This paper proposes that urban economic analysis would benefit from the use of cognitively perceived neighbourhoods, which are discussed within urban studies. Georeferenced data should be aggregated by spatially bounded units that are identifiable by citizens in order to enrich one-dimensional distance as the sole variable to bring urban complexity into economic models. Multivariate analysis is applied to data from Belo Horizonte, Brazil, to formulate four indices, ranked by neighbourhoods that together represent a spatially complex, non-linear influence on urban real estate markets. The results of the indices by neighbourhood are then tested against a traditional specification in an econometrics exercise that does not include the concepts and indices put forward. The definition of neighbourhood used and the empirical results provide a thorough description of urban fabric that can fully and more accurately represent urban influence in economics while avoiding abstract distance measurement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamJ. M.GoetzmannW. N.WachterS. M. (1994) Homogeneous groupings of metropolitan housing markets, Journal of Housing Economics, 3, pp. 186–206.
2.
AlonsoW. (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AnselinL. (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4.
ArbiaG. (2006) Spatial Econometrics: Statistical Foundations and Applications to Regional Convergence. Berlin: Springer.
5.
ArcherW. R.GatzlaffD. H.LingD. C. (1996) Measuring the importance of location in house price appreciation, Journal of Urban Economics, 40, pp. 334–353.
6.
BidermanC. (2001) Forças de atração e expulsão na grande São Paulo. Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo.
7.
BourassaS. C.CantoniE.HoesliM. (2007) Spatial dependence, housing submarkets and house price prediction, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35, pp. 143–160.
8.
BourassaS. C.HamelinkF.HoesliM.MacGregorB. D. (1999) Defining housing submarkets, Journal of Housing Economics, 8, pp. 160–183.
9.
CanA.MegbolugbeI. (1997) Spatial dependence and house price index construction, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14, pp. 203–222.
10.
de CastroÍ. E.CorreaR. L.da CostaP. C. G. (2001) Geografia: Conceitos E Temas. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
11.
CheshireP.SheppardS. (1995) On the price of land and the value of amenities, Economica, 62, pp. 247–267.
12.
CoultonC. J.KorbinJ.ChanT.SuM. (2001) Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note, American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, pp. 371–383.
13.
CullenG. (1961) Townscape. London: The Architectural Press.
14.
Dale-JohnsonD. (1982) An alternative approach to housing market segmentation using hedonic price data, Journal of Urban Economics, 11, pp. 311–332.
15.
DantasR. A.MagalhãesA. M.VergolinoJ. R. D. O. (2007) Avaliação de imóveis: a importância dos vizinhos no caso de recife, Economia Aplicada, 2(2), pp. 231–251.
16.
DurlaufS. N. (2004) Neighbourhood effects, in: HendersonJ. V.ThisseJ.-F. (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 2173–2242. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17.
FáveroL. P. L. (2005) O mercado imobiliário residencial de São Paulo: uma aplicação de modelos de comercialização hedônica e correlação canônica. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
18.
FáveroL. P. L.BelfioreP. P.LimaG. A. S. F. D. (2008) Modelos de precificação hedônica de imóveis residenciais na região metropolitana de São Paulo: uma abordagem sob as perspectivas da demanda e da oferta, Estudos Econômicos, 38(1), pp. 73–96.
19.
FurtadoB. A. (2009) Modelling social heterogeneity, neighbourhoods and local influences on urban real estate prices: spatial dynamic analyses in the Belo Horizonte Metropolitan Area, Brazil. Dissertation, Faculteit Geowetenschappen, Universiteit Utrecht.
20.
GalsterG. (1996) William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 1797–1805.
21.
GalsterG. (2001) On the nature of neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 2111–2124.
22.
GolabC. (1982) The geography of the neighbourhood, in: BayorR. (Ed.) Neighbourhoods in Urban America, pp. 70–85. Washington, DC: Kennikat Press.
23.
GonzálezM.FormosoC. (1994) Especificação de modelos de preços hedônicos para locação residencial em porto alegre, Cadernos Ippur/UFRJ, 8(1).
24.
GoodmanA. C.ThibodeauT. G. (1998) Housing market segmentation, Journal of Housing Economics, 7, pp. 121–143.
25.
GrigsbyW.BaratzG.GalsterG.. (1987) The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Change and Decline. London: Pergamon.
26.
GuestA. M.LeeB. A. (1983) Consensus on locality names in the metropolis, Sociology and Social Research, 67, pp. 374–391.
27.
GuoJ. Y.BhatC. R. (2007) Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: application to residential location choice analysis, Journal of Transport Geography, 15, pp. 31–45.
28.
HermannB. M.HaddadE. A. (2005) Mercado imobiliário e amenidades urbanas: a view through the window, Estudos Econômicos, 35, pp. 237–269.
LeeB. A.CampbellK. E. (1997) Common ground? Urban neighborhoods as survey respondents see them, Social Science Quarterly, 78, pp. 922–936.
31.
LeeB. A.OropesaR. S.KananJ. W. (1994) Neighborhood context and residential mobility, Demography, 31, pp. 249–270.
32.
LemosC. B.FerreiraG. H. d. M.HardyJ. M. C.PereiraM. A. (2004) A questão intra-urbana, in: LemosM. B.DinizC. C. J.CarvalhoA. M. d.SantosF. (Eds) PBH—Século XXI. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR/UFMG.
33.
LeSageJ. (1999) The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics. University of Toledo.
34.
LynchK.CamargoJ. L. (1960) The Image of the City. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
35.
MacedoP. B. R. (1996) Hedonic price model with spatial effects: an application to the housing market of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in: Textos para discussão. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR/FACE/UFMG.
36.
MegbolugbeI. F.Hoek-SmitM. C.LinnemanP. D. (1996) Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: a review of the contributions of William G. Grigsby, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 1779–1795.
37.
MendonçaJ. G. (2002) Segregação e mobilidade residencial na RMBH. IPPUR/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
38.
MendonçaJ. G.GodinhoM. H. d. L. (2003) População espaço e gestão na metrópole: novas configurações, velhas desigualdades [People, space and management in the metropolis: new configurations, old inequalities]. Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.
39.
MingotiS. A. (2005) Análise De Dados Através De Métodos De Estatística Multivariada [Data analysis using multivariate statistics methods]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
40.
MoraisM. D. P.CruzB. D. O. (2003) Demand for housing and urban services in Brazil: a hedonic approach. Textos para discussão No. 946, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
41.
NaikD. N.KhattreeR. (1996) Revisiting Olympic track records: some practical considerations in the principal component analysis, The American Statistician, 50, pp. 140–144.
42.
PinheiroF. J. (2006) Desenvolvimento humano na região metropolitana de Belo Horizonte: atlas metropolitano [Human development in the greater area of Belo Horizonte: metropolitan atlas]. Centro de Estudos Econômicos e Sociais, FJP Belo, Horizonte.
43.
RosenS. (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 34–55.
44.
RossiA. (1966) L’architettura della Città [Architecture of the city]. Padova/MIT Press.
45.
SchnareA. B.StruykR. J. (1976) Segmentation in urban housing markets, Journal of Urban Economics, 3, pp. 146–166.
46.
SerraM. V.DowallD.MottaD.DonovanM. (2005) Urban land markets and urban land development: an examination of three Brazilian cities Brasília, Curitiba and Recife. Textos para discussão No. 1082, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
47.
SheppardS. (1999) Hedonic analysis of housing markets, in: CheshireP.MillsE. S. (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 1595–1636. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48.
StevensonS. (2004) New empirical evidence in heteroscedasticity in hedonic housing models, Journal of Housing Economics, 13, pp. 136–156.
49.
SuttlesG. D. (1972) Social Construction of Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
TuanY. (1980) Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51.
TuanY. (1983) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. São Paulo: DIFEL.
52.
TverskyB. (2003) Structures of mental spaces: how people think about space, Environment and Behavior, 35, pp. 66–80.
53.
WheatonW. C. (2004) Commuting, congestion, and employment dispersal in cities with mixed land use, Journal of Urban Economics, 55, pp. 417–438.
54.
WheatonW. C.NechayevG. (2005) Does location matter?, Journal of Portfolio Management, 32, pp. 100–108.
