp. 3–23.
29.
SabatiniF.CáceresG. (2004) Los barrios cerrados y la ruptura del patrón tradicional de segregación en las ciudades latinoamericanas: el caso de Santiago de Chile, in: CáceresG.SabatiniF. (Eds) Barrios Cerrados en Santiago de Chile: entre la exclusión y la integración residencial, pp. 9–43. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Instituto de Geografía and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Santiago de Chile.
30.
SabatiniF.SalcedoR. (2005) Gated communities and the poor in Santiago, Chile: functional and symbolic integration in a context of aggressive capitalist colonization of lower class areas. Paper presented at the conference Territory, Control and Enclosure: The Ecology of Urban Fragmentation, Pretoria, February/March.
31.
SmithK. E. (2006) Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews, Geoforum, 37, pp. 643–653.
32.
SvampaM. (2001) Los que ganaron: la vida en los countries y barrios privados. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
33.
TeafordJ. (1997) Post-suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
ThuillierG. (2005) Gated communities in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina: a challenge for town planning, Urban Studies, 20, pp. 255–271.
35.
VerdecchiaC. R. (1995) Los clubes de campo, Revista Arquis, 5, pp. 26–28.
36.
Vidal-KoppmannS. (2007) Transformaciones socio-territoriales de la Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires en la última década del Siglo XX: la incidencia de las urbanizaciones privadas en la fragmentación de la periferia. Unpublished PhD thesis, FLACSO Argentina.
37.
WebsterB. (2002) Property rights and the public realm: gates, greenbelts, and gemeinschaft, Environment & Planning B, 29, pp. 397–412.
