For domiciled individuals, homeless people provide a disturbing reminder that all is not right with the world. Reactions to seeing homeless people frequently encompass repulsion, discomfort, sympathy and sometimes futility. This paper considers domiciled constructions of homeless people drawn from interviews with 16 participants recruited in the central business district of a New Zealand city. It documents how, when trying to make sense of this complex social problem, domiciled people draw on shared characterisations of homeless people. The concept of ‘social distance’ is used to interrogate the shifting and sometimes incongruous reactions evident in participant accounts. ‘Social distancing’ is conceptualised as a dynamic communal practice existing in interactions between human beings and reflected in the ways that domiciled people talk about their experiences with homeless individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BilligM. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BilligM.CondorS.EdwardsD.. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.
3.
BogardusE. S. (1925) Measuring social distances, Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, pp. 216–266.
4.
BuckP.ToroP.RamosM. (2004) Media and professional interest in homelessness over 30 years (1974–2003), Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4, pp. 151–171.
5.
BunisW.YancikA.SnowD. (1996) The cultural patterning of sympathy toward the homeless and other victims of misfortune, Social Problems, 43, pp. 387–402.
6.
de CerteauM. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. RendalS.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
DixonJ.DurrheimK. (2004) Dislocating identity: desegregation and the transformation of place, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, pp. 455–473.
8.
DuneierM.MolotchH. (1999) Talking city trouble: interactional vandalism, social inequality, and the ‘urban interaction problem’, American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp. 1263–1295.
9.
ForteJ. (2002) Not in my social world: a cultural analysis of media representations, contested spaces, and sympathy for the homeless, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29, pp. 131–157.
10.
FreyR.PowellL. (2005) Beyond left–right ideology in the study of justice perception: interdependent and independent distributive worldviews in Jamaica and New Zealand, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 36, pp. 117–146.
11.
HodgettsD.StolteO. (2010) Dropping into or drifting along in a homeless lifeworld (unpublished paper; details available from the authors upon request).
12.
HodgettsD.CullenA.RadleyA. (2005) Television characterizations of homeless people in the United Kingdom, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, pp. 29–48.
13.
HodgettsD.DrewN.SonnC.. (2010) Social Psychology and Everyday Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
14.
HodgettsD.StolteO.ChamberlainK.. (2008) A trip to the library: homelessness and social inclusion, Social and Cultural Geography, 9, pp. 933–953.
15.
HodgettsD.StolteO.RadleyA.. (2010) The mobile hermit and the city: places, objects and sounds for a social psychology of homelessness, British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, pp. 285–303.
16.
JovchelovitchS. (2007) Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.
17.
KingfisherC. (2007) Discursive constructions of homelessness in a small city in the Canadian prairies, American Ethnologist, 34, pp. 91–107.
18.
LaurensonP.CollinsD. (2007) Beyond punitive regulation? New Zealand local governments’ response to homelessness, Antipode, 39, pp. 649–667.
19.
LeeB.FarrellC.LinkB. (2004) Revisiting the contact hypothesis: the case of public exposure to homelessness, American Sociological Review, 69, pp. 40–63.
20.
LeeB.LinkB.ToroP. (1991) Images of the homeless: public views and media messages, Housing Policy Debate, 2, pp. 649–682.
21.
LeesL. (2004) The Emancipatory City? Paradoxes and Possibilities. London: Sage.
22.
LefebvreH. (2000) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
LevineD.CarterE.GormanE. (1976) Simmel’s influence on American sociology I, American Journal of Sociology, 81, pp. 813–845.
24.
LewinK. (1936) Social-psychological differences between the United States and Germany, Character and Personality, 4, pp. 265–293.
25.
LinkB.SchwartzS.MooreR.. (1995) Public knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about homeless people: evidence for compassion fatigue?, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, pp. 533–555.
26.
MitchellD. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. London: Guilford Press.
27.
MitchellD.HeymenN. (2009) The geography of survival and the right to the city: speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention, Urban Geographies, 30, pp. 611–632.
28.
PahlR.SpencerL. (2004) Capturing personal communities, in: PhillipsonC.AllanG.MorganD. (Eds) Social Networks and Social Exclusion, pp. 72–96. Aldershot: Ashgate.
29.
ParkR. (1924) The concept of social distance, Journal of Applied Sociology, 8, pp. 339–344.
30.
RadleyA.KennedyM. (1995) Charitable giving by individuals: a study of attitudes and practice, Human Relations, 48, pp. 685–709.
31.
RadleyA.HodgettsD.CullenA. (2005) Visualising homelessness: a study of photography and estrangement, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, pp. 273–295.
SchiffL. (2003) The power to define: definitions as a site of struggle in the field of homelessness, Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, pp. 491–507.
34.
SibleyD. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.
35.
SibleyD. (2001) The binary city, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 239–250.
36.
SimmelG. (1908/1921) The social significance of ‘the stranger’, in: ParkR.BurgessE. (Eds) Introduction to the Science of Sociology, pp. 322–327. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
SimmelG. (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. WolffK.. New York: Free Press.
38.
StoneB. L. (2008) The most unique of all species, Society, 45(2), pp. 146–151.
39.
TompsettC.ToroP.GuzickiM.. (2006) Homeless in the United States: assessing changes in prevalence and public opinion, 1993–2001, American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, pp. 47–61.
40.
TriandisH.TriandisL. (1962) A cross-cultural study of social distance, Psychological Monographs, 76(21), pp. 1–21.
41.
VerkuytenM. (2005) Immigration discourses and their impact on multiculturalism: a discursive and experimental study, British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, pp. 223–240.
42.
WarkC.GalliherJ. (2007) Emory Bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale, American Sociologist, 38, pp. 383–395.
43.
WiddowfieldR. (2001) Beggars, blaggers and bums? Media representations of homeless people, The National Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences Review, January/July, pp. 51–53.
44.
WilliamsJ. (2003) ‘A Roof over My Head’: Homeless Women and the Shelter Industry. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
45.
WilliamsR. (1947) The reduction of intergroup tensions: a survey of research on problems of ethnic, racial, and religious group relations. Social Science Research Council, New York.
46.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.LeachC. (2008) Exploring the psychological mechanisms of collective action: does relevance of group influence how people cope with collective disadvantage?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, pp. 353–375.
